SPONSORED BY:

The Hype Is Right

Apple's tablet will reinvent computing.

 
PHOTOS
Apple's Seeds of Innovation

Apple has never been a stranger to temptation. From iMacs to iPods, the 30-year-old computer company has repeatedly set off public frenzies with their cutting edge-and often cutesy-products. As they get consumers buzzing over the newest Mac gadget, a look back at ten landmark moments in Apple history:

 
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

Apple is supposedly working on a tablet computer, and though it doesn't even exist yet, it has already enjoyed more reviews than most products that actually do. Rumor has it that the "iTablet" (my name for it, not Apple's) will be announced in January and released in June. Just as with the company's iPhone a few years ago, blogs have been buzzing about the still-unveiled iTablet for months, featuring pictures of what the iTablet might look like, arguments over the features that the iTablet will have, leaks from partners that Apple has supposedly approached to develop content for the iTablet—you get the idea. It's nuts.

Nevertheless, this device may actually warrant the hype. Not because of the tablet itself but because of what it and others like it could do to the way we tell stories. Veteran editor Tina Brown, who now runs The Daily Beast, says we are about to enter "a golden age of journalism." I agree, and I think tablet devices will hurry that along. (Click here to follow Dan Lyons.)

These devices will play video and music and, of course, display text; they will let you navigate by touching your fingers to the screen; and—this is most important—they will be connected to the Internet at all times. For those of us who carry iPhones, this shift to a persistent Internet has already happened, and it's really profound. The Internet is no longer a destination, someplace you "go to." You don't "get on the Internet." You're always on it. It's just there, like the air you breathe.

Now imagine a larger form factor, with a screen big enough to hold multiple panes of information. It has no lag time and lasts many hours on a battery charge. Here, then, is your new morning newspaper, with videos next to stories and the ability to customize the panes to deliver what you want and leave out what you don't. This device is also your TV, your stereo, and probably your telephone too.

For people like me, who produce content, this change is both great and scary. Great because the techies in Silicon Valley are giving us powerful new tools for telling stories. Scary because the old ways of telling stories are about to become obsolete, and if we cling to them, we'll be washed away. In the past we've all worked in silos. "Print people" had one way of describing the world. "Video people" had another. But the silos are getting crunched together. It's as if for most of your life you could get by speaking only English, but now you need to learn a bunch of other old languages, and, what's more, you must then master a new language that is evolving out of the DNA of all the old ones.

This is phase two of media on the Internet. Until now, in phase one, we've used this new platform to do the same old thing. We take stories from newspapers and magazines and put them on Web sites. We publish books on Kindle. We put TV shows and movies on Hulu or YouTube. This is what happens when a new medium emerges. When TV first came out, the networks hired radio stars like Milton Berle and produced variety shows—radio with a camera. Over time, people like Steven Bochco (Hill Street Blues, L.A. Law), David Chase (The Sopranos), and Larry David (Seinfeld) came along and created a new way of telling stories. Oddly enough, those three guys were born within a few years of each other, in the 1940s, just as TV was getting started.

The Internet today is a lot like TV circa 1950. But we are about to take an evolution-ary leap. That's why all this hand-wringing over the dying newspaper business is so misplaced. In 10 years the print newspapers we have today will seem as quaint and primitive as those old Uncle Miltie shows. Heck, the Internet we have today will seem quaint and primitive too. Chances are the cool stuff won't come from people my age (I'm nearly 50) but from the kids who are growing up with these digital tools the way Bochco, Chase, and David grew up with Uncle Miltie.

I have no idea what the "new news" will look like, but I know it will arrive. Look at how people have turned their creativity loose on the iPhone. In just 16 months, thousands of developers have created 85,000 applications for that device. The same will happen with tablets. These powerful devices with constant Internet access will enable us (and force us) to rethink media. What is a newspaper? What is a book? What is a movie? What is entertainment? Somewhere out there, the Orson Welles of the digital age is in grade school, or maybe high school. Soon he or she will be inventing a new language for telling stories. I can't wait to see what it looks like.

Daniel Lyons is also the author of Options: The Secret Life of Steve Jobs and Dog Days: A Novel .

© 2009

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Gone Rogue
Gone Rogue

How Sarah Palin hurts the GOP … and America.

The Decade's Best Quotes
The Decade's Best Quotes

NEWSWEEK's 20/10 Project recalls the lines we'll never forget.

Best Celebrity Mugshots
Best Celebrity Mugshots

10 unforgettable arrest photos from the 2000s.

An Evolutionary Edge
An Evolutionary Edge

How grandmas may play favorites.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: DaxViggs @ 10/26/2009 7:37:01 PM

    While this all sounds so nice and utopic, there are a few burning issues that keep me from sharing Mr. Lyons' enthusiasm. First: how many people will be priced out of this new revolution? How many people have been priced out of the iPhone revolution? When a revolution comes with a price tag, it's a poor revolution indeed. This relates to my second issue: How long has it been since a new technology has actually delivered the promises that techno-topians envision, and actually enriched our lives or made them easier? Anymore, new technologies are introduced to drive markets, and we are the tools by which they do so. The Personal Computer was supposed to afford us hours and hours more leisure time; yet it turns out we just work longer hours now. The cell phone was supposed to afford us a similar benefit, but now we can never be left alone (especially from our jobs.)

    Yet whenever a new piece of technology comes out, be it from Apple or Microsoft (or any of the other relentless top-down, closed source corporate power structures) our eyes light up, glaze over and we shout "OOOOH SHINY! I HAVE to have it! I CAN'T live without it!"

  • Posted By: Robert1234 @ 10/24/2009 6:33:41 PM

    The guys nuts, just pumping Apple's stocks up. I have no interest in such a device and see no reason to become interested in it. One more "world changing" thing that will fall flat. Sort of like the ...what is it called, that platform on wheels thing...you remember? Oh, Segway. Wasn't that it? I wonder if we'll remember this one? I have no interest in increasing my cost of communication and computing so why would I wish to deal with that philosophy? The fact is, computers are starting to suck and go backwards. I have a 5 year old computer running an Intel Pentium 4, 3MGhz, doubled clock speed, so it runs at about 5.86 MGhz. 5 years old and I can't buy one as fast as this old thing? We're NOT making progress like we should. The U.S. sucks in a lot of ways. Slow internet speed, high internet costs, slow, crappy and expensive cell phones, etc. We're going down and down and down all the time and Americans don't even know it! We're not even a test market any more. Americans buy anything we're told to by the media and they know it. We're not discriminating or even picky. Test stuff elsewhere, Americas will buy it! (Hey, we bought into Bush and Obama, so that proves they were right.)

  • Posted By: thosfiore @ 10/22/2009 12:56:34 AM

    I suspect that Apple will come out with a device that will advance tablet computing through ease of use and a good portal for additional functionality. Microsoft may have a good product themselves with the new table-ish device they are developing. The reinvention that computing requires for what Mr. Lyons is envisioning is a way to get us to pay for content. The revenue model that has developed on the Internet has made information mostly free and what payment there has been is nowhere near what the print media could get before the explosion of the Internet the last decade. I don't see a way that these devices will change the dynamic. Of course, the iPhone has gotten me to spend a couple of hundred dollars more per year for my cell phone but it has truly increased my productivity. I can't envision how an improved tablet will improve productivity to the point where the individual or their employer will pay a substantial fee for connectivity, but maybe that is a failure of imagination on my part.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now