Ahmadinejad’s Nuclear Offer

The Iranian president discusses his proposal to buy enriched uranium from the United States, his continued denial of the Holocaust, and Tehran's detention of journalist Maziar Bahari.

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: mkf1 @ 10/21/2009 1:09:07 PM

    Rob007. I am here to counter your lies about Nazi Germany. You say the Nazi Party posted anti Nazi propoganda. which demonstrates how ridiculous your posts are. Luther made no anti Semitic rants, he wrote about his dislike for Judaism, small wonder considering the conduct of Jews over the millenia. Jews being asked to wear a star of David is no different to Jews wearing them today on necklaces. Because most Jews were Bolsheviks and attempting the overthrow of the German state they were interned where they lived, much the same as the Japanese internment camps. Many Germans were worked to death, shot, or gassed, The cities of Dresden, Hiroshima, and Nagasaki were all set on fire, and millions were killed by burning. The claims of 6 million Jews, do not supersede the deaths of 60 million non-Jews. The deaths of Jews and non-Jews is a result of war, not of genocide. I am not hee to change your mind. You have swallowed the Zionist bait, hook, line, sinker, fisherman, boat and ocean. The Jewish Hasbara operatives, spin doctors, like yourself attempt to dominate the historical record with your false assertions.

    • Posted By: Rob007 @ 10/21/2009 1:51:14 PM

      mkf1-

      You got me.  I wrote nazi instead of Jewish.  Am I tapped out now....no takebacks?  Can I make no errors in syntax?

      There are volumes of books by Luther which clearly demonstrate his antisemitism in his later years:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Luther_and_antisemitism

      "Conversion of the Jews will be the work of God alone operating from within, and not of man working — or rather playing — from without. If these offences be taken away, worse will follow. For they are thus given over by the wrath of God to reprobation, that they may become incorrigible, as Ecclesiastes says, for every one who is incorrigible is rendered worse rather than better by correction. [2]"

      Your statement about Jews going to overthrow Germany - sounds as if you lifted that from Hitler himself.  Is that your reference?

      You comments show more about you than about any kind of actual history.  Do you forget that there are still people alive who lived through the holocaust?  I know them and knew those who past on...both military and concentration camp survivors.  There is too much evidence that Jews were sytematically ghettoized, rounded up, and gassed...specifically for being jews.  There is too much evidence...this is too easy and argument.  But to continue is like wasting time to prove that 1+1=2.  i won't be convinced otherwise, especially not on the internet.  I have seen enough real, physical and live evidence to refute everything about your post.

       

      So just remember, my son.  We're watching you.

  • Posted By: zebra01 @ 10/17/2009 9:19:14 PM

    How was this interview arranged?

  • Posted By: mkf1 @ 10/04/2009 4:53:50 AM

    Nazism, National Socialsm, has nothing to do with Jews. It is a political system. Many countries have their own national version of socialism, this has nothing to do with Jews. Jews are not a race, they are a religion. To call Jews a race, is racist. Jews have targeted Babylonians, Egypians, Romans, Christians, Germans and Arabs for their hatred. If you total the people killed by Jews from the time they began warring it is probably the highest body count. Currently Jews and their homeland, created by a crime against humanity, have been identified as war criminals by the United Nations.

    • Posted By: Rob007 @ 10/05/2009 1:25:03 PM

      MK-

      1. Nazi Germany (circa 1930-1945) had everything to do with Jews.  a. the Nazi Party posted anti Nazi propaganda from its inception to when it was in full power, placing Luthers antisimetic rants in glass enclosed cases.  b. Every Jew in Nazi occupied Europe was to be identified and was forced to wear the star of David on their shirt. c. Jews identified by such a star were moved to ghettos, which were walled in. d. Eventually, they were ALL targetted to be transported to concentration camps where they were worked to death, shot, or gassed - all 6 million of them within the span of about 6 years.  How has that nothing to do with Jews?  I spoke to living grandparents who liberated these camps, had teachers in high schoool who had survived them.  Do you deny this type of systematic genocide occurred?

      2. No fascist party calls itself "fascist".  However the Nazi Party might have called themselves, they were far from socialized.  If they were, how comne the current neo-Nazis, who follow Hitler's proinciples to the core, do not associate themselves in any way with socialists?  Most dictatorships either call themselves socialist or a type of "people's Party" (similar to authoritarian communist regimes).

      3. I am not here to change your mind.  It is set.  I am here to counter every post you make, to counter you, to ensure you do not have any influence.  I am here because of you and I am here to stay....and watch.

  • Posted By: Unoman @ 10/02/2009 6:59:05 AM

    Prof. Dr Slobodan Lang -
    I would like to know your opinion on Ahmadinejad's view, and of some groups in Europe and USA, that the Holocaust is a myth designed to give it so much attention over other groups that also suffered so much death under the Third Reich. These groups question the number of deaths, 6 million Jews, implying there was an exageration to make it be seen that the Jews suffered more than any other group during WWII. I still fail to understand, why not produce the records of counts to prove that 6 million Jews were killed ? and why should people and groups that question the numbers be attacked, with such contempt and ridicule ? wouldn't it have been so direct to prove the doubting Thomases ? why is it so difficult to address their questions ?
    I found this comment from mkf1 to be food for thought and would also like to know your views, as he points out and I quote "All there is, is the death of many millions of people in WW2. Regardless of their religion or ethnicity or mode of death. I personally refuse to take part in the "Holocaust mania" For this reason I say yes, Jews, Christians, Muslims, Sikhs, Atheists, all died in WW2 and no group deserves more sympathy than any other. For this reason I reject the self aggrandizing label of "Holocaust" Questioning the actual numbers of each group who were killed in a concentration camp is not anti-semitism, nor is it being "a Holocaust denier" The very idea of criminalizing free speech, as they have done in some European states, makes their claims of freedom, completely ludicrous. It is hypocritical to claim to posess freedom of speech and then turn around a criminalize speech."....unquote...... and now this brings me to ask
    Prof. you can undoubtely see that mkf1 used inverted comas whenever there is a word Holocaust apparently indicating his views which I leave it to you for interpretation, my basic question is, did these other groups suffered the same level of persecution and death as the Jews ? and if so was it in gross numbers as the Jews ? and again if so, why aren't the records much known ? and finally, how did the term Holocaust, which prior to WWII was used to denote the violent deaths of large number of people(Winston Churchill describing the Armenian Genocide of WWI), change to be solely used to denote the genocide of European Jews ?

    • Posted By: Prof. Dr Slobodan Lang @ 10/02/2009 4:14:43 PM

      Nazism claimed that homosexuals, retarded, mentally sick, Gypsies, Jews and other are not equal to others and should be killed. They did kill them, without relationship to war, wherever they could .
      Other victims in WWII, including millions of civilians from many nations, were killed as a result of fighting, destruction and killing in the war
      Today, we cannot do anything about changing history, but we can believe and practice equality of people and peace making.
      Genocide of any people is recognized as a major global crime. Aggression should be also.

    • Posted By: Rob007 @ 10/02/2009 12:56:55 PM

      Unoman,

       Sorry to interject your conversation with the prof - but I have to say that undoubtedly the Jews absolutely DID suffer extremely more than any other race under the Nazis (defined by number of killed, and German prosecution of ethnic cleansing policies which specifically targetted Jews over other races).  This is not fabricated, it is knowable and there is a plethora of varying sources all collaborating the same information.  Apart from that, people live to tell the story...people's grandparents, who marched into places like Aushwitz to liberate the them.  As we can see, already too much time has passed, and now everything again is "nebulous"; everyting we said we'd never as a people forget, we are forgetting and going back to basic questions for which already too much information collaborates. It is not a surprise.  Only 30 years later, did the Khmer Rouge do the same thing to their people, later the Bosnian Serbs to theirs (Muslims in that case), and the Rwandans to theirs.  So we forget.  But at least we edcutated and relatives of the living should not accept that such damning and unquestionable evidence turn into "nebulous" during our lifetime.

      And now we see post like those from mkf1, wich would have been discarded in past as flatearthers just a decade ago, cause the less knowing to questions to known and the knowable, digging for some conspiracy that might mean the perspective is wrong.  It is not.

  • Posted By: Unoman @ 10/01/2009 9:43:32 PM

    Rob007 -
    It was a good post but I guess a further scrutiny would be needed beyond mainstream writings and from other forms of historical background. It's a common knowledge that most of the past centuries historians on nations and races were purposely ommiting crucial facts out of their writings either for their own purposes or to align to their ruler's perspectives.

    In this case, in my view, there must have been a hidden hand pushing for the Jews to leave Europe for the unknown of the new country in the Middle-East. We probably have to look deeper as to simply put it down on shear resourcefullness and ingenuity leaves a lot of questions unanswered. How can one explain the rationale behind it when these people had a well established life in Europe? They had homes, jobs, friends etc... surely noone would, on his own accord, would want to do that unless life was to them so insecure and intolerable. Afterall, they were nationals of those European countries.
    On the antisemitism I think to say it due to the Jews un-integration in European or Chistian culture will be tantamount to underplaying the real cause. Antisemitism stemmed and grew out of the Europeans' fear, and as we all are aware of, fear can turn to jealousy which if left unchecked can in time turn into hatred. The Jews were having much more success than Europeans especially in crucial segments of the economy like in industry, banking, trade and entreprenualship in general, and were excelling in professions like medical doctors, engineers, and the top academia etc... which really wasn't a threat to the other citizens but to a few businessmen and political figures who couldn't match them. In fact, if we trully take a decent look at it, these same reasons continue to be the source of antisemitism todate.
    I know that the Jews lived for hundreds of years in the whole of the Arab World countries and some continue to this day, and many had been accepted as part of the society, now can the creation of the state of Israel be a source of antisemitism in the Arab World ? and if no is the answer, what is/are the reason/s ? and if yes is the answer, how can it be tackled ?

    • Posted By: Rob007 @ 10/02/2009 12:43:45 PM

      Unoman -

      In your post, I see 2 subjects: 1. What are causes of antisemtism relating to early 20th century Germany?  2. Why did the Jews leave Europe to settle another region in such high numbers?  On the side, you also wonder why Arabs engage in such antisemitism and why Europe had this culture of anti-semitism.  Let me share my opinion:

      1. As for causes of antisemitism in the era of the 3rd Reich:  You stated some businessmen would have been prejudice because of jewish success.  That may be one of the acute reasons, but the chronic reasons speak mainly to Germany's economic position following their humiliating defeat from WWI.  As the Jews of Europe stood apart from their Christian counterparts not only in culture, but by dress and so on, they were an easily identifiable race apart.  I believe as a race, they were proportionately more financially seen as successful over their German counterparts in an era of deep depression and desparation.  Add to that the historic anti-semitism of German culture (which distinctly began under Martin Luther as I wrote before), and an ultra nationalist rising party (all ultranationalists castigate "foreign" looking people and the Jews' probably easily fit that target) who readily absorped this antisemetic history, and you have the catalyst to turn prejudice into discrimination and eventually to violence and mass extermination.

      2. As for the Jews leaving Europe (of course they did not all leave Europe):  Before asking this quesiton, you MUST read and understand HOW they did this.  That information is not fabricated because it was told by the one Jewish combat battalion that helped initiate Israel migration as well as the fact that this information correlates with various other sources, like the UK and US.  Secondly, you must understand that from a Jewish perspective, you would not want to raise a family in that region for quite some time, had you experienced the hate, fear, sorrow and death and such an unbelievable scale.  Many migrated to other places like America.  But there is an interesting history as to the 1945 Israeli struggle for independence, and like anything else, it had largely to do with the British Empire (which covered 25% of the globe at one time).  Wikipedia has this concise history: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel.  Israeli Prime Minister Ben Gurion pushed hard to create incentives to populate Israel with as many displaced European Jews as possible.  Just look at the current Laws of Israel and how they related to Jews, vs. non-Jews.

      You suggest that perhaps the Jews were pushed to move out of Europe.  Perhaps there is something to that.  But why would this have happened?  Why would it have been covered up?  And what about the currently known history appears incomplete that this new information explains? 

      As for Arab anti-semitism, I can only posit that this is much different that European anti-semitism in its history ans seems much more of a "sect" hatred the Arabs hold for their neighbors; a nemesis based on religious differences alone.  Apart from that, you can only imagine what impact the Independence of Israel in the middle of Arab states had on the muslim region.  I assume that in itself would have created severe animosity.  If there is more to that history, I am not aware of it.

  • Posted By: Prof. Dr Slobodan Lang @ 10/02/2009 4:30:12 AM

    Ahmadinejad posed important questions about Holocaust which can and should be answered with respect and tolerance opening global dialogue of responsibility.
    1. Holocaust is universal crime because it didn't recognize equality of all people, regardless of race, faith, health condition, gender and political opinion. As a result it claimed that some people should not live and performed mass killing.
    2. It is of global relevance even though it did happen in Europe, as any other major human experience, discovery, art ...
    3. It has influence today precisely because it was not unique. Some who beleived it was unique, used ???Never again??? approach. But genocides, mass crimes, aggression and totalitarian thinking are present today and they are a major challenge to all of us
    4. Palestinian people are linked to Holocaust as any of us. We are all responsible to prevent it in the future
    5. Holocaust suffering of hate, violation of human rights, displacement, camps, killing is a major challenge of goodness to develop knowledge and means of preventing it.

  • Posted By: Unoman @ 09/29/2009 9:39:38 PM

    It's true millions of people perished too from other groups but at least the survivors could still go back to their family properties and start a new life and build on, wherein one had a sense of belonging there. As for the Jews I don't think it was the same case. I mean how could one have a sense of belonging to a community that had cheered when the entire Jewish communities were being sent to concentration camps ? It's obvious to the Jews who couldn't make it to the new countries it was better to relocate and go live far away in your new country where everyone would be as you, having suffered the same fate, it brings a sense of togetherness albeit in need. I sometimes think, again it may be incorrect, that Europeans were in fact wanting the Jews to leave their countries, to go live in a country of their own instead of accepting them as a part of the citizenry, which was by itself clear antisemitism on the part of European Governments. Otherwise how do you explain it when people, who have lived for 2,3, or 4 generations, are asked to move to a new country far away in the Middle East, totally different to European climate and lifestyle ? which brings me to another question, what is the source of antisemitism ? is the term antisemitism applying for the Jews only ? We all know there is racial hatred in many countries is mostly targeted on minorities, borne out of jealousy on economic prosperity, profession success, fear of competition, greed etc... I guess these are same causes for hatred of the Jews in European countries and in North and South America......can it be correct to say there is antisemitism in the Arab World too ?

    • Posted By: Rob007 @ 09/30/2009 11:45:11 AM

      Unoman -

      To be clear, the Jews of Europe were not told to go and migrate to Israel, they actively created it for themselves just at the end of the war.  Read the history of Israel following WWI - it is an almost unbelievable story of resourcefulness (British resources, by the way) and ingenuity.  As for anti-semitism roots: I guess you could go back as far as the 16th Century Martin Luther, whose severe anti-semtism (in his latter years) became imbedded in German culture for years.  Apart from Luther, I believe such European anti-semitism flourished largely because of how culturally un-integrated the Jews were, in a mostly Catholic continent.  Even in the 1930s, they stood out very obviously as a separate culture (dress, practices, etc..), an easy target for an impoverished country looking for someone to pin the blame on.  In the Arab world, they are a Theocracy in the middle of Muslim countries...another dangerous scenario for them.

  • Posted By: Unoman @ 09/29/2009 9:39:20 PM

    I honestly find Rob007 and Repubnomas posts to be well informing, star3 too on my early question, while paulejb drops in with a bit of tread-on-light approach, nothing bad, though. I concur with you the Jews were targeted for annihilation as a group by the Nazis more than any other group even if others too suffered immensely under the Third Reich. I can also understand what mkf1 and Vigilance are trying to point out, other groups suffered the same fate too but not sure it was at the same level as the Jews and if so then the other groups probably didn't take it much and felt no need to set the records straight. I guess mkf1 and Vigilance do feel the Jews are using their WWII suffering to their advantage, something I find nothing wrong about it, as they lived hell in Europe during the war. The Jews were persecuted than any other race in this world. All over Europe for centuries they lived under persecution, from England to Russia, Iberian peninsular to Italy. I think the only reason they had to persevere is that at the time there were no other places to go to. The new countries were very far and difficult to be reached to. There isn't much good reference on antisemitism in Europe after WWI but I am guess the hatred and persecution of the Jews was going on up to the late 1930's prior to WWII and it may have only changed after the war. It was probably, in my view, contributed to them having migrated to America and established themselves thereby wielding some kind of power to be able to directly or indirectly generate enough strong political support to fight the antisemitism movements in Europe and Russia. I hold this view, which may be incorrect though, looking on events after WWII when most of the European countries were encouraging the Jews to go and settle in Israel at a time when nearly every Jewish family had lost everything during the war with nothing to start a new life.

  • Posted By: mkf1 @ 09/29/2009 6:44:32 PM

    Mel Gibson should make a movie called "The passion of Iran" After all, the same tactics that were used against Mel Gibson, are being used against Iran, by the same people. Mel Gibson is well equipped to give the topic an excellent presentation.

    • Posted By: Rob007 @ 09/29/2009 6:57:31 PM

      Great point and awesome comparison.  Mel is about as nutso as Ahmadinejad and probably even more of a fundamentalist.  Go get 'em Mel!  (might even find more Brits to bash in a movie about Iran - somehow?)

