Rocket Men

Politicians won't get us back into the space race, but novelists just might.

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: jp98slk @ 11/06/2009 11:37:36 PM

    Jeremy - do your homework. "...since long before Alan Shepard reached orbit in his glorified tin can."; Shepard didn't "reach orbit" until Apollo 14 in 1971. His Mercury flight ten years earlier was a 15-minute suborbital test flight. John Glenn holds the honor of first American in orbit.

  • Posted By: reinadelaz @ 11/02/2009 2:30:07 AM

    I am all for research and exploration, but the American people should demand to know the truth about NASA'a contribution to global climate change before one more launch is conducted.

  • Posted By: Ron Paul For Pope @ 11/01/2009 1:05:22 PM

    Also, we'll never travel to the stars using chemical rockets, because it would tens of thousands of years to reach the nearest one with our existing technology. Therefore, it's not even worth pretending that we're "reaching for the stars" with what we've got today.

    If we ever do go there, it'll be in something completely different. The manned space program is a welfare program for NASA and its contractors.

  • Posted By: Ron Paul For Pope @ 11/01/2009 1:01:43 PM

    The cost and visibility associated with manned space missions makes it almost impossible to do anything truly risky or new. The weight and cost of everything, including the launch rocket, is determined by the fact that you have to send these incredibly fragile things out into space...and bring them back. There's no opportunity to see what's over the next Martian horizon, for the sheer hell of it, because your oxygen might run out. Just plant that flag and get back in the ship as soon as possible.

    There is also zero possibility for astronauts to live off the land when they get to the moon or Mars. There's relatively little water, no oxygen, and no food. A permanent presence on either planet would require a steady stream of unmanned cargo ships going to and from the earth. As it is, we regularly have to send up cargo ships to the space station to service two or three people, who can't do anything but go stir-crazy. I'd love to see a detailed plan of how a moon mission would accommodate ten times as many people *and* keep them productive *and* keep them safe over a one-year period.

    Robotic missions would do more to advance both space exploration and the technology of space travel. Our capabilities in radiation-hardened electronics are woefully behind the earthbound state-of-the-art. Robotic missions would also do more to advance artificial intelligence, autonomous robots, and deep-space communications.

  • Posted By: Reg373 @ 11/01/2009 12:49:00 PM

    At 1 Billion per launch, the Shuttle is finally getting retired and Obama's admin will review NASA in a comprehensive way. I don't believe they will fund much beyond unmanned missions in this time of fiscal crisis -- saw a cool site; Balkingpoints ; incredible satellite view of earth

  • Posted By: Pilot08T @ 10/31/2009 6:52:42 PM

    More money shooting junk and people into space, what an obscene waste of money. When the ills confronting the surface of the planet are solved, then head for space.

    • Posted By: Dragoon21b @ 10/31/2009 8:08:58 PM

      Words spoken by someone who if they could would never leave the security and familarity of their own back yard.

      I agree we need star power in some form or other, the days of the test pilot as hero seem to be long gone swept aside in the twin tides of exaggerated ideas of the need for government secrecy and and the 1980's transition of astronauts to an "Everyman" figure...and that is just it if you look at advertising the "Everyman" dosen't sell sports cars or excitement he sells mops and diapers...and who wants to be told (or would believe) that its actualy important to buy more diapers

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse