Newsletters

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: StarSword @ 05/29/2009 11:05:40 AM

    I preface this post by saying that I'm not a psychiatrist, psychologist, neurologist, or anything other than a person with mental illness who has studied the brain for his own benefit. Any readers who are, feel free to comment.

    The swine flu scare is just another example of how the human limbic system makes people into idiots.

    The so-called reptile brain governs the human "fight or flight" response, and several other instincts that during the pretechnological era were essential to keep us from winding up inside a predator. Now, of course, we have guns, planes and cars, and don't need it, but evolution hasn't caught up with this yet.

    What this has to do with the swine flu is an example of risk analysis. Intelligent beings fear what is new, what is unexpected, what they know little about, etc. Heidi Lum's letter in the May 25 issue mentioned the AIDS problem. While its true that, whereas the swine flu virus, while affecting people not usually infected by seasonal flu, seems to be no deadlier than seasonal flu, HIV and AIDS continue to infect and kill millions, HIV, pardon me for saying this, is old news, and just doesn't scare people like it used to now that, even though we can't yet cure it, we can treat it and prevent new cases.

    Meanwhile, the last "pandemic", avian flu, managed to get at least one indy horror film based on it, "Flu Birds". This is ridiculous, but it goes to show you just how dominant the limbic system is in the human brain.

    Aaron J. Davis

  • Posted By: hipguy @ 04/25/2009 12:47:14 AM

    This is a serious question. I've been trying to find out exactly where in the Constitution torture of persons, who are not United States citizens, and who are suspected of serious crimes, is expressly prohibited. Can anyone tell me? Sometimes, I hear commentators say it's against the law. Sometimes, I hear, or read, that torture of persons who are not U.S. citizens, and are suspected of having committed a serious crime, is a violation of an oath. Sometimes, it's that torture of non citizens (again, and who are suspected of serious crimes) is simply against the customs and precedents of America. Well, which is it? If torture, under these circumstances, is in violation of The Constitution, could you tell me where to look in The Constitution?

    Please, I am not being sarcastic, or sly. I'd really like to know. I don't know who else to ask.

    H. Weiner
    harvey@mcom.com

    • Posted By: StarSword @ 05/29/2009 10:41:48 AM

      Well, Mr. Weiner, I'm not a professor-grade expert on the Constitution, but my best (and favorite) subject in high school was history. The Constitution in fact makes no mention of torture. If it is forbidden anywhere, it would fall under the jurisdiction of the Eighth Amendment, which states, and I quote, "Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted."

      This, is of course, intentionally vague, like much of the Constitution: the Founding Fathers wanted the Constituion vague so it could be applied to fit changing circumstances as history went on. Compare this to countries like France, which is now on its FIFTH entirely new constitution; we've only scrapped ours once, back in 1789 when the Articles of Confederation were replaced with the Constitution. The trouble is inherent in the vagueness: "cruel and unusual punishment" could mean virtually anything, but traditionally has not included jail time, fines, probation, and the like.

      And not many people understand this as far as I know, but this is not the first time that torture--ahem, "enhanced interrogation techniques"--have been used by the USA. During either the Mexican-American War or the Spanish-American War (I forget which), both sides resorted to torture on occasion. This, of course, was outlawed by the Geneva Conventions, which define the rules of war and rights of POWs. Naturally not every nation abided by them (*cough* Bataan *cough* Hitler *cough cough*), but they are nevertheless an essential part of international law. Do they forbid torture of POWs? Yes. Do captured terrorism suspects count as POWs? THAT is the real question.

      My opinion: just because the enemy doesn't follow the rules of war, doesn't mean we don't have to.

