I am not a subscriber, but have come across the issue of the magazine in my doctor's waiting room. This article makes me believe even stronger that global warming IS the convenient untruth, i.e. a hoax. The entire article talks about politics of global warming, rather than about the scientific facts, and its tone ridicules the opponents. This is an example of bad journalism, yet a few pages later you berate Fox for setting up an alternative.
The Global Warming Debate
Email To A Friend
Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.
It is one thing to claim that the average Earth temperature is rising. This is global warming. It is quite another to claim that the Earth temperature rise is caused by human behavior. This should be called anthropogenic global warming, and the two terms must not be used interchangeably. It is outrageous to insinuate that anyone who questions whether human behavior causes global warming has been paid to say so. Your article smacks of predatory journalism.
Michael and Christine Economides
Houston, Texas
Your article caricatures the argument about global warming as between good, intelligent scientists and evil, venal deniers in the employ of big corporations. There is another group out here, people who were trained as scientists and feel very able to understand the arguments, who think that there are real scientific problems with the current theory, and who think that scientific analysis should continue until there is a provable theory in place. While some may be ready to declare the argument settled, I’m not, and there are a lot of people like me.
Tom Jones
Dallas, Texas









Discuss