I have asked this question for several years but have not received an answer. How do you justify a ranking system that can be so easily manipulated by the allocation of funds for test taking. With no regard for quality education I could allocate $75,000 to allow every student in our 1,000 pupil high school to take at least one test. That would be 1,000 divided by roughly 250 for a 4.0 ranking. Hypothetically every score could be a 1 (out of 5 on AP test) and we would race to the front of the class for this single metric. Yet if the same school took 400 tests and all were scored at a 3 or higher and students paid for their own test so I could keep all of the teachers that would be a 1.6 ranking. I will take the 1.6 and live with the lower ranking. I believe Jay Matthews has sold you a bill of goods that defies common sense and it is indefensible that you keep publishing these rankings that are so meaningless. Jim O'Neill Superintendent of Schools, Chatham, NJ 07928. joneill@chatham-nj.org
Discuss