SPONSORED BY:

What Coattails?

Why right-of-center candidates are succeeding in the age of Obama.

Creigh Deeds, (left) Bob McDonnell
Win McNamee / Getty Images (left); Steve Helber / AP
Democrat Creigh Deeds, left, lost the Virginia gubernatorial campaign to Republican Bob McDonnell, right.
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

All year, leading Democrats from the president on down have argued that the Republican Party is in the midst of a catastrophic civil war. You know the story. Successive election defeats have narrowed the GOP's ideological range, and now an open struggle is afoot for control of its voice and agenda. Rush Limbaugh and Sarah Palin, it seems, are out to destroy Republican moderates and commit the party to a radical course sure to relegate it to irrelevance. Only a move to the left can save the Republicans.

And, in fact, the new president and Congress had a real opportunity to divide the Republican Party. A moderate stimulus bill that offered a short-term boost and included a meaningful tax-cut component, for instance, might have won a very significant number of Republican votes in Congress last winter and launched a damaging internal GOP battle over the proper role of the opposition. Some restraint on taxes and spending in general, and on health care and energy policy in particular, would also have divided congressional Republicans and left the direction of the party in doubt.

But Washington Democrats chose a different route. While they have been peddling the story of Republican self-immolation, they have actually been creating the conditions for a Republican resurgence. President Obama, Speaker Pelosi, and Majority Leader Reid have launched the country on a course of massive spending, a dramatic expansion of government, and a slew of new taxes in the midst of a recession. Finding themselves in control of Congress and the White House and so possessed of an unusual opportunity to pursue their ideological agenda, they have sought to make the most of it. But they have misjudged just how far to the left of the country as a whole the Democratic base now resides—and so, rather than strengthen their own brand, they have inadvertently done wonders to build and unify the Republican Party.

In Congress, Republicans now march nearly as one, to a degree not seen in 15 years. Rather than split on the stimulus, conservative and moderate Republicans easily agreed that it went much too far to the left. The bill received zero Republican votes in the House and just three in the Senate. On many crucial votes since, and in the ongoing health-care and cap-and-trade debates, Republicans have stood together almost unanimously.

Around the country, the party seems to be regaining its balance. Last Tuesday's election results were an extraordinary boost for Republicans. They showed that it is not necessary to run away from the party's conservative brand to win elections. On the contrary, Republicans running as Republicans seem to succeed in the age of Obama, and to attract independent voters in droves.

In Virginia—which went for Obama last year, and elected Democratic -senators in the last two cycles and Democratic governors throughout this decade—-Republican Bob McDonnell ran as a practical conservative with an extensive policy agenda and was elected governor by an enormous 18-point margin. He produced concrete proposals on transportation and education but was also forthright about his conservative views on taxes and his opposition to abortion and gun control. In deeply blue New Jersey, which Obama won last year by double digits, Republican Chris Christie let the incumbent Democrat embrace Obama, refused to run away from his own party, and won the governorship decisively. He, too, is pro-life; he opposed gay marriage and even associated himself with several GOP governors who had refused to accept stimulus funds. Both Republicans won independent voters by roughly a 2-to-1 margin.

In the special election for New York's 23rd Congressional District, Democrat Bill Owens defeated Conservative Party candidate Doug Hoffman a few days after the liberal Republican Dede Scozzafava (who had run to the left of the Democrat on key issues) dropped out of the race. The peculiar circumstances of that contest, with prominent conservatives supporting Hoffman over Scozzafava, have been taken by Democrats eager for good news as proof of a Republican breakdown. The day after the election, White House political adviser David Axelrod even went so far as to say that the victory "should be reassuring to Democrats."

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Visions of a Decade
Visions of a Decade

From 2000-2009, one photo per month.

The Failure of Copenhagen
The Failure of Copenhagen

Why there could be a silver lining in a failed climate treaty.

Sex Scandals of the 2000s
Sex Scandals of the 2000s

From John Edwards to Mark Sanford, the decade's memorable affairs.

118 Days in Hell
118 Days in Hell

A NEWSWEEK journalist recounts his captivity in Iran.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: NewsWkDickG @ 11/27/2009 10:22:09 AM

    Calling all Republicans. Here is a challenge, a request, and an honest question ... simply what have the Republicans indicated they would do to straighten out the problems? All it seems they have demonstrated is that they have no answers, nothing to offer, and only want to return to 'more of the same', the 'same' that got us the problems. We hear all about what they think the Democrats are doing wrong and we see them aggressively and stubbornly do all they can to obstruct / block everything ... but what detailed answers do they propose? It is easy and without risk to just criticize and to offer nothing positive or constructive, so let's hear what action, real action not just rhetoric, that the Republicans offer, without even referencing the Democrats. Saying that they wouldn't do what the Democrats want to do (direct criticism) or just saying they would do different than this or that (indirect criticism) is just a cop-out, is actually meaningless and is literally admitting they have no constructive course of action. From 2001 thru 2008 we saw Bush-Cheney totally and arrogantly focus on placating and patronizing Special Interests and a select few while they unconscionably and irresponsibly neglected everything else, giving only apathy, the costs and an abundance of subterfuge to the average American. We know how costly that was and 'more of the same' just won't cut it. So what positive action does the Republican Party advocate ... and being general / vague would again just be deceptive garbage. How they expect anyone to identify with their position when it is only being unified to criticize and stubborn in offering nothing is beyond me. All they seem to offer and try to rationalize is 'more of the same, the 'same' that Bush-Cheney provided and that really is totally unacceptable. What they need to present is concrete action that is defined and that could possibly make a real difference, and not just rhetoric faulting the Democrats and avoiding presenting anything that could be evaluated or worse could be seen as just being 'more of the same'. Let's hear what specific actions people think the Republicans have actually and sincerely offered. Remember, being vague or general doesn't really mean anything; it is only more of the subterfuge as is the fault finding.

  • Posted By: NewsWkDickG @ 11/23/2009 2:41:45 PM

    There really wasn't any 'Maverick' and there sure isn't any 'Rogue' but rather just common place BS'rs who are always arrogantly self-focused and trying to manipulate public opinion. For near forty years I was a Republican, having voted for JFK and not for another Democrat until voting against GWBush. It has literally become totally insulting now in what they expect us to accept and believe. Worse, as Bush-Cheney proved so completely, it costs us greatly as they unconscionably and irresponsibly focus on serving Special Interests and a select few, who overtly and covertly support them, provide them significant contributions and after-office compensation, while the majority is given only apathy, the costs and an abundance of subterfuge. In the 2000 campaign I recognized GWBush's arrogant, self-indulgent, 'in your face' cocky and grossly dishonest, without conscience, sociopathic style and there was no way I could ever vote for him. After three years with Bush-Cheney I felt compelled to change my registration to 'Undeclared Party'. By 2008 near everyone had enough and recognized the drastic growing costs and Obama then inherited the total mess. Since then the Republican Party has steadfastly and irresponsibly, while demanding and coercing Party unity, just attempted to block/obstruct every effort to solve problems, being evident even in their word-for-word repetition of their scripted and often bazaar rationalizations. They literally freely use scare tactics, appeals to people's biases and prejudices and attempts to excite emotions without regard for truth or harm. They fault 'liberalism' and try to hide behind the disguise of 'conservatism' while they offer absolutely nothing. The fact is this country now has to spend liberally to recover from the neglect and irresponsibility of many years, obvious in our decaying infrastructure, the troubled economy, the status of most systems and that only a few ever benefit, with the rich getting obnoxiously richer, the poor getting ashamedly poorer and the middle-class continually losing ground - a status they want to maintain. And now what are they doing but aggressively trying to market another 'puppet' to continue with 'more of the same'. Sarah Palin offers only another arrogant, self-indulgent, 'in your face' cocky and grossly dishonest, without conscience, sociopathic style that again would do the bidding of a few as they satisfied her self-interests. With her and the likes of Jon Kyl, Michael Steele, John Boehner, Mitch McConnell, John McCain and others who just want to serve the interests of a few and simply con the public, seeking to return to 'more of the same', the Republican Party is drastically out of line - and the only way to get them back is to reject what they have become. We desperately need all of our representatives to be honestly responsible and to be willing to work together in the best interests of the people, all of the people and not just for the few!

  • Posted By: NewsWkDickG @ 11/21/2009 1:28:39 PM

    It is very apparent that they are now in a 'full court press' to market Sarah Palin and hopefully people will just see through it. She has continually demonstrated her numerous character flaws yet admittedly she is cute, entertaining, impressively quick and agile and simply capable of swaying emotions. Of course the problem is she really is totally self-focused, aggressive, arrogant, bold and sociopathic with no conscience to force any guilt and completely capable of easily faking anything. In the McCain campaign she clearly showed how she thinks everything is about her, that she is the center of everything, deserving all of the attention and whatever else she wants, even to shrugging off her subordinate roll, her lack of qualifications and her several goofs, including using her son as a sympathy getting prop - her ego and selfish preoccupation were on full display. She is supported by her backers because, with the same personality and character flaws as GWBush, she offers them the opportunity to satisfy her drive and desires which gives them the control to insure she does their bidding (much like GWBush). The reality is there for any objective and rational viewer to see but maybe an even better insight can be gained in reading Martha Stout's book 'The Sociopath Next Door'. Throughout that book you can gain an understanding and fearful appreciation for the real Sarah Palin and even recognize the real GWBush. If after realizing the true negative potential of Sarah Palin, once reading the book and recalling the GWBush performance, you don't come to dread ever seeing her hold national office, then I can only hope you are one of a very few.

    If you really feel compelled to read Sarah Palin's book and would like to get more out of it, I suggest that at the same time you read Martha Stout's book, 'The Sociopath Next Door'. When reading them side by side, each will make the other more understandable and more meaningful.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now