POLITICS

Mitt's Mission

Voters can't connect with a candidate they feel they don't know. Mitt Romney has to decide how much he wants to share.

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: GordonHatchUT @ 10/12/2009 1:52:46 AM

    Wasn't one of Romney's national guys a guy named Matthew Kennedy who was a Mormon. He was connected to the Kennedy family some way but publishes a mormon magazine - lds living. The Boston globe did a story on his company and his role in the Romney run. I think he is actually related to the Kennedys.

  • Posted By: eddiewhere @ 02/08/2008 3:41:29 AM

    MITT"S MISSION IS OVER I REST MY CASE>
    THE CASE OF THE CLOWN HAS BEEN SOLVED>
    BRONZE MEDAL
    ALREADY LOST ENOUGH MONEY
    QUITTER.

  • Posted By: Mighty Mouse @ 02/07/2008 8:50:53 PM

    Hey listen, why doesn't everybody in Americal wise up a little. Most American's hate Mormons and they are too afraid to vocalize it. A few of them speak out against these sub-human creatures, but in their heart of hearts they simply want them to go away.

    • Posted By: kumjani @ 02/08/2008 2:00:10 AM

      Sub-human creatures? I rest my case.

  • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 02/01/2008 12:23:48 AM

    Mormon doctrine that sounds Biblical

    Mormons say they believe in Jesus but the Jesus they serve is not the Biblical Jesus. The Jesus of the Mormon Church is the brother of Lucifer. Jesus is a spirit child of God the Father and a heavenly mother by physical union. (sex) Jesus was born a child and through obedience to the Laws became a God, therefore Jesus has not always been God. Jesus' shed blood on the cross does not atone for all sins, but there are certain sins that the blood of Jesus does not atone for. Jesus after He was crucified and raised to life married three women and had offspring.

    Mormons say they believe in God the Father but He is not the same One from the Bible. Mormons believe that God the Father was once a man who became a God. Mormons believe that God the Father had a father, and his father had a father, an endless progression of Gods. That means God has not always been God, but the Father was at one time not God by nature.

    Mormons say they believe in the Trinity but their definition is different. The Mormon Church teaches that the Father, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit (Trinity) are three different Gods. Mormons believe the Trinity is one in purpose not in nature.

    Mormons say they are the only true Church. The Mormon Church teaches that they are the only true Church and that all others are the Church of the devil. They may not say this to you but they do teach this.

    Mormons say they believe in the Bible. The Mormon Church teaches that there are 4 holy books. These books are: the Book of Mormon, the Pearl of Great Price, Doctrines and Covenants, and the Bible. The Bible in the Mormon Church is least looked upon for doctrine and theology. Mormons are taught that the Bible is correct as long as it goes with their theology. If the Bible contradicts what the other 3 books say or their theology, than the Bible is wrong according to the Mormon Church


    • Posted By: kumjani @ 02/08/2008 1:57:18 AM

      Wow, you really need to get your facts straight HolyRoller. I am impressed though at your spin.

  • Posted By: Rolandas Tucas @ 02/05/2008 2:21:07 PM

    What Romney did in Maine proves his strength. He won over 50% of the vote even though both senators endorsed McCain and attended the caucuses speaking for McCain. I have great expectations for the Presidential vote in Nov. Romney is the only candidate who overwhelms those expectations. He is the economic genius, is against illegal immigration. Romney is set to fix our economy and to save the principles upon which the republican party was founded.
    Rolandas Tucas

  • Posted By: Karenn1 @ 02/01/2008 8:23:23 AM

    Man wrote the Mormon scriptures, also the bible. People only read them,to find justification for there way of living. Even attacking a country for oil.

  • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 02/01/2008 6:53:40 AM

    What do you get when you mix a Mormon with national politics? A LOSER!!!

  • Posted By: eddiewhere @ 02/01/2008 5:54:00 AM

    MITTS MISSION IS OVER. HE was the REINCARNATION OF BUSH but with NO comPasiion. HE WOULD HAVE LEFT MILLIONS WITHOUT HEALTH CARE and his immigration Plan scared half the AMERICAN PoPulation. I HAD A TOUGH TIME FIGURING OUT WHO WAS THE BIGGEST CLOWN ROMNEY OR RUDY. HAND DOWN RUDY. HOWEVER ROMNEY COMES IN A CLOSE SECOND. THIS GUY FLIP FLOPPED ON EVERY MAJOR ISSUE. HE IS A NUT. HE NEVER LIVED IN THE REAL WORLD. HE has no idea what many AMERICANS GO THROUGH. HIS AGENDA WAS TO FEED THE BUSH BACKER's GREED.


