I agree with Factsearcher, its unconsionable how you can defend an organization like Hamas. The merits of Goldstone's report are questioned by everyone, look at Dore Gold vs Judge Goldstone Debate at Brandeis. Thurs. Nov 5 at 5 p.m EST. Live webcast... @ http://www.jcpa.org/JCPA/Templates/ShowPage.asp?DRIT=0&DBID=1&LNGID=1&TMID=111&FID=378&PID=0&IID=3123&TTL=Debate_of_the_Year:_Gold_vs._Goldstone
SPONSORED BY:
‘The Issue is Not the Security of Israel But of the World’
The Israeli prime minister on nuclear proliferation and a two-state solution.
Gali Tibbon
/
EPA-Corbis
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
Published Oct 24, 2009
From the magazine issue dated Nov 2, 2009
Email To A Friend
Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.
SPONSORED BY
According to someone who knows Benjamin Netanyahu well, Israel's prime minister views the threat from Iran in stark terms: he sees his mission as protecting the Jewish people from a second Holocaust. Like many Israelis, he is outraged by a U.N. report overseen by former South African judge Richard Goldstone that accuses Israel of war crimes in its invasion of Gaza earlier this year. NEWSWEEK's Lally Weymouth spoke to Netanyahu in Jerusalem last week. Excerpts:
WEYMOUTH: What did you think of the Goldstone report?
NETANYAHU: I thought there were limits to hypocrisy, but I was obviously wrong. The so-called human-rights commission accuses Israel—which legitimately defended itself against Hamas—of war crimes. Mind you, Hamas didn't commit just one type of war crime. It committed four. First, they called for the destruction of Israel, which under the U.N. charter is considered a war crime—incitement to genocide; secondly, they fired deliberately on civilians; third, they hid behind civilians; and fourth, they've been holding our captured soldier Gilad Shalit, without access to the Red Cross, for three years. And who gets accused of criminal behavior at the end of the day?
People here appear to feel the report is very unfair, but some have called for an internal inquiry.
We're looking into that not because of the Goldstone report but because of our own internal needs. The best way to defuse this issue is to speak the truth, because Israel was defending itself with just means against an unjust attack.
Were you surprised that countries like Britain and France did not support Israel?
I think all countries should stand up that are themselves engaged in the war against this brutal terror. Moral clarity is the most important weapon against terror.
What do you think of the Geneva deal that the Obama administration and other Western countries appear to have struck with Iran?
It's too early to say, because the crucial thing is that the international community pressure Iran to stop the enrichment of uranium, which has only one purpose—the development of nuclear--weapons capability.
Someone told me this week that you believe it is your duty to prevent a second Holocaust of the Jewish people.
This has been the sentiment of all the prime ministers of Israel.
But do you feel it particularly in light of the Iranian nuclear threat?
I think right now the issue is not merely the security of Israel but of the world. Free and open societies are menaced by a dark radicalism that is seeking to arm itself and its proxies with nuclear weapons.
Your Arab neighbors say that they are very concerned, too.
There is not—perhaps with one exception, [and] I'm not even sure about that one—a single Arab country that is not concerned by the possibility of a nuclear Iran. And, of course, many of the great powers in Europe understand the danger. This would be a pivot of history if it happened.
- 1
- 2
- Next Page »
Discuss