SPONSORED BY:

The Next Big Crisis

How the forthcoming state and local budget crises could slow down the American economy.

Takaaki Iwabu / The News & Observer-AP
Department of Correction employees at a rally to oppose mandatory unpaid furloughs announced by N.C. Gov. Beverly Perdue last week.
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

It's a lagging indicator's lagging indicator, and one that could give the economy a kick in the shins just as it's getting back on its feet. Even though growth is picking up and the nation could add jobs as early as this spring, many cities and states won't hit financial bottom until as much as three years from now, which will add thousands to unemployment rolls and slow the recovery locally.

Since local governments get most of their money from income and property taxes, high unemployment and precipitous drops in real estate values take a large bite out of revenue, but there is typically a lag of between one and three years as taxes are collected on the previous year's income and property values are reassessed. And unlike the federal government, which can help to drive growth by running deficits, most state and local budgets are required to balance their budgets, meaning that layoffs, steep cuts in public services, or tax increases could be on the horizon nationwide.

"I think this is one of those sleeper issues—essentially these shortfalls will translate into 'anti-stimulus'," says Ethan Pollack, a policy analyst at the Economic Policy Institute, who estimates the combined shortfalls for state and local governments at $469 billion over the next three fiscal years. "At the best, that can lead to a protracted, slow, jobless recovery, and at the worst, a double-dip recession."

The beginnings of that wave are being felt in places like Bossier City, La., a town of about 65,000 across the Red River from Shreveport. Facing a deficit of about $6.5 million in its operating budget, Bossier City passed a 2010 budget this month that cuts 80 positions—including 45 posts in the fire and police departments—and institutes a 15 percent reduction in operating expenses across departments. (The actual number of laid-off workers is 46, because many of the eliminated positions were vacant.)

The cuts were controversial in the city, with citizens filling council meetings, and some city officials spoke out against the layoffs. "Unfortunately, the city's got to take this sort of action in order to balance the budget," says city spokesman Mark Natale. "It's certainly a hard decision, but like many entities, city government isn't immune to budget cuts."

Other cities are going to have to make similar painful cuts. Because previous downturns were less severe, governments were able to make up for shortfalls by trimming around the edges and cutting down on less-essential services. Now, like Bossier City, some cash-strapped cities are even cutting down on usually sacrosanct police and fire services. "There are some questions for communities out there about what they want their community to look like," says Chris Hoene, director of research at the National League of Cities. "Should the city provide just public safety, or are they concerned about quality-of-life issues? You're looking at having libraries, schools, and city governments that are only open four days per week."

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: get_involved @ 01/11/2010 12:47:42 AM

    So Why Is Our Government STILL Bringing In 1.5 MILLION Foreign Workers A Year?
    http://www.americanworker.org/

  • Posted By: armchair @ 01/01/2010 11:53:14 PM

    You are joking,right?

  • Posted By: jlgab @ 12/31/2009 11:33:39 AM

    2009 has been a great year. Felony crimes in New York City and Washington DC are at their lowest levels in many years. Home sales and spending are on the rise. Despite the Republican's attempt to make the economy fail like boycotting GM. Because GOP's are Anti-American/Anti-Government, and because they are pissed their candidate didn't win (sore losers) they would put American workers out of jobs by not buying from them. Not very Patriotic of the Republicans now is it? Of course, it also wasn't very patriotic of GOP's to re-elect Bush (after he lied to start a war in Iraq) or to vote for McCain (who condoned a corrupt war in Iraq) and then send then children off to a nice, safe, fun college instead of enlist them in the military. If Republican's want to be war-mongols, the LEAST thing they could do is back up their vote and send their kids to war. Everyone is happier, oh, except the whiny sore losing GOP's who hate everything and want to make it sound like 2009 was so bad.

    How can Obama be responsible for an attempted terrorist attack when that dimwit Bush was not responsible for ALLOWING 11 terrorists on planes? Idiots!

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

Newsweek on Digg