SPONSORED BY:

Could This Lump Power the Planet?

Scientists at Lawrence Livermore National Lab are betting $3.5 billion in taxpayer money on a tiny pellet that could produce an endless supply of safe, clean energy. For some, that's hard to swallow.

llnl.gov
This target chamber is 10 meters in diameter and weighs 287,000 pounds.
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

It doesn't look like much from the outside—just a drab, 10-story building on the campus of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, about an hour's drive east of San Francisco. But as I'm walking across the parking lot on a sunny day in October I can't help thinking that someday I might be telling my grandchildren about the time I came to this lab and met Edward Moses and saw the technology that was about to change the world.

Close Your video will begin in seconds

Sum Total: Being Green Isn’t New

Maybe this means I'm an optimist. Or even a sucker; a fool. All I know is that when I meet Moses, the 60-year-old scientist who runs this place, and he shows me a tiny pellet, about the size of the multivitamin I take every morning, and swears it will provide an endless supply of safe, clean energy, I want to believe him. It seems so ridiculously simple, so utterly doable. The pellet Moses holds is a model, but the real version will contain a few milligrams of deuterium and tritium, isotopes of hydrogen that can be extracted from water. If you blast the pellet with a powerful laser, you can create a reaction like the one that takes place at the center of the sun. Harness that reaction, and you've created a star on earth, and with the heat from that star you can generate electricity without creating any pollution. Forget about nuke plants, coal, oil, or wind and solar. "This is the real solar power," says Moses.

What Moses is talking about is controlled nuclear fusion—fusing nuclei rather than splitting a nucleus, as happens in ordinary nuclear-fission power plants. In a fission reaction, the nucleus of a uranium atom is split into two smaller atoms, releasing energy in the form of heat. The heat is used to make steam, which drives a turbine and generates electricity. In fusion energy, the second half of this process (heat makes steam makes electricity) remains the same. But instead of splitting the nucleus of an atom, you're trying to force a deuterium nucleus to merge, or fuse, with a tritium nucleus. When that happens, you produce helium and throw off energy.

Scientists have been trying to produce energy with fusion for decades. So far, they keep failing. It's not that fusion itself can't be achieved. Fusion takes place in every hydrogen-bomb explosion. The trick is controlling fusion so that instead of a one-time blast you get a series of tiny, controllable explosions. The joke is that fusion energy is only 40 years away, and will always be only 40 years away.

Moses believes, however, that his lab, which is called the National Ignition Facility, or NIF, has cracked the problem. The big challenge fusion has faced is lack of power. Even the biggest lasers in the world could not generate enough energy to smash nuclei together and make them stick. But the reason the building we're in is so huge—it covers the area of three football fields—is that it contains an enormous laser, or actually a system that combines 192 identical lasers and zaps them into a round chamber, about 30 feet in diameter, where the tiny pellet of fuel awaits the blast. NIF's laser, which took a decade to build and was completed earlier this year, can produce 60 times more energy than any other laser ever built. Right now it's still being tested. But next year Moses and his scientists will fire it up with a full load of deuterium-tritium fuel, and Moses feels confident it will achieve "ignition," meaning a controlled burn in which you get out more energy than you put in. Moses, an award-winning laser scientist with a wry sense of humor, explains the whole thing as he leads me on a tour through the NIF facility. It's a vast, beautiful, awe-inspiring machine, mind-blowing in its complexity, with miles of metal tubes—all part of a system that starts with a tiny pulse of light, channels that light through machines that amplify its intensity and rocket the beam along using specially grown crystals and thousands of lenses and mirrors, and finally focuses these beams down to hit a target that is the size of a peppercorn—all in one millionth of a second.

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Gone Rogue
Gone Rogue

How Sarah Palin hurts the GOP … and America.

The Decade's Best Quotes
The Decade's Best Quotes

NEWSWEEK's 20/10 Project recalls the lines we'll never forget.

Best Celebrity Mugshots
Best Celebrity Mugshots

10 unforgettable arrest photos from the 2000s.

An Evolutionary Edge
An Evolutionary Edge

How grandmas may play favorites.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: KnowNothingInMontana @ 11/19/2009 12:06:51 PM

    Electric lights? Humbug! I will invest in whale oil for my light like generations before me. After all, we cannot reproduce what we observe every day (the Sun) and every night (the Stars). The idea that scientists and engineers can invent something that is useful and changes the world almost overnight is just crazy. Lets invest the $3.5 in whale hunting, we'll never run out of them!

  • Posted By: regimbalc @ 11/18/2009 9:21:48 PM

    Daniel Lyons article expresses high expectations for the power of the future using fusion technology. I hope this technology can develop and mature into reasonable power plants. The technology is short sighted though. Fusion will just become a less polluting, more abundant source of heat to power a 400 year old technology ??? steam. Steam generation plants at best might turn 32 percent of the total heat generated into electricity. The other 68 percent is dumped into our environment. With an essentially unlimited supply of heat, and multiple copies of these power plants, the waste heat dumped will be enormous, possibly environmentally damaging. There needs to be research into technology that converts energy sources directly into electricity, increasing power production efficiency three fold. Maybe fusion can be that source. If not, it is just another hot box for making steam.

    Charles Regimbal

  • Posted By: Mark Goldes @ 11/18/2009 3:13:10 PM

    This is one of the greatest boondoggles of all time. Essentially a hydrogen bomb program it cannot ever produce cost-competitive energy.

    Our love affair with the automobile has brought about remarkable new ways to sharply reduce the need for fossil fuel. Regardless of belief about climate change, almost everyone can agree on the economic benefits that make it important to move beyond oil.

    Revolutionary new technology will make possible electric cars that need no recharge - as well as hybrid engines that might need to be fueled with only one gallon of water for each thousand miles of driving.

    Little known breakthroughs promise to lead to cars and trucks that need no fossil fuel or recharge. Later, advanced versions can become power plants when parked, wirelessly selling electricity to the local utility. Such cars would pay for themselves over time. They also can replace any need to build new power plants.

    The science is new, and will understandably be greeted with widespread disbelief and skepticism.
    However, independent laboratory validation of one extraordinary breakthrough has taken place at Rowan University. It produced more heat than can be explained by textbooks, clearly suggesting a new source of energy is involved. The experiments can and should be widely reproduced.

    They suggest one barrel of water will replace 200 barrels of oil!

    For additional information: 4 Steps to Revive the Auto industry and the Economy http://www.aesopinstitute.org

    Radically new technologies can let the love affair with vehicles change much of what is currently believed about energy.

    The key question would seem to be: How best to accelerate the process?

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now