SPONSORED BY:

Fareed Zakaria

The Rise of the Right

It's really a return to the center.

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Visions of a Decade
Visions of a Decade

From 2000-2009, one photo per month.

The Failure of Copenhagen
The Failure of Copenhagen

Why there could be a silver lining in a failed climate treaty.

Sex Scandals of the 2000s
Sex Scandals of the 2000s

From John Edwards to Mark Sanford, the decade's memorable affairs.

118 Days in Hell
118 Days in Hell

A NEWSWEEK journalist recounts his captivity in Iran.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: NewsWkDickG @ 11/18/2009 12:21:58 PM

    The Republicans are consistently being aggressive and grossly dishonest, even using bazaar and irresponsible statements, all without any conscience in their efforts to excite emotions and control public opinion. They demand total loyalty and unity from their representatives, coerced with threats and evidenced in their word-for-word repetition of their scripted messages. In it all they are belligerent and 'in your face' arrogant, which at best is disgusting. The American people should literally be offended by all of it yet many accept the subterfuge and simply use it to rationalize their predetermined positions. How very short some memories are (reference Bush-Cheney 2000-2008). What is really needed is responsible bipartisan fine-tuning of the proposals and efforts, and not poorly disguised self-focused obstructionist efforts to return to 'more of the same', the 'same' that cost us so much and would now again promise only more benefit for Special Interests and the select few, once more paid for by the majority. That is ridiculous!

  • Posted By: Newshound98 @ 11/17/2009 8:28:26 PM

    Dr. Zakaria, Exactly to what "Republican Party" are you referring? What I see is something more resembling a cult of the convinced than a viable, virile political party, and the popularity of Sarah Palin only proves my point. Bedrock intellectual conservative thought from the likes of Gingrich, Krauthheimer and Kristol have been relegated to whispers in the wind and a severe and restrictive litmus test (social policy plus virulent anti-Obamism) has forced otherwise moderate or center-right conservatives in office to appease the ultras in their party or leave. That a true patriot and non-dogmatic candidate like John McCain could not marshall the support of his own party against a Democrat opponent who was easily the most polarizing presidential candidate in recent memory, simply confirms that the Republican Party that we all knew (and some of us loved) - offering a true and responsible alternative vision of governance - has been hi-hacked by its most radical element. Absent monumental mistakes in policy or performance by the Obama administration or a massive and unpredictable event from within or without, I cannot see the Republican Party marshalling enough commitment from its mianstream members to have much of an impact in 2010 or 2012. Now, the Independents,,,that's a whole 'nuther story, The country is ripe for the emergence of one or two new political parties, made up of IIndependents and disaffected Republicans and Democrats (make no mistake, there are a lot of them around, too!).

  • Posted By: NewsWkDickG @ 11/15/2009 11:24:44 AM

    Michael Moore once described his impression of the average Democrat and it created the picture of a fairly down-to-earth, family oriented individual, who you might think had a dog, liked kids, enjoyed bowling, was pretty easy going, was considerate of others, valued honesty and, the weakness, gave in to others pretty easily. Now that is obviously an over simplification but the point may be well taken that the different political values may tend to draw different common personalities. Even being moderately liberal seems to infer a conscience that dictates more concern for others and accepting more responsibility for the world, while conservatism can be seen as implying a stricter, more self-focused, aggressive and, the fault, a lack of any real community conscience (even in it being seen as a weakness). Taking it one step further, whether liberal or conservative, it should be recognized that any honest and conscience driven person is at a disadvantage when dealing with a person who has no conscience and is easily dishonest. While one is waiting for understanding the other is simply walking away with the goods. Really there are only two ways for an honest person to deal with a dishonest person: one, trying to compete with them and hoping to be successful at being more dishonest than they are (i.e., playing their game), which rarely works; and two, tell them what you expect and will tolerate, bargain no further and accept nothing less. In the early stages the results can favor the dishonest person but as time and the negatives progress, the recognition comes, the patience wanes and the strength gains with the honest person then confidently becoming more firm. Which do you prefer to represent you? First, I am not implying that all Republicans are dishonest by any means yet I do really see a current trend for it to be more tolerated there (maybe just in their several sociopathic personalities). Second, I think the answer is in what does your conscience dictate; what can you live with and are you susceptible to the con, to the manipulative appeal to your self-interests, and then are you concerned for only immediate individual gain or instead looking at being responsible, including to future generations? Personally, I'd like to see honesty and compassion, responsibility and integrity be the standard for both parties and for all representatives - we the voters are the only ones that can force that to happen.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now