  • Posted By: SEFANI @ 04/30/2009 4:40:09 AM

    I am from ethiopia . I Live insouthomo zone. which have 16 languages & nations. I have write alot about these people.
    IF YOU HELP ME "MY DREAM IS *TO SEE THE WRITINGS ON YOUR MAGAZINE*" IF YOU ARE HAPPY CONTACT ME ON SOFANI2000@GMAIL.COM

  • Posted By: hipguy @ 04/25/2009 12:45:33 AM

    This is a serious question. I've been trying to find out exactly where in the Constitution torture of persons, who are not United States citizens, and who are suspected of serious crimes, is expressly prohibited. Could anyone tell me?Sometimes, I hear commentators say it's against the law. Sometimes, I hear, or read, that torture of persons who are not U.S. citizens, and are suspected of having committed a serious crime, is a violation of an oath. Sometimes, it's that torture of non citizens (again, and who are suspected of serious crimes) is simply against the customs and precedents of America. Well, which is it? If torture, under these circumstances, is in violation of The Constitution, could you tell me where to look in The Constitution?

    Please, I am not being sarcastic, or sly. I'd really like to know. I don't know who else to ask.

    H. Weiner

  • Posted By: aghadilbar3 @ 04/18/2009 9:05:11 AM

    Dear Barak Obama
    I Aghadilbar have sent President Barak Obama 100 registered research
    letters
    (100 new ideas to develop America)) through
    Embassy
    of USA
    ISLAMABAD till today dated 18.4.2009 (and also direct sent these registred
    letters via
    WHITEHOUSE
    WASHINGTON DC 20500).
    These letters have been written on the guidelines of CHANGE WE NEED. And
    these
    letters are
    about the Commonmen Problems of respected American Peoples and their
    Solutions.( To end, Economic Recession,Unemployment and to end War for
    Peace)
    Please Confirm
    Aghadilbar(founder)
    INTERNATIONAL REVOLUTION MOVEMENT
    64-neelum block ait LAHORE(PAKISTAN)
    Phone 0092427830084
    Cell 03334628349

  • Posted By: lawnkeeper @ 04/15/2009 1:32:36 PM

    Steve Tuttle is right on with his article "Don't Call it Country." I gave up on country music rdio several years ago when they actually became rock music stations. Yesterday while channel surfing I caught a group I believe are called "The Duhks." I don't think there is a musical category for whatever it is they thought they were doing. I have purchased and listened to Bluegrass for a few years now. At least there is some consistency there.

  • Posted By: wishbook @ 03/02/2009 2:06:36 PM

    President Obama needs to get different advisors in the White House, the ones he has don't have a clue and are not on the same page as the average person who lives in these United States. When Obama wakes up after he stops throwing all this money around, he needs to let all these companies go under and new companies will surface and create a better America. Do cross country high speed, latest tech, rail and put the people back to work. Give the new Companies a hand up! Linda in California

  • Posted By: happy2 @ 02/22/2009 7:17:41 AM

    Thank you Anna Quindlen for your arcticle 'On Their Own Terms'. Women have rights and should not be prosecuted for their tough decisions and reproductive choices.

  • Posted By: med064177650 @ 02/14/2009 9:57:29 AM

    It is too cleare that president Barak is going to save not only the American media industry but also the whole world from the economic crisis which damaged all the industries through out the planet.We have to be more optimistic ,because Obama has already prepared his plan for the change ,which I consider important in this peroide of pressure.At this stage we have to foster the work tha media has .Media is capable to bail out the financial crisis by many means,by seducing people to stust thier leader,bank and so on.

  • Posted By: Pennsanza @ 01/26/2009 12:07:13 PM

    I congratulate Newsweek on the inclusion of Adrian Campo Flores; without him, Latin American affairs would be totally invisible in your magazine. This is an urgent call to Newsweek...please, fly him to Guatemala in order for him to document horrific and non-stop Violence Against Women in Guatemala.

  • Posted By: Pennsanza @ 01/26/2009 12:04:46 PM

    I appreciate Newsweek inclusion of Adrian Campo Flores' enriching writings on Latin America and urge Newsweek to ship him to Guatemala in order to document Violence Against Women in Guatemala

  • Posted By: Augustus @ 01/23/2009 6:19:50 AM

    The euphoria of the new president???s swearing-in ceremony, which was genuinely shared by people right around the globe, was momentarily subdued when the president stated that the US was ready to lead again. What did he mean by ???ready to lead again???? Did he mean the US Government was ready to lead its people to a better way of life -which is a great idea- or did he mean the US is ready to play a leadership role among the nations of the world ?

    One could almost hear a universal groan and sense the question forming in a million minds all over the world. ???Why does the United States of America always want to lead free non American people who don???t want to be led by anyone but by their elected leaders ???? Why can???t the United States of America accept the validity of other people???s culture, customs, national aspirations and sovereignty without assuming that they are in need of change to something that will better serve an American agenda?

    Surely the evidence of world history, over the past 50 years, has convinced enough people that American leadership, when applied to other peoples??? countries, is frequently a recipe for disaster for the countries involved. Consider, if you will the effects of American leadership in Guatamala, Indonesia, Chile, Iran, Cuba, Brazil, the African Congo, Vietnam and Iraq to name only the most memorable failures. All too often in the past American leadership in other countries has amounted only to a dose of Milton Friedman economic medicine administered by the unsympathetic hand of the CIA, sometimes with the help of the US armed forces. All of this for no purpose other than to enhance the security of the American homeland or the American way of life and to increase the wealth of American multinational companies. It is hardly surprising then that many people, other than the leaders of bankrupt economies and corrupt dictators, wince at the mere mention of the Pandora???s Box of American leadership abroad.

    But we live in hope of better days; maybe the President did not mean ???Leadership Abroad??? and if he did maybe he has wholesome ideas about what that entails, than many of the presidents who went before him. In any event let us all sincerely pray God to bless America and to give wisdom and courage to a man who is surely the most inspiring new president to emerge from the people for many generations .
    Maurice O'Brien
    info@copycal.com

  • Posted By: anderson09 @ 01/14/2009 10:42:51 PM

    While in asia last summer I read several copies of your International issue. I was so impressed that I canceled my Time subscription and ordered your magazine. To my surprise you print two completely different magazines, the Time clone you send to the US and the World view you ship overseas. This is not so hard to understand, but why do you do you censer the citizens of the US from your best magazine? I am honestly shocked that I cannot get a subscription to your international issue in the US. Any realistic answers?
    Keith Anderson
    kkanderson@comcast.net

  • Posted By: danamcmahon @ 01/11/2009 11:54:28 PM

    Any suggestion for another Bush four years from now is for box car hobos only.
    Yours just another American.

  • Posted By: bobbiedog61 @ 01/06/2009 5:23:07 PM

    I am highly pissed off at your mag. for letting this Lisa Miller, saying that the Bible in a around about way supports The Gays. It Condems those so called people.

  • Posted By: bobbiedog61 @ 01/06/2009 5:17:47 PM

    If you have an Editor by the name of Lisa Miller, on ypor staff, she should be Tarred and Feathered forbringing the Bible in on her comment concerning the Gays. The Bible Condems the Gays as they should be. I will let the people around here know about how your Mag. takes up for the Gays.

  • Posted By: auer @ 01/06/2009 4:23:31 PM

    can you help, please.
    looking for old News Week Magazines from privious years. thank you

  • Posted By: auer @ 01/06/2009 4:21:51 PM

    no coment but, can you help me find old newsweek magazines from earlier years?

  • Posted By: Spreen @ 12/14/2008 10:53:42 AM

    Great article Gay Marriage and Biblical Case.
    Kathleen S. Christenson

  • Posted By: mark263 @ 10/08/2008 10:37:28 AM

    I think your feature photo of Governor Palin is repugnant and offensive and I can finally see that the Newsweek of old is no longer the same magazine that I used to know. Can you say "Fair And Balanced?" How would Senator Obama or Senator Clinton appear?

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse