A Better Solution - A Different Direction
The goal is survival, food and good health.
The goal is not investment, opportunities, and new technology.
There is no need for a UN Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen in December. They have no power to implement change and they only have a draft without details on how to proceed.
On Sept 24, 2009 Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi, the Libyan leader reminded the world that when the nations signed the UN Preamble, details had to be filled in later. The later details did not line up with what the nations signed on to. It will be the same with this treaty.
??? is against gathering of nations for leadership, wisdom, protection and provision. Each nation has ??? for all things if they use the wisdom He sent to them.
Psalm 2: 4, 5 ???He that sits in the heavens shall laugh: the Lord shall have them in derision. :5 Then shall He speak to them in His wrath, and vex them in His sore displeasure."
Climate Change is about the destruction man is making on the planet through the employment system. To cap some present businesses and promote others in the rest of the undeveloped world has no wisdom or effectiveness. It is an empty promise to gain control of nations. None of their efforts stop destruction of the planet from pollution, disease or war.
There is a simple SOLUTION. "Retire." Back out of our unnecessary employment lifestyle and turn to create a garden paradise lifestyle with each family choosing trees, plants and pets that provide fresh food around them. It is an abundant life with families together with true freedom and independence. It is the ONLY SOLUTION and it is sustainable through eternity.
The garden paradise lifestyle is a solution to world problems of climate change, pollution, energy crisis, war, immigration, reoccurring financial crises, disease, poverty, inequality, crime and social programs etc. It is quick, easy, fair and inexpensive. There is no need for the Copenhagen Climate Change Conference in December.
Send Twitter: Any candidate, political party, God???s solutions to overcome problems at US, UN, EU, NATO, ME Quartet, at Divine-Way.com FREE
The Copenhagen Treaty Explained, Part 1. PRE-SUPPOSITIONS IT EMPLOYS TO DEMAND ESTABLISHMENT OF ONE-WORLD GOVERNMENT
http://thepostnemail.wordpress.com/2009/11/09/the-copenhagen-treaty-explained-%e2%80%94-part-i/#comment-2251
The Copenhagen Treaty Explained, Part 2
OBLIGES MEMBER STATES TO ACCEPT A PROCESS OF INDOCTRINATION AND CONTROL WHICH WILL FORCE CONSENT TO FUTURE PROPOSALS
http://thepostnemail.wordpress.com/2009/11/11/the-copenhagen-treaty-explained-%e2%80%94-part-ii/
Countdown to Copenhagen
Email To A Friend
Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.
Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd has bulletproof green credentials—his first act as P.M. was to sign the Kyoto Protocol, forcing his country to slash carbon emissions. In December he'll play a key role in negotiating Kyoto's successor at the Copenhagen climate-change conference. He spoke with Newsweek's Barrett Sheridan about the global talks. Excerpts:
What needs to happen at Copenhagen for it to be considered a success?
I believe that we need, at a minimum, a political agreement that includes targets on the part of developed countries and commitments on the part of developing countries.
What's the distinction between "targets" and "commitments"?
In the Bali road map, which was agreed on two years ago, those who were responsible for the accumulated stock of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere—the developed countries—would face binding targets for reduction of total emissions. For developing economies, the commitments refer to verifiable actions to bring down their greenhouse-gas emissions below a "business as usual" level.
What else do you hope for in a Copenhagen agreement?
An appropriate set of financing arrangements to support adaptation and mitigation for the poorest developing countries, such as low-lying atoll states like Kiribati and Tuvalu. On top of that, you'd need a political agreement on deforestation. And then finally, you need language which supports real technology transfer.
I assume you mean sharing alternative-energy technologies with the developing world.
That's true. My own view is that it is important that the global economy regard many of these technologies as public goods, rather than simply private markets. Remember what we're looking at is large-scale -systemic market failure.
China and India have stymied past climate-change discussions, but have lately made encouraging statements. Is this just public relations, or do you sense a real change of heart?
My view is that both leaderships have an open mind on what will be necessary to secure a comprehensive, global deal. But it's still very fluid.
- 1
- 2
- Next Page »
Discuss