    I noticed you criticized Benson for supporting the JOHN BIRCH SOCIETY. BUT you never criticized him. Benson doctrine is what the MAJORITY of Mormons live by. I would like to see you go to your church and criticize Benson. As mentioned I back my statements up with facts.
    There are many reasons Mormons will not come forth even though they know of the corruption in the Mormon church. One is due to their belief in Mormon scripture which they associate with the Mormon church. The leadership has usurped power and authority over this scripture. Thus, the members of the Mormon church think that God expects them to support their misguided leaders. This is much the - rationalization that many Americans make about our government. They all know of the corruption, but rationalize that it is unpatriotic to talk against the government or ungrateful to complain when they enjoy superficial prosperity."

    THE LINK BETWEEN BUSH FAMILY AND ROMNEY IS HENRY TAFT BENSON. CO FOUNDER OF THE RUSSEL TRUST aka. SKULLS N BONES SOCIETY.

  • Posted By: Kellyloggs @ 10/17/2007 1:59:38 AM

    I find it very disturbing that Mitt Romney is so reluctant to discuss his religious beliefs, especially since his Mormon faith has obviously instrumental in what he has become today. But one cannot say that his background and devout Mormon beliefs of hard work, frugality, and discipline will make him an excellent President without delving to some of the more unsettling aspects of this deeply guarded and secluded group of people. There are two things about Mormonism that I find very troublesome, and feel that Mr. Romney must address them and his feelings about them before we could honestly elect him to rule the free world. The first of which is the practice of "baptisms of the dead," in which Mormons would sometimes baptize deceased people from other religions, specifically Jews lost in the Holocaust, so that they may go to Heaven and be with God. Not only is this disrespectful and pious, but also shows complete disregard to the religious freedom of non-Mormons. (Mr. Romney did admit to have performed these ceremonies) The second bullet that Mr. Romney has been able to dodge, at least to my knowledge, is the long and well-documented history of blatant racism practiced and preached by Mormons. Until 1978, well after the civil rights movement, Mormons considered Blacks to be the descendants of Cain and therefore "cursed" with our black skin, wide-flat noses, and inferior intellect. Until 1978, black Mormons were not allowed to hold any positions in the church as well. So if Mitt Romney was born in 1947, that means for at least the first 31 years of his life, he was deeply embedded in a religion which taught him that blacks were ignorant, lesser beings, that were being punished and marked for life because we were to suffer for the sins of our supposed ancestor Cain. Until he can openly and candidly discuss his views of minorities and whether or not he still believes in the ???gospel??? that was imbedded in his mind for more than half of his life, I cannot consider him a sincere person nor a viable candidate. I am surprised and appalled that more media attention has not been given to these issues. Regardless, Mr. Romney will not get my vote. Not unless he is able to convince minorities that pulling the lever with his name on it will not result in a bigot sitting in the oval office. We???ve come too far to take a step back.

    • Posted By: jvogey @ 01/31/2008 12:57:02 PM

      Your comment illustrates that racial tolerance is very important to you. Unfortunately, it also reveals that you are prejudiced against the Mormon Church. You withhold the very tolerance that you call for. You listed no concerns with Mitt Romney other than those that are based on his religion. Isn???t this also a form of prejudice? The first colonists came to the New World seeking religious freedom and tolerance. Mam, I am sorry to say that you have already taken a step backwards and that your religious prejudice borders itself on bigotry.

    • Posted By: imho @ 10/18/2007 11:49:07 PM

      Kelly,
      I would begin, if I were Mitt, by telling you that we baptize by proxy for the dead, the names of relatives, so that they may have the opportunity beyond the veil of death to accept OR reject the gospel of Jesus Christ. We do not force our religion on anyone. Especially since baptism is an ordinance that has to happen here, and i also would point you to THE BIBLE for its neccessity : 1 Corinthians 15:29 (King James Version)
      29 Else what shall they do which are baptized for the dead, if the dead rise not at all? why are they then baptized for the dead?
      Hence, also, the LDS churches interest in Geneology.
      As for blacks receiving the priesthood??? You are incorrect to state that blacks could hold no positions in the church. They just couldn???t hold positions that required a priesthood they didn???t have. As soon as they were able to receive the priesthood, all callings were open to them, because they held the prerequisite priesthood. It had NOTHING to do with racism, contrary to what makes more newsworthy opinions.
      As for answering for the church not giving priesthood authority to blacks until 1978, I suggest you write the church. I know they will give you an appropriate answer. But I am sure the answer came in the Lord???s time, not yours or mine. So I am sorry, but the civil rights movement of the 60???s had nothing to do with nor any influence on the timing. All directions that the prophet leads the church are prayed about and answered by our heavenly father. The timing is his, as is the church.
      As for my own opinion, I don???t think Mitt should have to answer for church policies, as he doesn???t have the authority to shape those policies. It is like asking a desk clerk to defend a veto the governor handed down. By your reasoning, he should have to answer for it because he is a member of his organization? Kind of silly when you think about it.