  • Posted By: star3 @ 09/28/2009 7:44:51 PM

    The United States would have to be completely insane to do any type business with Iran. Medicinal?! Not likely! Denying the Holocaust is like our being in a DUH state of mind to believe their claims of wanting to restart relatiionships with us----yeah, I'll just bet they do, but for their own good, not for ours! As for Afghanistan being doomed to fail, doesn't he know it is, already a success?! Keep up, man!

    • Posted By: Rob007 @ 09/29/2009 12:52:09 PM

      Star -

      However, a strategic thinking America (while working hard on sanctions and all other preventative actions to stop Iran from obtaining nuclear capability) will have to consider how it will deal with a potentially nuclear Iran.  It is in our best interests to have a plan for this which includes some type of negotiations.  Iran would at that point have the ability to sell nukes to anyone.  We would want to control that.

  • Posted By: Political Pluralism @ 09/27/2009 6:29:09 PM

    As I anticipated Iran has began to trample over Obama. In the early hours of Sunday around 3:30 est., Iran reportedly successfully fired two short range missiles. This is just days after the nuclear site that is currently in construction was discovered outside of Qom(pictured right). I had mentioned a few days ago, that if President Obama would not be aggressive with Iran that they would pursue whatever they want. In hindsight this isn't President Obama's sole problem, other leaders from around the world need to act as well. Congress is now calling for more economic sanction be placed upon Iran, but if you believe sanctions are going to hinder their operation, you might want to rethink that. Diplomacy seems to be out of the picture, regardless if Iran say's they are up for it. Iran's actions are being heard much louder around the world, than the mumbling of Ahmadinejad. If that wasn't enough to get your blood boiling, Iran also mentioned it planned to fire a long range missile capable of hitting Israel, and United States Bases in the gulf region on Monday. If that statement alone doesn't require immediate actions, apparently nothing will. Iran agreed previously that it would have nuclear talks with the United States, Britain, Russia, China, and France in Geneva with the United Nations Security Council Oct. 1. Well with all that said, I don't honestly see a peaceful resolution taking place anytime soon. Iran has a lot to lose, I don't see what they expect to gain from displaying these actions.
    (politicalpluralism.com)

    • Posted By: star3 @ 09/28/2009 10:31:07 PM

      Political P., Obama is an appeaser, however, he is trying to appease everyonbe, except the people he was elected to appease. If our government decides to sell uranium to Iran after that kind of statement, that it plans tp launch a misssile capable of hitting Israel and the U.S, then we are not worthy of being the leader of the free world. Many of us, those who are Christians, see these events taking place in our world today as the end days spoken of in the Bible, when the anti Christ will do everything in his power to win as many away from God as he can, but when the dust settles after the final battle between Jesus and Satan, Jesus will be the victor, and those who have accepted Him will be taken to be with Him in a safe place. We believe these to be the end times as spoken of by the prophets. Many feel they began in 1947, but only God knows when they will end. I pray for our world and for everyone to come to understand and accept truth before it is too late. Time is running out.

      • Posted By: Rob007 @ 09/29/2009 12:48:38 PM

        Star,

        I'm afraid your words about "end days" were repeated too frequently by those who were the loyalist supporters of our last president, who many believed might have thought the same (after all, he did say God told him to invade Iraq - bad call, God).  For the rest of us, we are more skeptical of end of days talk than any rhetoric about Obama's so called appeasing.  After all, simply believing in end days, then having the power (presidentl, for example) can precede the prophecy.  Thus is the problem when the church injects itself into international politics.  There is no indication that Obama is appeasing anyone except his Democratic and Republican Congress.

  • Posted By: Unoman @ 09/28/2009 7:55:05 PM

    much appreciation to Rob007, star3 for your enlighting posts, unfortunately 40YearR was missing my point and in so doing there was a glimpse of him being upset with me, sorry 40 it was never my intention to annoy you in any way. There's also mkf1 for his post, albeit on a different perspective, and which I find to be of a food for thought. If my understanding is right, mkf1 argument is that the evil treatment by the Nazis didn't only cause much death and suffering to the Jews but to other "races" as well. Now, before I proceed further, let me put it out very clear that my aim is to try and see that logic prevails with no intention whatsoever to annoy anyone, my goal is to try and see where the different sides of thoughts can converge and in so doing to encourage logical arguments. Going back to mkf1 posting, as he points out and I quote "All there is, is the death of many millions of people in WW2. Regardless of their religion or ethnicity or mode of death. I personally refuse to take part in the "Holocaust mania" For this reason I say yes, Jews, Christians, Muslims, Sikhs, Atheists, all died in WW2 and no group deserves more sympathy than any other. For this reason I reject the self aggrandizing label of "Holocaust" Questioning the actual numbers of each group who were killed in a concentration camp is not anti-semitism, nor is it being "a Holocaust denier" The very idea of criminalizing free speech, as they have done in some European states, makes their claims of freedom, completely ludicrous. It is hypocritical to claim to posess freedom of speech and then turn around a criminalize speech."....unquote...... and now this brings me to ask more questions, did these other peoples of other "races" eneded up in the same concentration camps as the Jews ? was it in gross numbers as the Jews ? and if so, why isn't it that it isn't much known ? and if one can't call the killings of the millions of Jews "the Holocaust" what would be the ideal term for it ?

    • Posted By: Repubnomas @ 09/28/2009 8:51:10 PM

      The Holocaust happened. Like the moon landing, like 9/11, like the assassination of JFK, like the atomic bombs detonating over Hiroshima and Nagasaki, like torture at Abu Ghraib.
      I say "like" because in the time-frame of those still living, there has been nothing to equate to the methodical, ruthless, insane, murder of millions of Jewish people in Europe. Nothing.

      Horrors. That is the history of the world since the meat grinder of WW1 to the present day. Before that? All relegated to "history" since no one is alive to have witnessed the eons gaping into the distant mist. We have tales of Attila, Genghis, we have "Go kill the Amalekites," and we have a few million people dying on American soil as our Confederate brothers attempted a national abortion with a wire hanger. So much more...

      Horrors: those dark thunderclouds lilting over the eastern shore, the darkness at the end of the tunnel, the joyless kulture of Clockwork Orange. It is all ours.

      Yet the Holocaust sticks in our craw. There has never been a day since the crime was instigated that the most beautiful day in the park, the new grass of the playing field, the tulips of resurrection, every imaginable glory, were not permeated with the stench of our fellow human's burning mutilated flesh. It is the antidote to any Ode to Joy because it is real and it is not mere "history."

      We do not want to speak of it. No words are enough or appropriate to the Sin. So we may deny, we may make movies, write books, feature Nazis as sexy devils with a preference for sexy torture, we may put swastikas on our helmets, make ant-Semitic remarks and laugh, but we do not escape. We all are deniers in our own way. We must be to stay "sane." We continue with the program just as it continues everywhere. We compare our worst to Holocausts, our most evil people to Nazis, Hitler, Fascists, and yet these are the true undead.

      That's why, Star3, nobody wants to talk. And those who do tend toward extreme caution or extreme hatred. So what's to talk about?

      It happened. It didn't stop. The program continues under the guise of "liberation," pacification, democratization... good wars, wars for freedom, for justice, for peace. Wars for peace. Death for life. Fire and rain.

      No, it is not the centralized death machine of our darker dreams, but it lives and walks among us. No, nothing compares because when we come to the end of words, to the end of emotion, to the end of hatred, fear, what then is the meaning of "comparison?"

      It speaks to that dark place in every heart, at the cutting edge of the verisimilar luminous spark of the beyond that also defies description.

      It happened. Is happening...

      • Posted By: Rob007 @ 09/29/2009 12:42:52 PM

        Rububnomas -

        Very literary response.  Appears that what you describe in human ugliness is war.  Those who don't experience it think it sexy.  Some even want it...they think it will satiate fears.  What they don't know is its inherent chaos.  That is why war typically is the last choice of nations...a decision made based on imminent survivability.  War is a bottomless pit of moral, financial, and structural chaos.  Its costs (tangible and intangible) are always much, much more than calculated.  I've seen war firsthand.  It is chaos. 

        Star - my mother was 5, living in London, when the V2s and bombers turned her city into a blaze of fire and she was evacuated to Wales.  The damage of war is irreparable.  It still there in her. 

        We talk about "rushing in" to reform health care.  Why was there no such fears to "rush in" to 2 wars?  Those that have fought or been bombed or mortared (and are still sane) know what war is - and they seldom want it back.

    • Posted By: Rob007 @ 09/29/2009 12:29:35 PM

      Unoman -

      To be clear, in Germany, publically denying that the Holocaust occurred is similarly treated as other forms of speech in America which are not considered a burden to the idea of "free Speech" (inciting violence, inciting public panic, etc..).  It is well known that approximately 6 million jews were among the total of 12 million killed during the war.  This by far makes them the most singled out race to have been systematically slaughtered.  In fact, specifically for the Jews, under the Nazi Party, a culture was created to blame the Jews for all of Germany's economic problems (remember, after their defeat in WWI and their treatment internationally following, Germany was a dismal place to be, economically).  In fact, the rantings of an old Martin Luther (in his later years, he wrote volumes about the fault of the world's problems lying squarely with the Jewish religion) were publically displayed in government buildings.  Thus, the culture of Germany under the Nazi Party became obsessed with the expulsion of all of its jews.  To be fair, many Germans did not know how this expulsion was being executed - but then again, neither did they want to know.  This type of systematic persecution, collection, and slaughter of jews occurred to no other single race or people on such a massive scale.  Jews were required by law to identify themselves with the star of David, they were forced into segregated neighborhoods (called Ghettos) in Germany (and eventually throughout German occupied Europe), then transported to camps where they were worked until no longer able, then killed. 

      Unoman, this is common information, and normally if a peer were to present me with such a question as you present in your post, I would assume such information had been purposely looked over in order to make a political and extreme stand.  But I do not know you nor your background, so I assume you are a younger, or at least less informed (on the subject) person.  There is much information on this subject, and it would be a great aid to your inquisitiveness to dig in, maybe give wikipedia a summary look, then read a bit more to collaborate information - if you are genuinely interested.

      In summary - understand the history of jewish persecution under the Nazis and you will understand why it is important not to allow the proliferation of cults or groups (and there are many) who would deny the holocaust publically, giving credence to enter into extreme neo-nazi affiliations, which in no way benefit any society, but rather bring only violent hate crimes (at a minimum).  As you can see today, a populations can easily be made to forget their past.  See many of my posts, attempting to bring such reminders back).  In the case of WWII, forgetting such a past can have consequences that surpass any hopes for freedoms of speech in future.

    • Posted By: Repubnomas @ 09/28/2009 9:15:53 PM

      While I named Star3 as the recipient of my post, I was speaking to both Star3 and Unoman. Thank you both for your most thoughtful responses and for staying with it until someone answered.
      R

    • Posted By: star3 @ 09/28/2009 8:36:34 PM

      Unoman, first, let me clarify, that by your very exsitence, you will annoy 40, we all annoy him, so welcome to the club; its not you, personally, its everyone here who annoys 40, he is a negative personality, so we just try tio ignor him. Now, to whomever did not think the killing of Jews was any different from anyone else who died in WW2, let me say, that it was different in that the nazis, led by Hitler, deliberately targeted the Jews in particular for annihilation. Yes, other people did die, but they were not a source of a deliberate attempt to destroy as a group. I don't know of any other people besides Jewish who were in the concentration camps, but thats not to say there weren't, however that fact would not change anything as far as their being the primary target of hate by Hitler and his henchmen, so in that respect, yes their deaths were different. It is ironic that when Hitler was a 21 year old homeless waif on the streets, it was the Jewish community who took him in and gave him a job, encouraged him to paint and sold his art work in their shops, then, years later, that was how he repaid them. It was rumored that his mother was a Jew, but never proven to my knowledge. I was barely born when He was in power in Germnany, and I was fortunate enough to be born in America, but I am of German heritiage, as well as English and Irish, and I read a lot of historical novels.

  • Posted By: Repubnomas @ 09/29/2009 2:26:09 AM

    I am not amused. I think I have made it clear that I am not in need of cheerleaders. JB and Lolita, thanks but no thanks.

    It is one thing to disrupt a thread of dueling chimps, but another to interfere in a serious discussion. There are all too few of the latter on the blogs and almost none here.

    I and a couple of others were engaged in about as serious a discussion as ever happens here and you two go off on your Saturday Night Live routine.

    Sometimes you two are as bad as 40 and the bard-boy. The only difference is that you ladies are charming (most of the time) and you can write.

    Which leads me back to my suspicion that you two are Mark Thieme. Apparently, good writing and a little moist irony are so rare here that anybody caught doing it is given the Mark Thieme treatment by 40dude. Maybe he is on to something. Or not.

    Humor aside... both of you, get lost unless you are up for some thoughtful discussion when thoughtful discussion is going on.

    On the other hand, when it is just the chimps in a circle jerk, please seek and destroy with impunity.

    And stop following me around.

  • Posted By: eddymontana @ 09/28/2009 9:59:48 AM

    Can no one speak to the interview, you did read it though, or maybe you just lioke to post your trivial minds.

