SPONSORED BY:

To Treat the Dead

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Solving the Palin Puzzle
Solving the Palin Puzzle

See how well you can see Sarah from your house, by taking our trivia quiz.

The Failure of Copenhagen
The Failure of Copenhagen

Why there could be a silver lining in a failed climate treaty.

Dial 'A' for Accessory
Dial 'A' for Accessory

This season's top i-Phone add-ons.

118 Days in Hell
118 Days in Hell

A NEWSWEEK journalist recounts his captivity in Iran.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: j-la0808 @ 02/21/2009 11:33:27 AM

    The age-old debate: should we use the technology just because we can. Quality of life issues are seldom addressed adequately. "Let's save everybody all the time" has led us to an ethical, moral and (dare I say it) financial crisis in medicine. Primum non nocere....first do no harm.

  • Posted By: cris_icu_rn @ 11/29/2008 2:42:17 AM

    This article only addresses reperfusion of the heart, but what about the brain? Brain cells do die quickly and the brain is the organ which makes the heart function, independent of life support.

  • Posted By: Oneeye @ 11/28/2008 10:08:39 AM

    Comment: What bothers me is how slow the medical field is in implementing new ideas such as this. Not only could it save people who have had heart attacks, but it could save thousands of children who drown every year in backyard pools. What parent would refuse to implement this life saving method of restoring life even after as long as an hour. If they can use a heart for a transplant hours later then the heart is not dead in five minutes

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now