SPONSORED BY:

The Obama-Bush Connection

Obama is a lot more like Bush 43 than anyone involved would readily admit.

 
GALLERY
Famous Nobel Firsts

Barack Obama made headlines. These winners made history.

 
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

George H.W. Bush was delighted with his guest. Last Friday at the 41st president's library on the campus of Texas A&M in College Station, Bush and President Obama met to commemorate the 20th anniversary of the Points of Light service program, part of Bush 41's legacy to the country. Unfailingly polite, Bush wrote the Aggie community before Obama's visit. The note was fairly anodyne, but 41 was worried about an adverse reaction to the incumbent on the largely conservative campus. "Along with the administration, faculty, and so many of you, I am honored that The President, our President, is taking the time and making the effort to come to College Station … This is not about politics."

There is a small grammatical clue here about how deeply Bush felt that Obama was to be treated with courtesy: 41 capitalizes the T in "The President" (and obviously the P) when he wants to invest the office with the highest possible importance and dignity. In the weeks after September 11, in a note to me declining a request for an interview for the magazine, Bush concluded: "Please say a prayer for our beloved son, The President." Now Barack Obama holds ultimate responsibility, and, in Bush's view, deserves ultimate respect.

The common wisdom—a phrase 41 uses more often than "conventional wisdom"—is that Obama is an heir of 41's style, particularly in the diplomatic realm. The storyline is clear: Obama is more like George W. Bush's father than George W. Bush ever was.

Facebook

That argument is at best incomplete and at worst wrong. The Bushes have always been much more complicated than their caricatures. (A word of disclosure: I am at work on a biography of George H.W. Bush.) Bush 41 was a great multilateralist—one of the best ever—but he took a much tougher early stand against Saddam's 1990 invasion of Kuwait than many in Washington, in New York, and around the world. We tend to forget the close-fought nature of the Senate vote authorizing the use of force, when lawmakers like Joe Biden and Sam Nunn opposed the president. And yes, 41 did go to the United Nations to win approval for military action against Saddam, but he was also quite prepared to turn Desert Shield into Desert Storm even if the U.N. vote had gone the other way.

If the first President Bush was more willing to use force than is sometimes remembered, his son was more open to diplomacy, especially in his last years in office, than is virtually ever remembered.

The image of Obama and the senior Bush together brought to mind another moment, long ago. In the wake of the Bay of Pigs in 1961, President Kennedy invited Dwight Eisenhower to Camp David. JFK had won in 1960 by saying we were too complacent at home and were losing ground to the communists abroad. Suddenly, however, once confronted by the complexities of the presidency, Kennedy found that perhaps Eisenhower was not so out of it after all. The photograph of the two men, taken from the back (Ike is carrying his hat), shoulder to shoulder, embodies a truth that remains relevant now: for all the sound and fury of the arena, on big issues American presidents tend to have more in common with one another than one might at first think. There is a presidential character intrinsic to the office. Part of this is because what seemed black and white while you were running looks a lot grayer once ultimate power is yours, and part of it is that the country changes presidents more frequently than the country changes itself. We are a center-right nation politically and culturally, which means we value moderate governance—and we punish those who stray too far one way or the other. (See Clinton in 1993–94, or George W. Bush between roughly 2003 and late 2006.)

Like Bush 41, Obama seems temperamentally incapable of extremism. Now, since the foregoing sentence will make conservatives' heads explode, here is a final point likely to drive liberals to distraction: from Guantánamo to the bailout of the financial system to antiterror tactics, Barack Obama is a lot more like George W. Bush (or at least the George W. Bush of his later years in office) than almost anybody involved—including, I suspect, Obama or Bush 43—would readily admit. At their best, both of them have worked to govern as presidents, not as partisans, which is the way good men have always conducted themselves in that office.

Obama—"The President," in Bush 41's formulation—will always be shouted at and about. But remembering that he, like his predecessors, is working within commonly accepted political boundaries may help put the shouting in context.

Click here to see behind-the-scenes images of President Obama's inauguration and here for a look at how young Barry Obama became the 44th president.

© 2009

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Gone Rogue
Gone Rogue

How Sarah Palin hurts the GOP … and America.

The Decade's Best Quotes
The Decade's Best Quotes

NEWSWEEK's 20/10 Project recalls the lines we'll never forget.

Best Celebrity Mugshots
Best Celebrity Mugshots

10 unforgettable arrest photos from the 2000s.

An Evolutionary Edge
An Evolutionary Edge

How grandmas may play favorites.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: NewsWkDickG @ 11/07/2009 1:06:34 PM

    For eight years the Republican Party strongly and stubbornly supported everything the Bush Administration did as it totally placated and patronized Special Interests and a select few, done with an in-your-face arrogance. Together they irresponsibly and unconscionably encouraged the dishonesty, self-indulgence and neglect that literally contributed to bringing down most systems in this country. The Bush Presidency unapologetically passed a gargantuan mess on to the Obama Presidency and the Republican Party then just attempted to block/obstruct, without any regard for other than their own interests, all efforts to solve problems. Without ever contributing anything positive or constructive they now aggressively criticize the Obama Administration for not totally turning things around in just ten months. Today everyone should be able to recognize the lies, the scare tactics and the appeals to prejudices and emotions, all intended to mislead and manipulate the majority and benefit only the few. Anyone who accepts all of that, who supports the Republicans' efforts and the substantial overt and covert activity of their patrons, aimed to return to 'more of the same', obviously has to be certifiably crazy. Anyone who is willing to ignore the consequences, at the very least, has to be masochistic.

  • Posted By: NewsWkDickG @ 11/06/2009 12:32:01 PM

    I realize I speak only for myself and this is what I see as accurate and being objective. There is so much being said that is based on aggressive appeals to biases, prejudices and selfish interests, all aimed to manipulate and even to purposely mislead the public. Take the criticisms of the Obama Administration as 'tax and spend', 'big government', 'Socialistic' and even (the very bazaar) as 'Communistic'. Any rational viewing has to recognize that Obama literally inherited very extreme and drastic problems that desperately needed considerable and quick action and any honest evaluation would conclude that continuing as was, doing nothing or doing too little would result in things getting worse and that just couldn't be tolerated. It is also very obvious that over the previous eight years everything was steadily going down hill as government demonstrated an unconscionable irresponsibility in offering the majority only total apathy, the costs and substantial subterfuge while they totally focused on benefit for Special Interests and a select few who provided overt and covert support, substantial contributions and promises for after office compensation. It should also be honestly admitted that ever since the switch the Republicans have stubbornly worked to block/obstruct every effort and have offered nothing positive and/or constructive. It is in this light, plus the knowledge that Obama has had only ten months and the Republicans are pushing to return to the disastrous 'more of the same', that the criticisms need to be evaluated. I am a moderate conservative and was a Republican (now Independent) who never voted Democratic between JFK and Al Gore and I always seek to be rational in considering my choices. I have never wanted 'big government' but as I see it today significant and rapid changes are absolutely necessary to bring balance back and then the changes really need time to take full affect. In so many areas drastic action is now desperately needed and to stall corrective efforts with fault finding, especially when with questionable purpose, is ridiculous. Whenever a child is running an excessively high temperature one acts quickly to bring it down, without waiting and worrying about taking it too low. Yes, solutions need to be fine tuned and exit strategies need to be developed but that requires responsible representatives honestly working together and without any selfishly motivated critics. Even when considering the hyped-up scare over raising taxes the reality is that, and no one knows it will be, if we incur a modest increase while experiencing a return to a robust economy, the net take-home could be improved; just ask the person without a job what they think. We need the Republicans to once again become honestly concerned and diligently working for the benefit of the majority and the only way that will ever happen is if we reject what they have become!

  • Posted By: NewsWkDickG @ 11/05/2009 12:56:33 PM

    For eight years the Republican Party strongly and stubbornly supported everything the Bush Administration did as it totally placated and patronized Special Interests and a select few, done with an in-your-face arrogance. Together they irresponsibly and unconscionably encouraged the dishonesty, self-indulgence and neglect that literally contributed to bringing down most systems in this country. The Bush Presidency unapologetically passed a gargantuan mess on to the Obama Presidency and the Republican Party then just attempted to block/obstruct, without any regard for other than their own interests, all efforts to solve problems. Without ever contributing anything positive or constructive they now aggressively criticize the Obama Administration for not totally turning things around in just ten months. Today everyone should be able to recognize the lies, the scare tactics and the appeals to prejudices and emotions, all intended to mislead and manipulate the majority and benefit only the few. Anyone who accepts all of that, who supports the Republicans' efforts with the substantial overt and covert activity of their patrons, aimed to return to 'more of the same', obviously has to be certifiably crazy. Anyone who is willing to ignore the consequences, at the very least, has to be masochistic.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse