SPONSORED BY:

‘Iran Has a Very Clear Choice’

Britain's foreign secretary on nuclear proliferation and the Lockerbie bomber.

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

David Miliband, currently the British foreign secretary and a possible future leader of the Labour Party, sat down last week with NEWSWEEK's Lally Weymouth to defend the release of the Libyan terrorist convicted of the Lockerbie bombing, and to discuss Britain's role in Afghanistan and the upcoming talks with Iran. Excerpts:

WEYMOUTH: The thing that is on everybody's mind here is the release of Abdelbaset al-Megrahi, the Libyan found guilty of the Lockerbie bombing. How could you have released him?
MILIBAND: It was a decision by the Scottish authorities, according to the criminal-justice laws of Scotland.

Did you oppose the decision?
It wasn't for us to interfere. We did not oppose it.

My daughter had a friend who was killed on that plane. I know you had a deal with the United States that he was supposed to stay in jail. Why did you go back on the deal?
We did not go back on any "deal." The passions around the appalling terrorist murders on Pan Am 103 are deeply felt in America and in Britain, and rightly so. That is something that unites us. We are also absolutely clear that the independence of the Scottish judiciary in respect to this decision is something that is separate from those wider considerations.

What did you think of General McChrystal's recent Afghan report?
The McChrystal report says the situation is serious, and we agree with him. He says we need a combined security/economic/political approach, and we agree with him. He says that we need to put the Afghans in the lead of security and of political reconciliation, and we agree with him. He says that it is essential that the Afghan government governs in a clean and not corrupt way because that is vital to retain the confidence of the Afghans as well as the inter-national community, and he is right. What we face is a big task of implementing the strategy.

Are you thinking of lessening your commitment to Afghanistan?
No, we are not. We are absolutely clear that it is essential for our own security that we are there.

Do you wonder why the Obama administration does not say to the American people that what it is really trying to do is not to reform Afghanistan but to control its borders with Pakistan?
It is a 2,600-kilometer border. What we want is [for] the country to be able to defend itself. You are not going to build a 2,600-kilometer electric fence.

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Gone Rogue
Gone Rogue

How Sarah Palin hurts the GOP … and America.

The Decade's Best Quotes
The Decade's Best Quotes

NEWSWEEK's 20/10 Project recalls the lines we'll never forget.

Best Celebrity Mugshots
Best Celebrity Mugshots

10 unforgettable arrest photos from the 2000s.

An Evolutionary Edge
An Evolutionary Edge

How grandmas may play favorites.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Tan Boon Tee @ 09/29/2009 10:54:19 PM


    Yes, one may argue that Iran has a clear choice, but that is only from the standpoint of the West.

    In real fact, it has none. The Tehran regime intends especially to confuse its citizens in order to contain them. They did what they have done so far on specific purpose with definite hidden agenda.

    The world can choose to ignore the leaders and not play into their hands.

  • Posted By: MichaelX @ 09/28/2009 11:22:31 AM

    Did ya think that a "prince fron the east" was'nt going to try to flex his petty little rights? For a country as unstable as Iran, to be allowed to have WMD's , asd publicly claim to "wipe out isreal" have a say in the control of that countries development, iit is a travesty of government. This country's "leader" is a warped individual, who is deluded by the predictions of Nostradamus, to be the "supreme leader" of whatevers left after this moron blows off his entire wad, and leads what? Lets just get rid of both, along with a good majority of the middle east, We can use the radioactive sand as fuel for something, right?

  • Posted By: concerned liberal @ 09/28/2009 10:12:42 AM

    America doesn't have to worry about iran, Israel will handle that little problem for us! Tick, tock less than two years and counting, those bunker busters we sold them were a bargin and will make for the sweetest of party favors for the coming events! hopefully the Israelis will kill a minimum of 5 million to make a sort of statement.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now