SPONSORED BY:

Meddle Nettle

When countries interfere in foreign rebellions.

From left: Thomas Coex / Getty Images; Dennis Cook / AP; Hussein Malla / AP; Ruslan Musayev / AP
The patrons: Venezuela's Hugo Chávez denies that his government supports FARC rebels in Colombia; President Ronald Reagan says he never deliberately lied to the public about the Iran-contra affair, in which the United States funded Nicaraguan rebels through secret arms sales to Iran. The beneficiaries: Hizbullah's Hassan Nasrallah gets cash from Iran; Chechen warlord Shamil Basayev was thought to have Saudi backing.
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

A sovereign state is, by definition, supposed to manage affairs inside its borders. But that's not always the case, especially when it comes to disputes involving guerrilla movements. After all, moral equivalency or not, one nation's terrorists really are another's freedom fighters, and foreign governments sometimes cross international borders to protect antigovernment forces elsewhere, reinforce ethnic movements, or simply to make their presence known. Last week, for example, documents revealed that Venezuela is still supporting the FARC guerrillas in Colombia.

Not surprisingly, this uninvited meddling is not received warmly; intrusions often cause major international crises. By offering military aid, financial support, and political alliances to rebel groups, nations can sour relations with their neighbors (as with Venezuela and Colombia) or even with distant foes (as with Saudi Arabia and Russia). Here is a brief overview of nations that have wreaked havoc by meddling in the business of other countries.

Years: 1964-present
The meddler: Venezuela
The transgression: Caracas provides money and political support for Colombia's FARC guerrillas.
Considered a terrorist organization by a number of countries, including the United States, FARC guerrillas have been fighting to overthrow the government in Colombia since the 1960s. They operate inside the jungles along Venezuela's border and represent the largest Marxist insurgency in Latin America. The group is infamous for its kidnappings of foreign citizens and violent attacks against Colombian targets. Since coming into power in 2002, President Alvaro Uribe, whose own father was killed in a FARC kidnapping attempt, has successfully battled the insurgents; but he still hasn't found a way to cut off the aid that FARC militants receive from abroad.

Venezuela is considered to be sympathetic to the FARC. In an effort to legitimize the group's plight, President Hugo Chávez has urged Colombia to recognize it as a "belligerent force" instead of "terrorists." Chávez's ties to FARC are so close that, in August 2007, Uribe asked the Venezuelan president to serve as a mediator in talks over freeing hostages held by the group. When the negotiations fell apart, the two leaders traded public insults (Chávez compared Uribe to a "mafia boss"; Uribe reiterated by calling him a "legitimizer of terrorists"). Chávez has repeatedly denied his government's collaboration with the rebel group.

But in March 2008, when Colombia raided a FARC camp in Ecuador, its analysts discovered intelligence that suggested Venezuela had given $300 million and military support to the FARC. Venezuela responded by sending troops to its Colombian border. Last week new evidence obtained from rebels showed that Venezuelan officials still assist the FARC by securing arms deals and facilitating the rebels' movement inside Venezuela.

Years: 1985-1986
The meddler: The U.S.
The transgression: Washington funded contra rebel group in Nicaragua with arms sales to Iran.
During the Cold War, the United States did its fair share of intervening, under the Reagan Doctrine, to prevent the spread of Soviet-backed communism. One particular case erupted into a scandal involving two otherwise little-related nations, Nicaragua and Iran. The anticommunist opposition in Nicaragua, the contras, was formed in 1979 to fight the socialist regime. They often used violent means, such as rape, torture, and murder, during their struggle. But because they were fighting the Cuban-backed Sandinista government, they were the "moral equal of our Founding Fathers," according to President Reagan, and thus the recipient of large financial and military support from the United States. The U.S. was also influential in strengthening the contras by unifying and training the largely disorganized groups that made up the opposition.

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Visions of a Decade
Visions of a Decade

From 2000-2009, one photo per month.

The Failure of Copenhagen
The Failure of Copenhagen

Why there could be a silver lining in a failed climate treaty.

Sex Scandals of the 2000s
Sex Scandals of the 2000s

From John Edwards to Mark Sanford, the decade's memorable affairs.

118 Days in Hell
118 Days in Hell

A NEWSWEEK journalist recounts his captivity in Iran.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: shalbaf @ 08/22/2009 4:28:45 AM

    Dear hellboy07???. As what we know, Taliban and saddam hussein s party were being supported by United state in the specific time.
    Exactly when USA feared from influential role of soviet union in region, it supported Taliban.
    On the other hand when united state had concerned about revolution 1979 in Iran, it supported saddam hussein and provided arms for his party and prepared conditions for 8 year war between two countries.
    If united state wants any regime, group or person for its imperial goals, it supports them, but if they are not useful, it tries to pretend them as terrorist.

  • Posted By: shalbaf @ 08/22/2009 4:28:08 AM

    Dear hellboy07???. As what we know, Taliban and saddam hussein s party were being supported by United state in the specific time.
    Exactly when USA feared from influential role of soviet union in region, it supported Taliban.
    On the other hand when united state had concerned about revolution 1979 in Iran, it supported saddam hussein and provided arms for his party and prepared conditions for 8 year war between two countries.
    If united state wants any regime, group or person for its imperial goals, it supports them, but if they are not useful, it tries to pretend them as terrorist.

  • Posted By: fluffy II @ 08/16/2009 8:31:43 AM

    It's about time the international community step in to insist that India and Pakistan resolve the issue of Kashmir. Its status is under dispute and has been documented by various United Nations resolutions as a de jure international dispute. This festering lack of resolution has become a danger to international security and the people of Kashmir deserve a redress of their greivances. Several Indian figures have even called for immediate negotiations between India and Pakistan, the latest being Omar Abdullah, an elected politician of Indian-controlled Kashmir.

    The time has come for India to give-up in intransigience and allow the international community to assist both Pakistan and India, on behalf of the Kashmiri people, whether Muslim, Hindu, Sikh or Buddhist, to come to some agreement on Kashmir's status.

    The continuation of the status quo not only endangers the innocent population of Kashmir, India and Pakistan, but now has put in jeopardy the security of the entire world.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now