    • Posted By: star3 @ 09/28/2009 9:08:13 PM

      eddy, thanks for the reminder, yes, we should stiick with the editorial here, and I did touch on it, briefly. I admit I don't have a lot of answers concerning this, more questions than anything, but if it were me in charge if making that decision, I would be very suspicious of their sudden wanting to refresh their relationship with the U.S. Anytime an enemy wants to "re-negotiate", it would be wise to research the reasons behind it. I, quite frankly, don't trust it, but its not my call, so will just have to wait and see if our government agrees with our asessment of the situation or if they will jump at the chance to be "friends" with a questionable country, and, possibly, come to regret it; just hope our government doesn't act in haste. Our politicans were hired to protect the interest of America, not to please the rest of the world, so hope they will remember that.

  • Posted By: Joe Zero @ 09/28/2009 7:00:40 PM

    I am Mark Theme, Mark N. Time, and Zarathustra. I too see may of us, we are everywhere and we do not forget.

  • Posted By: Unoman @ 09/27/2009 6:53:26 PM

    folks, can somone help me here ? I am still at a loss, in light of all the facts and the records on the Holocaust as pointed out by many people, shouldn't it be simple to address anyone quetioning it ? what baffles me is how does it become a crime to question it ? it's on this point that I request to be enlightened, does it really become a crime for one to question what a lot of us believe to be a fact ?

    • Posted By: Rob007 @ 09/28/2009 12:27:22 PM

      Unoman -

      Let me try.  It is a crime in Germany to publically question the holocaust because the evidence (as 40 pointed out) is so overwhelming and still living that such a position taken is considered to be racially motivated.  Such movements aorund the world, specifically denying holocaust (read: neo-nazis), are not without actions and dangers.  I believe in Germany, where history on this subject is most felt, the concern is controlling the potential growth of such a party.  Anti-semitism has centuries of history (since Martin Luther) in Germany and therefore is treated much more delicately than elsewhere.

      • Posted By: star3 @ 09/28/2009 6:22:23 PM

        Unoman, it should not be a "crime" to question it or to deny it---that should be one's personal choice, however, not every country has the same freedoms that we, in America do, so every country may not allow their citizens to deny or question the Holocaust. The Holocaust did, indeed, happen, and anyone who lived through it would be justified in feeling insulted by someoned denying it, but that should not make it a crime to deny it---just stupid, or uninformed or trying to make it go away by their denial, but denying it will not change the fact that it did happend, and is a sad, shameful event in history. Hitler was a madman, and its to the shame of some that they choose to follow him, and they may follow him straight to hell unless they change. Hope that answers, at least, partly, your question. America does not require that it's citizens believe what it dictates, because our government does not dictate, so we are free to believe and think as we choose, as some recent events have shown, which is a beautiful way to govern, and we greatly appreciate that freedom, but, as I mentioned, not every country has that policy.

  • Posted By: Don Keheehaw @ 09/28/2009 5:36:47 AM

    Ahmadishotmywad is a master at twisting the interview to take the focus off his country, and at the same time making the US and Israel look like the perpetrators of evil..

    Islamofascist regime with a leader who dreams of resurrecting the twelfth imam by creating an apocalyptic doomsday - guaranteed he will say all the right things, while trying to gain as much time as possible. Classic stall - be diplomatic and don't raise any flags while buying as much time as possible.

    After Zazi, America needs to wake up! When we least expect it, the next strike looms!

  • Posted By: mkf1 @ 09/28/2009 3:18:45 AM

    All there is, is the death of many millions of people in WW2. Regardless of their religion or ethnicity or mode of death. I personally refuse to take part in the "Holocaust mania" For this reason I say yes, Jews, Christians, Muslims, Sikhs, Atheists, all died in WW2 and no group deserves more sympathy than any other. For this reason I reject the self aggrandizing label of "Holocaust" Questioning the actual numbers of each group who were killed in a concentration camp is not anti-semitism, nor is it being "a Holocaust denier" The very idea of criminalizing free speech, as they have done in some European states, makes their claims of freedom, completely ludicrous. It is hypocritical to claim to posess freedom of speech and then turn around a criminalize speech.

  • Posted By: PacificGatePost @ 09/28/2009 12:57:47 AM

    Obama gave up a powerful element in the negotiations with Iran.

    Russia continues it???s rhetoric, and there is little chance that Iran's leadership will fall into line on the nuclear arms front.

    http://pacificgatepost.blogspot.com/2009/09/obamas-blunder-on-iran.html

    ----------

  • Posted By: Unoman @ 09/27/2009 8:00:51 PM

    sorry if you could bear with me a bit as I am afraid you may be missing my real point here, let's take 9/11 conspiracy theorists as an example, we know these guys have got their theories and don't want to accept that it was perpetrated by anti-american elements as we all know it, can we say to question it would be a crime ?

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse