If I am not mistaken, mayors have armed security protecting them and their families. If I had armed security protecting me and my family, I wouldn't need a handgun for protection either. If the mayor does away with his security detail, I might turn in my guns. Not! Just because he lives in a safe, secure enviornment doesn't mean we all of do. When he moves his family into the barrio or ghetto for awhile, he will finally realize why a handgun for protection at home is a necessity!
Taking Aim at D.C.’s Gun Law
A wealthy libertarian is bankrolling a challenge to D.C.’s gun regulations—the most restrictive in the country. What drives him—and his take on whether the case will go to the Supreme Court.
Jul 30, 2007
Member Comments
-
Posted By: lesspain @ 07/01/2008 7:05:23 PM
-
Posted By: thehappyamerican @ 06/27/2008 5:56:50 PM
Mayor Fenty would never consider how many people got murdered or maimed because they couldn't protect themselves. Would he consider it HIS duty to suffer a criminal attack defencelessley in keeping with his socialist views?You just let the criminal attack you in the name of keeping the total violence and insult to society minimal?
I think he's another Liberal in a suit modeling stupidity for us! There's a surplus of them! And of violence surounding them like buzzing flies.
Thats not a coincidence.
Report Abuse
Enter comments if any for reporting abuse
- Black Friday should unleash pent-up demand. Analyst Bill DreherNYT
- The task is to restore our conservative bona fides James Bopp Jr. on a 10-pt GOP checklist NYT
- Twenty five years feels right in my bones and right in my spirit. Oprah on ending her showCST
- It’s going to be a holy war Orrin Hatch on debate over the Senate health billNYT
- The nation and the world will see him for the coward he is Holder, on trying KSMAP
Discuss