It is very apparent that they are now in a 'full court press' to market Sarah Palin and hopefully people will just see through it. She has continually demonstrated her numerous character flaws yet admittedly she is cute, entertaining, impressively quick and agile and simply capable of swaying emotions. Of course the problem is she really is totally self-focused, aggressive, arrogant, bold and sociopathic with no conscience to force any guilt and completely capable of easily faking anything. In the McCain campaign she clearly showed how she thinks everything is about her, that she is the center of everything, deserving all of the attention and whatever else she wants, even to shrugging off her subordinate roll, her lack of qualifications and her several goofs, including using her son as a sympathy getting prop - her ego and selfish preoccupation were on full display. She is supported by her backers because, with the same personality and character flaws as GWBush, she offers them the opportunity to satisfy her drive and desires which gives them the control to insure she does their bidding (much like GWBush). The reality is there for any objective and rational viewer to see but maybe an even better insight can be gained in reading Martha Stout's book 'The Sociopath Next Door'. Throughout that book you can gain an understanding and fearful appreciation for the real Sarah Palin and even recognize the real GWBush. If after realizing the true negative potential of Sarah Palin, once reading the book and recalling the GWBush performance, you don't come to dread ever seeing her hold national office, then I can only hope you are one of a very few.
If you really feel compelled to read Sarah Palin's book and would like to get more out of it, I suggest that at the same time you read Martha Stout's book, 'The Sociopath Next Door'. When reading them side by side, each will make the other more understandable and more meaningful.
What Coattails?
Why right-of-center candidates are succeeding in the age of Obama.
Email To A Friend
Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.
All year, leading Democrats from the president on down have argued that the Republican Party is in the midst of a catastrophic civil war. You know the story. Successive election defeats have narrowed the GOP's ideological range, and now an open struggle is afoot for control of its voice and agenda. Rush Limbaugh and Sarah Palin, it seems, are out to destroy Republican moderates and commit the party to a radical course sure to relegate it to irrelevance. Only a move to the left can save the Republicans.
And, in fact, the new president and Congress had a real opportunity to divide the Republican Party. A moderate stimulus bill that offered a short-term boost and included a meaningful tax-cut component, for instance, might have won a very significant number of Republican votes in Congress last winter and launched a damaging internal GOP battle over the proper role of the opposition. Some restraint on taxes and spending in general, and on health care and energy policy in particular, would also have divided congressional Republicans and left the direction of the party in doubt.
But Washington Democrats chose a different route. While they have been peddling the story of Republican self-immolation, they have actually been creating the conditions for a Republican resurgence. President Obama, Speaker Pelosi, and Majority Leader Reid have launched the country on a course of massive spending, a dramatic expansion of government, and a slew of new taxes in the midst of a recession. Finding themselves in control of Congress and the White House and so possessed of an unusual opportunity to pursue their ideological agenda, they have sought to make the most of it. But they have misjudged just how far to the left of the country as a whole the Democratic base now resides—and so, rather than strengthen their own brand, they have inadvertently done wonders to build and unify the Republican Party.
In Congress, Republicans now march nearly as one, to a degree not seen in 15 years. Rather than split on the stimulus, conservative and moderate Republicans easily agreed that it went much too far to the left. The bill received zero Republican votes in the House and just three in the Senate. On many crucial votes since, and in the ongoing health-care and cap-and-trade debates, Republicans have stood together almost unanimously.
Around the country, the party seems to be regaining its balance. Last Tuesday's election results were an extraordinary boost for Republicans. They showed that it is not necessary to run away from the party's conservative brand to win elections. On the contrary, Republicans running as Republicans seem to succeed in the age of Obama, and to attract independent voters in droves.
In Virginia—which went for Obama last year, and elected Democratic -senators in the last two cycles and Democratic governors throughout this decade—-Republican Bob McDonnell ran as a practical conservative with an extensive policy agenda and was elected governor by an enormous 18-point margin. He produced concrete proposals on transportation and education but was also forthright about his conservative views on taxes and his opposition to abortion and gun control. In deeply blue New Jersey, which Obama won last year by double digits, Republican Chris Christie let the incumbent Democrat embrace Obama, refused to run away from his own party, and won the governorship decisively. He, too, is pro-life; he opposed gay marriage and even associated himself with several GOP governors who had refused to accept stimulus funds. Both Republicans won independent voters by roughly a 2-to-1 margin.
In the special election for New York's 23rd Congressional District, Democrat Bill Owens defeated Conservative Party candidate Doug Hoffman a few days after the liberal Republican Dede Scozzafava (who had run to the left of the Democrat on key issues) dropped out of the race. The peculiar circumstances of that contest, with prominent conservatives supporting Hoffman over Scozzafava, have been taken by Democrats eager for good news as proof of a Republican breakdown. The day after the election, White House political adviser David Axelrod even went so far as to say that the victory "should be reassuring to Democrats."
- 1
- 2
- Next Page »










Discuss