In an age where parents are having less and less children, I feel this article is totally irrelevant. Back when families had 3 or more children, the oldest would probably be the smartest simply because they had the responsibility of taking care of the younger children and watching out for them. They set examples and made sure they were on the right patch. Now with families getting smaller, there is less of a need for them to be as responsible and more of a likelihood that either child (considering the family has 2) has the possibility of being more intelligent. If this test is compared with old tests, the data will be skewed. I don't really see a relevance of making the comparison in this day and age. With the changing times and advances in technology, the younger you are the better off you are to learn these new technologies. If anything, it errs on the side of the younger child.









Discuss