To Treat the Dead

The new science of resuscitation is changing the way doctors think about heart attacks—and death itself.
 
Discuss
 
Member Comments
  • Posted By: ccape8 @ 10/05/2008 10:12:23 AM

    Comment: This is absolutely solid science. Reperfusion injury is what damages ischemic tissue - that's true for organs as well as for the body as a whole. Hypothermic theory is currently being applied to reduce damage immediately after spinal cord injuries. If you reduce the metabolic demands of the body at its most vulnerable times, minimize energy requirements as well as secondary injury, you may just be able to reestablish equilibrium and life.

  • Posted By: s3715 @ 10/03/2008 4:55:16 PM

    Comment: When you cut down a tree, it dies, even though it takes time for each individual cell to die. The integrity of the whole is irreversibly compromised. Why can't we see that the same is true for the human body? What are the myriad unknowns that will follow a person brought back from the dead in this manner?

  • Posted By: ojibwa @ 09/14/2008 1:12:05 PM

    Comment: Homo sapiens sapiens cannot accept death. This is another circus of denial

  • Posted By: Sheepster411 @ 01/19/2008 10:08:03 PM

    Comment: Gee, I hope my doctor reads Newsweek!

  • Posted By: mellowoutmon @ 12/24/2007 2:25:59 PM

    Comment: So this is what Miracle Max would call "mostly dead?"

  • Posted By: pglaskowsky @ 12/24/2007 12:56:25 AM

    Comment: One point where the writer cheats a little: using the term "clinical death" in a way that will lead most people to misunderstand it. To doctors, "clinical death" does not mean "dead," but merely "apparently dead." The writer's purpose in abusing this term was to imply that doctors don't really understand the difference between "clinical death" and the true irreversible end of life, thus dramatizing the story. But medical science figured out this difference decades ago.

    The research described here is new and amazing, but it's part of the steady progress of medical science... and it won't change the definition of "clinical death."

    . png

  • Posted By: rajivalgoo @ 12/13/2007 5:24:38 PM

    Comment: Really fascinating. Still, it makes so much sense. As a survivor of a major surgery I feel that this knowledge can contribute immensely to the approach to open heart operations.

    Paul

  • Posted By: bimp @ 12/12/2007 3:35:36 PM

    Comment: This is unbelievable! Now it's just a matter of weeks before the class-action lawsuits begin: "every death in a hospital for the past 100 years was caused by reperfusion, the plaintiffs claim."

  • Posted By: Cups @ 12/12/2007 1:22:49 PM

    Comment: Well, the body isn't dead if the cells are still alive- It's asleep. So what exactly is death? Beyond clinical definitions, what is death? Why do cells behave the same way in response to cancer as they do in response to reperfusion?

 
 
Reply
Cancel
 
 
Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

Cancel
 
The Peek
 
 
SPORTS

Luxury stadiums are on the rise. A top seat can cost $150,000. Beer costs extra.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
 
VIEWPOINT

The vast majority of Americans are dissatisfied with the direction of the country. So who are the 10 percent who think everything is A-OK?

Sponsored by
 
 
 
loadingLoading Menu