SPONSORED BY:

‘Inglourious Basterds’: When Jews Attack

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

In Inglourious Basterds, Tarantino indulges this taste for vengeful violence by—well, by turning Jews into Nazis. In history, Jews were repeatedly herded into buildings and burned alive (a barbarism on which the plot of another recent film, The Reader, hangs); in Inglourious Basterds, it's the Jews who orchestrate this horror. In history, the Nazis and their local collaborators made sport of human suffering; here, it's the Jews who take whacks at Nazi skulls with baseball bats, complete with mock sports-announcer commentary, turning murder into a parodic "game." And in history, Nazis carved Stars of David into the chests of rabbis before killing them; here, the "basterds" carve swastikas into the foreheads of those victims whom they leave alive.

Tarantino, the master of the obsessively paced revenge flick, invites his audiences to applaud this odd inversion—to take, as his films often invite them to take, a deep, emotional satisfaction in turning the tables on the bad guys. ("The Germans will be sickened by us," Raine tells his corps of Jewish savages early on.) But these bad guys were real, this history was real, and the feelings we have about them and what they did are real and have real-world consequences and implications. Do you really want audiences cheering for a revenge that turns Jews into carboncopies of Nazis, that makes Jews into "sickening" perpetrators? I'm not so sure. An alternative, and morally superior, form of "revenge" for Jews would be to do precisely what Jews have been doing since World War II ended: that is, to preserve and perpetuate the memory of the destruction that was visited upon them, precisely in order to help prevent the recurrence of such mass horrors in the future. Never again, the refrain goes. The emotions that Tarantino's new film evokes are precisely what lurk beneath the possibility that "again" will happen.

Tarantino's movie may be the latest, if the most extreme, example of a trend that shows just how fragile memory can be—a series of popular World War II films that disproportionately emphasize armed Jewish heroism (Defiance) and German resistance (Valkyrie, White Rose), or elicit sympathy for German moral confusion (The Reader). If so, it may be that our present-day taste for "empowerment," our anxious horror of being represented as "victims"—nowadays there are no victims, only "survivors"—has begun to distort the representation of the past, one in which passive victims, alas, vastly outnumbered those who were able to fight back. "Facts can be so misleading," Hans Landa, the evil SS man, murmurs at one point in Inglourious Basterds. Perhaps, but fantasies are even more misleading. To indulge them at the expense of the truth of history would be the most inglorious bastardization of all.

Mendelsohn is the author of The Lost: A Search For Six of Six Million.

© 2009

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Gone Rogue
Gone Rogue

How Sarah Palin hurts the GOP … and America.

The Decade's Best Quotes
The Decade's Best Quotes

NEWSWEEK's 20/10 Project recalls the lines we'll never forget.

Best Celebrity Mugshots
Best Celebrity Mugshots

10 unforgettable arrest photos from the 2000s.

An Evolutionary Edge
An Evolutionary Edge

How grandmas may play favorites.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Psienesis @ 09/16/2009 3:00:44 PM

    Hmm, I dunno, I don't feel the least bit threatened by Woody Allen, though I've always enjoyed his films (well, most of them). We may need qualifiers for "jewophobia".

  • Posted By: Psienesis @ 09/16/2009 2:56:05 PM

    HInt: Most of the remaining Holocaust survivors are nearing the end of their natural lives. Anyone under the age of 65 (give or take) claiming that watching Holocaust films for them is "healing" is lying to you, because they weren't there.

    The Holocaust was a terrible thing. Most of the Jews living today, however, didn't live through it. While it's certainly a noble effort for all of humanity to recognize the horrors of genocide, we all need to collectively get over an instance of it happening to one people, in particular, and strive to ensure that it never happens to any people.

    That said, it's still fun to watch "bad guys" get blown up at movies. Come on, folks, it's a *movie*! It's not real!

  • Posted By: Psienesis @ 09/16/2009 2:49:06 PM

    Because Tarantino does not film historical dramas or films "based on a true story"; you'll not find "Braveheart: A Quentin Tarantino Film". It's simply not the sort of film that he makes.

    Your question is like asking why George Lucas filmed "Star Wars" instead of a historic documentary about the early American space program.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now