A Need For Speed?

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

"Imagine boarding a train in the center of a … whisking through towns at speeds over 100 … and ending up just blocks from your destination." That's the vision President Obama laid out in April while unveiling his plan to spend $13 billion on high-speed rail (HSR) by 2014. But will it ever become a reality? Next month, D.C. will split the first funds among 11 designated corridors. A road map for the journey ahead:

A BETTER-CONNECTED AMERICA
Advocates see HSR as a green way to link the megaregions of the future (shaded). Start with the highest-impact projects, they say, then grow the network.

HOW THE U.S. MEASURES UP
With only one slower, shorter line in service (the Acela), we're far behind the leading HSR nations.

Sources: America 2050; U.S. Government Accountability Office; Amtrak

© 2009

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Al Gore's Climate-Change Evolution
Al Gore's Climate-Change Evolution

Using emotion to convince people to change.

Heaven Can Wait
Heaven Can Wait

A new book promises proof of eternal life.

The World's Biggest Foods
The World's Biggest Foods

Monster edibles from around America.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Georg @ 07/26/2009 7:08:31 PM

    Even if your article showed China with the fastest train, it should be mentioned that this train is based on German technologie which was copied by the Chinese after Germany sold one train to connect Beijing and Peking.
    But as you mentioned in "Germany's Green Technophobia" it was never given a chance in Germany because of the environmentalists. A possible track in northern Germany was canceled because of environmental reasons. Another one in southern Germany fell victim to political turf wars and therefore exploding costs.

    A German who left Germany ten years ago working in New Mexico in the flight simulation industrie

  • Posted By: SpyGlass @ 07/25/2009 6:36:57 PM

    Spot on. Amtrak has yet to function smoothly throughout the country, especially in regional areas. In New England, the Amtrack trains stop at the Massachusetts border, severing Vermont, New Hampshire and Maine from the rest of the country.

    In the South West, there is NO direct route-train or bus- connecting Los Angeles, CA to Phoenix, AZ. An Amtrak ride from Phoenix to LA is 12 hours long, when in a car only ~6 hours.

    A train ride from Los Angeles to Santa Barbara (2 hours drive) for some reason is $60-Not much of an incentive to use the trains. Same with Los Angeles to San Diego, $60 for a 2 hour ride (Boston to Providence, RI- a 1 hour commuter ride- is only $10)

    Though I will give Amtrak credit; The Massachusetts commuter rail is highly effective for the suburbs immediately surrounding Boston. And they do have a cross country route from Boston to Los Angeles that is only 36hrs long, and only requires 2 train changes in Albany and Chicago. It makes you wonder, though, why one needs to make 6 train/bus switches to get from Phoenix to LA, but only 2 changes from coast to coast.

  • Posted By: ctamirisa @ 07/22/2009 10:33:27 AM

    This Newsweek hardcopy magazine report article chart showing the anticipated costs of high-speed rail especially in the face of the demand for it from the various states as reported by the analyses of America 2050 and Transportation for America (t4America.org) is miniscule as compared to the cost of the financial markets bailouts so far. The irony of these bailouts is that had that money been invested by the financial markets on projects such as these we would be on our way to robust growth by now.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now