  • Posted By: Vortigin @ 01/28/2008 6:32:32 PM

    "Voters can't connect with a candidate they feel they don't know. Mitt Romney has to decide how much he wants to share." Who cannot connect with a man who feels that some parts of his life should remain personal? Why should Romney be held responsible for explaining the tenets of his faith? The truth is out there for anyone who cares to learn it via other means. Romney knows the people asking are more interested in twisting his words, than in learning the truth. (Sound familiar?) His persuasion toward brevity is intelligent and called for.
    As for his flip-flop nature, anyone who has ever tried to temper one's belief in tolerance (the ideal that others should be free to choose), with one's own belief in an absolute right or wrong should feel a kinship with Romney. As a potential representative of the American mass, he seems to be attempting to take a more neutral/moderate political stance (difficult and maybe impossible for any intelligent human being) while trying to hold to his personal ethics. I say good for him for trying to find a balance. If he flip-flops along the way, then he is only working toward a balance. I relate to him just fine.

  • Posted By: Rolandas Tucas @ 01/19/2008 2:05:19 PM

    Mr. Romney is the best! Lt with You.
    Rolandas Tucas

  • Posted By: Rockwell @ 12/16/2007 2:34:35 PM

    Comment: As a Southern Baptist, I was taught doctrine that contrasts the differences between Southern Baptist theology and other Christian faiths. I have also learned that tolerance that is not forced and that comes from prayer and the heart is the most desirable. Mitt Romney articulated a vision of tolerance that allows me to embrace how others define their faith and, at the same time, enthusiastically espouse my traditional values and beliefs. His message was uniting, inspirational and visionary. I am strongly leaning toward supporting Mitt. Unfortunately, "Johnny 1967" must have been listening to someone else speeking. Mitt was right on as he blended his life view and Americam experience in an artful manner. He was, in fact, not pouring salt on anyone, but rather, creating a template for reconcillation and a strong common ground for significant progress in a pluralistic society. Sorry "Johnny 1967", you unfortunately missed the depth and sincerity of Mitts message.

  • Posted By: kitkat @ 11/18/2007 12:18:16 AM

    Members of the LDS church do believe that Jesus is their Savior. They also believe that the Book of Morman is another testament to Jesus Christ, not a superior book to the Bible. I have had the opportunity to live amongst these people and to attend their church meetings. They treat people with warmth and kindness,have high moral and family values, and they are the first to serve others in need. Our country seems to be in turmoil these days, perhaps we need someone with these values in office. I don't believe it is fair to form an opinion of a person only on their religious beliefs. We should be looking at what candidate can has the knowledge, experience, and drive to do what is right for our country. We are in trouble and need to fix things quickly or our country is no longer going to be the power it has been. We should be keeping jobs here in our own country so that our engineers and scientists etc. are not unemployed. We are giving our businesses and land and power to other countries. We don't have time to argue about religious beliefs of any candidate.

  • Posted By: sarija @ 10/24/2007 1:42:29 PM

    as a German I grew up knowing these two big churches - the catholic church and the evangelical/protestant church. and I think that's what most people grew up with (now there are a lot more churches/religious organizations in the public view etc.) so anything outside of that probably seems 'weird', 'scary', like a 'cult'. it's the very common fear of the unknown, I guess.
    what does romney's religion have to do with his presidential run? everything, no. something, maybe. a little, yes, that for sure. I don't believe that he has to answer every reporter's question about church history, rumors, 'secret rituals' and so forth. he should answer certain question that have to do with his personal beliefs influencing his political career. we already know that he is a mormon and therefore believes in the church doctrines which teaches the gospel of Jesus Christ. everything that he didn't have a decision or effect on (e.g. poligamy, priesthood for all members), he can't be held accountable for. yes, as a member you believe the church is lead by Jesus Christ through his living prophet, therfore everything that has happened or will happen was and is God's will. respect for certain sacred ways and believes of one's church should be granted to any member of any religion.
    but I think that he should take a stand for his personal believes when it comes to gay-marriage, abortion and other main political issues that are addressed in the campaign. especially explain his flip-flopper atitude in a few areas. nobody doubts that he's a great business man, but as a president of such a great counrty, founded by inspired people ('in God we trust'), he has to let Americans know what he truly personally believes in when it comes to major issues regarding the whole nation. which is, by no means, again, the whole history of the church.

    religion plays a role in a big political campaign...and I would research religions as well, and I will admit that I wouldn't be sure about a lot of religions probably, but the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is the only one, in my opinion, truly giving anyone a choice about its truth...ask Heavenly Father yourself and He will let you know.
    maybe romney doesn't answer detailed questions about church doctrine, because he doesn't want to be misunderstood, quoted out of context and might be even sometimes not exactly sure what to answer. I don't know everything, every little detail of so many things. I'm still learning, and so when people ask me some questions, I have my thoughts about but am not too sure yet about the doctrine of the church, I refer them to our regional leaders (bishop, stake president etc.) and of course to the official LDS website. I only try to talk about things on a public scale, like this 'forum', when I am 100% sure about my knowledge about something. and even though I don't have all the answers yet, I know the LDS church is true.

  • Posted By: Rocketman @ 10/22/2007 7:25:02 PM

    It wouldn't be true or fair to claim that Mitt's religious beliefs have no bearing on how he would act as president. However, it would also not be true or fair to claim that his religious beliefs make him unfit to be president. If you want to know how Mitt Romney's beliefs will affect his choices, look at the choices he's already made. Religion affects the values we hold, the choices we make, and the company we choose to keep, but it doesn't cause a person to transform into a religious dictator just because he gains public office. What Mormonism is going to make out of Mitt Romney has already been made, it has already played its part. It will continue to guide him just as it has already been guiding him and will cause him to continue to make the choices he is already making. What voters need to decide is not wether or not they like the source of that guidance or those choices, but wether that direction and those choices are right for America.

  • Posted By: Lily-Lou @ 10/19/2007 6:28:52 PM

    I'm supporting Mitt Romney for President, not preacher. What is all this nonesense about him being a Mormon?? I'm Russian Orthodox, and I believe he's the best man to succeed to the presidency. I could give a darn about his personal, PRIVATE religious beliefs. I want a president who will protect us from terrorists; I already have my priests to guide me spiritually.

  • Posted By: Nova06 @ 10/15/2007 5:15:16 PM

    It's unfortunate that Newsweek didn't dive deeper into the beliefs of Mormonism that Mr Romney holds. Indeed, they believe, contrary to the Bible, that they will live together as a family in heaven. Did you bother to mention that the heaven they strive for is a planet of their own and that they believe they will each become a god of that planet? Besides special underwear to "keep out eveil spirits", there are many other facts that can be gleaned from the LDS doctrine that clearly identifies it as non-christian or extra-biblical. Have you even bothered to research by viewing "DNA vs. the book of Mormon" or "Jesus Christ vs Joseph Smith"? It will give your editors ??? and your readers/voters more information as to the mindset of a candidate that wishes to run the country.

    • Posted By: imho @ 10/18/2007 11:27:48 PM

      You truly have no idea of that which you speak. Not one of the church's members strive to have a planet of their own. We only strive to live with our heavenly father again after this life and "BE LIKE HIM". If that means that we may eventually be like him in all ways, ie. inherit his omnipotence and be able to create worlds, great. But to say that that is what we strive for is only inflamatory and incorrect. And I notice you post books by non-mormons on mormons. I wonder what half truths Satan would have to say about Jesus too?

  • Posted By: bfalke @ 10/17/2007 3:21:34 PM

    Apparently it's okay for the Senate Majority Leader to wear these "Secret Underwear" but not okay for the President? Hey...Harry's a Mormon too! Get over yourselves... a person's choice for their underwear is as stated...a person's choice. How Sophomoric! Let Mitt get to the issues.

  • Posted By: madmumbler @ 10/15/2007 9:36:20 AM

    I was very skeptical about Newsweek's comments about the "undergarments" and other aspects of Mormonism until I started researching in it. I'm sorry, but I refuse to vote for someone who thinks he has to wear "special underwear" to be loved by God. I used to think that Mormonism was a legitimate religion until I started learning about their secret rituals and "special underwear." That, to me, smacks of a cult. And any person who subscribes to this kind of nonsense doesn't have any business being the leader of a country!

    • Posted By: bfalke @ 10/17/2007 3:15:49 PM

      you truly are a mad mumbler. You are ignorant as to the history of the church in both the old and new testaments. Temple worship (and it's attached symbolism) has and will always be part of the Chirst's Church.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse