(Rethinking) Gender

A growing number of Americans are taking their private struggles with their identities into the public realm. How those who believe they were born with the wrong bodies are forcing us to re-examine what it means to be male and female.

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

Growing up in Corinth, Miss., J. T. Hayes had A legacy to attend to. His dad was a well-known race-car driver and Hayes spent much of his childhood tinkering in the family's greasy garage, learning how to design and build cars. By the age of 10, he had started racing in his own right. Eventually Hayes won more than 500 regional and national championships in go-kart, midget and sprint racing, even making it to the NASCAR Winston Cup in the early '90s. But behind the trophies and the swagger of the racing circuit, Hayes was harboring a painful secret: he had always believed he was a woman. He had feminine features and a slight frame—at 5 feet 6 and 118 pounds he was downright dainty—and had always felt, psychologically, like a girl. Only his anatomy got in the way. Since childhood he'd wrestled with what to do about it. He'd slip on "girl clothes" he hid under the mattress and try his hand with makeup. But he knew he'd find little support in his conservative hometown.

In 1991, Hayes had a moment of truth. He was driving a sprint car on a dirt track in Little Rock when the car flipped end over end. "I was trapped upside down, engine throttle stuck, fuel running all over the racetrack and me," Hayes recalls. "The accident didn't scare me, but the thought that I hadn't lived life to its full potential just ran chill bumps up and down my body." That night he vowed to complete the transition to womanhood. Hayes kept racing while he sought therapy and started hormone treatments, hiding his growing breasts under an Ace bandage and baggy T shirts.

Finally, in 1994, at 30, Hayes raced on a Saturday night in Memphis, then drove to Colorado the next day for sex-reassignment surgery, selling his prized race car to pay the tab. Hayes chose the name Terri O'Connell and began a new life as a woman who figured her racing days were over. But she had no idea what else to do. Eventually, O'Connell got a job at the mall selling women's handbags for $8 an hour. O'Connell still hopes to race again, but she knows the odds are long: "Transgendered and professional motor sports just don't go together."

To most of us, gender comes as naturally as breathing. We have no quarrel with the "M" or the "F" on our birth certificates. And, crash diets aside, we've made peace with how we want the world to see us—pants or skirt, boa or blazer, spiky heels or sneakers. But to those who consider themselves transgender, there's a disconnect between the sex they were assigned at birth and the way they see or express themselves. Though their numbers are relatively few—the most generous estimate from the National Center for Transgender Equality is between 750,000 and 3 million Americans (fewer than 1 percent)—many of them are taking their intimate struggles public for the first time. In April, L.A. Times sportswriter Mike Penner announced in his column that when he returned from vacation, he would do so as a woman, Christine Daniels. Nine states plus Washington, D.C., have enacted antidiscrimination laws that protect transgender people—and an additional three states have legislation pending, according to the Human Rights Campaign. And this month the U.S. House of Representatives passed a hate-crimes prevention bill that included "gender identity." Today's transgender Americans go far beyond the old stereotypes (think "Rocky Horror Picture Show"). They are soccer moms, ministers, teachers, politicians, even young children. Their push for tolerance and acceptance is reshaping businesses, sports, schools and families. It's also raising new questions about just what makes us male or female.

What is gender anyway? It is certainly more than the physical details of what's between our legs. History and science suggest that gender is more subtle and more complicated than anatomy. (It's separate from sexual orientation, too, which determines which sex we're attracted to.) Gender helps us organize the world into two boxes, his and hers, and gives us a way of quickly sizing up every person we see on the street. "Gender is a way of making the world secure," says feminist scholar Judith Butler, a rhetoric professor at University of California, Berkeley. Though some scholars like Butler consider gender largely a social construct, others increasingly see it as a complex interplay of biology, genes, hormones and culture.

Genesis set up the initial dichotomy: "Male and female he created them." And historically, the differences between men and women in this country were thought to be distinct. Men, fueled by testosterone, were the providers, the fighters, the strong and silent types who brought home dinner. Women, hopped up on estrogen (not to mention the mothering hormone oxytocin), were the nurturers, the communicators, the soft, emotional ones who got that dinner on the table. But as society changed, the stereotypes faded. Now even discussing gender differences can be fraught. (Just ask former Harvard president Larry Summers, who unleashed a wave of criticism when he suggested, in 2005, that women might have less natural aptitude for math and science.) Still, even the most diehard feminist would likely agree that, even apart from genitalia, we are not exactly alike. In many cases, our habits, our posture, and even cultural identifiers like the way we dress set us apart.

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Al Gore's Climate-Change Evolution
Al Gore's Climate-Change Evolution

Using emotion to convince people to change.

Heaven Can Wait
Heaven Can Wait

A new book promises proof of eternal life.

The World's Biggest Foods
The World's Biggest Foods

Monster edibles from around America.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: drewand @ 09/01/2009 7:44:17 AM

    Be vat you is, not what you not. Folks who de is are da happiest lot. -Tudor Turtle

  • Posted By: JeanAkouri @ 08/31/2009 7:52:58 AM

    The world would really become a better place when it realizes that the creation of the "exclusive monotheistic god" Judaism came up with has led to all sorts of aberrations against nature. In rebelling against self-proclaimed ???divine??? Pharoes, Jews lifted their own tribe at least to the status of ???chosen people??? modelled after a ???real deity??? and laid out rules and regulations to organize life as best suited their culture and times. Christianity -- which essentially had a social rebel in Jesus infuse some Buddhism into Judaism to make it a little more tolerant of human "sin" (he who is without sin shall cast the first stone, etc...) ??? then saw Churches arising only to stifle more natural social and intellectual progress. Sole proof required is consideration of all the potential ideas and scientific proofs leading towards real truth(s) we either never learned or took centuries more to discover because the Catholic Church killed countless thinkers (women, etc...) it deemed non-conformist/blasphemous dangers. And Islam, the latest ???branch??? of Judaism...Do I really need to go there or should you just turn on the news? Ancient cultures valued thought and open discussion in their efforts to seek truth. Humanity???s decline really began with the notion/imposition of a fake exclusive monotheistic entity with hundreds and thousands of taboos against everything that comes naturally to people. (thinking/questioning included, as I was taught in Catechism during my childhood indoctrination into it that this too would lead me to hell...). We will only really rise again after that concept is killed. (versus tolerated by establishments like the UN and modern democracies.) All of you about to come down on me for this entry (assuming Newsweek keeps it) may want to consider the struggles Europe is facing in dealing with Islam today for a modern/concrete example of religious incompatibility with respect for core human decency/progress.

  • Posted By: NYboating @ 01/22/2009 11:03:18 AM

    You make a valid correction on the TG and TS difference. However, TV is a term used for anyone who weras clothing of the opposite sex, for whatever reason. Not all TVs do so for sexual gratification. Some merely prefer the clothing merely as personal expression or preference. For example, I am a heterosexual male but simply enjoy sitting around the house in skirts and dresses with no sexual element whatsoever; I am just more comfortable in that attire. Cross-dressing for sexual gratification can be called a fetish, and the broad generalization that it is the only reason for cross-dressing is a misconception that continues to stereotype the TV community.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now