SPONSORED BY:

They Shoot Horses, Don’t They?

Wild mustangs carried pioneers, cowboys and soldiers. Today, they're being sold for slaughter. An American dilemma.

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

Chain saws don't usually take center stage in the rarefied world of equestrian showmanship. But that didn't stop Robin Secrist, 49, from revving his Stihl 026, whirling it with one hand above his head and thrusting it aloft, championship-belt style, as he rode his nonplussed gelding. Secrist's chain saw, promoted from its normal duty "limbing trees" in Alma, Wis., was just one of a menacing array of devices, including a cracking bullwhip and a balloon-shooting revolver, used to showcase the horses' fearlessness and trainability during Extreme Mustang Makeover. The new annual competition held in Ft. Worth, Texas, gives 100 trainers 100 days to break in 100 wild horses, plucked from free-roaming herds in the American West. Over the course of the two-day event, the once feral animals also showed off their softer sides with human-taught manners (no biting, no kicking, no galloping) and celebrity hairdos before being auctioned to the highest bidder. The winner, an Australian wrangler, took home $10,000. Secrist came in 11th. "I think they wanted a more finished horse," he says. "Or maybe they weren't ready for the chain saw."

More than a slice of Americana, the competition is part of a more serious problem: keeping Western range lands from being overgrazed by a horse population that, if left unchecked, doubles every four years, encroaching on ranch lands and overtaxing their natural habitat. By showing off these animals, the government (the Bureau of Land Management organized the event) hopes to increase public interest in owning them. If the Feds fail, they have to thin the herds in more-controversial ways, including captivity in federal corrals and sale "without limitation"—which can mean slaughter, though the BLM tries to screen out "killer buyers" by, among other things, forcing them to sign a pledge of safekeeping.

On the surface, the government seems to have succeeded. The 1,000-seat venue overflowed, the horses impressed and the auctions were lively: top-money mustang Hail Yeah secured a $50,000 bid and his own future as the mascot of Norco (Horsetown, U.S.A.), Calif., while the other horses sold for an average of more than $3,000 each (they typically sell for $125). But like its human equivalents, the Mustang Makeover was about more than a spot of cosmetic retooling and a backslapping good time for people who still wear chaps to work. It was part of a dramatic attempt to manage and solve an intractable long-term problem: how to find a place for the mustang, a symbol of freedom and the frontier way of life, in a world of diminished grazing land, competing land interests and changing cultural sensibilities.

Mustangs trace their roots to the mounts of the Spanish conquistadors who brought them to the New World, where they multiplied rapidly, numbering 2 million by 1900. Over the next century, as Americans moved toward cities, the horses were glorified in the nation's memory. Mustangs supported cowboys in 1950s Marlboro-man cigarette campaigns, lent their name to Ford's muscular coupe in the 1960s and appeared in countless Westerns, not least "Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid" in 1969.

But the romantic ideal belied a more brutal truth: entrepreneurs were harvesting mustangs and selling their meat for human consumption at home and abroad. Horse meat was considered mainstream enough for a 1951 Time magazine article to offer tips for cooking pot roast of horse and equine fillets. The killing stopped in 1971 after a federal act recognized mustangs as "living symbols of the historic and pioneer spirit of the West," banned their inhumane treatment and restricted their sale into slaughter. But the problem merely changed shape. The BLM wasn't interested in boosting the mustang population but rather cutting it further. Today, the official count of wild mustangs stands at 28,000—a seemingly manageable size that balances the land-use interests of weekenders, private homeowners, cattle ranchers and horse lovers. But an additional 30,000 horses, rounded up but unsold, are in federal corrals at a cost of $20 million to $50 million a year. With contraceptive shots too complicated and sale for slaughter legal (a 2004 bill gutted protections) but "unacceptable to the public," according to Don Glenn, head of the BLM's horse program, the agency's best hope is to find the animals adopted homes, a policy that's had lackluster success since its inception in 1979. Adoption numbers have been nearly halved over the past decade, falling to just 5,000 animals in 2006 due to a glut of available horses from breeders and a changing of the cultural guard that's depressing the whole industry. "It's a generational thing," says Patti Colbert, 56, executive director of the Mustang Heritage Foundation, which organized the Makeover with the BLM. "Younger folks want Harleys and Nintendo Wii instead of five acres and a horse." Overall, there are more than 100,000 unwanted horses each year, including mustangs, according to the Unwanted Horse Coalition, a Washington-based nonprofit.

This has led to a search for new solutions—or rather a return to old ones: slaughter. Organizations such as the American Association of Equine Practitioners and the American Association of Veterinary Medicine have come out in favor of selling unwanted horses into slaughter on the ground that it's the humane choice for animals that would otherwise be neglected or abandoned. "It's not like 'The Jungle Book' or the Disney Channel, when released animals frolic into the wild and find new families," says Tom Lenz, chair of the AAEP welfare committee. His organization and many other industry groups are aligned against a proposed federal ban on butchering horses for export—a lucrative business that until a year ago accounted for 26 million pounds of horse meat annually and $40 million in sales, enough to make America the world's fifth largest exporter of edible equine. Opponents of the bill say that it wouldn't end slaughter so much as push the unpalatable business into less regulated Mexican abattoirs, where workers stab the horses' spines until the animals are paralyzed and ready for slaughter. Since 2006, when Texas law shuttered two of the country's three remaining horse-meat factories, the number of U.S. horses being shipped south of the border has nearly tripled from 12,000 to about 30,000 to date in 2007, according to the USDA. That number seems set to rise given that the remaining plant, in Illinois, closed in September.

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Visions of a Decade
Visions of a Decade

From 2000-2009, one photo per month.

The Failure of Copenhagen
The Failure of Copenhagen

Why there could be a silver lining in a failed climate treaty.

Sex Scandals of the 2000s
Sex Scandals of the 2000s

From John Edwards to Mark Sanford, the decade's memorable affairs.

118 Days in Hell
118 Days in Hell

A NEWSWEEK journalist recounts his captivity in Iran.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: millempm201 @ 09/16/2008 8:31:35 PM

    Stop the breeding








    Stop the breeding!!!!!!!!!!!These fat cat horse breeders all the way down to the single owner. There are too many horses. Make breeders restricted, authorized, licensed and regulated. Horse are very expensive and need a lot of time and care. It's not the wild west anymore. There are proven, more human training methods. Horses are not disposable, their one of mans trusted companions for thousands of years. Make the breeders financially responsible for horses they produce. Each horse should be regestered and kept track of new owners. People should be required to pass a test, just like a drivers license to even buy a horse. There's alot more to it. No one should be allowed to breed any domestic animals unless authorized with strict rules and regulations. There is an over abundance of all domestic animals. No one should be allowed to own exotic or wild life animals without special training and license. Their are just too many animal being abused. Dog fighting, *** fighting, horse racing. Anyone using or abusing animals should be charged with a cheminal offence. Stop the senseless pain and suffering that is happening today. Just watch ASPCA animal precint a few times and your heart aches. There have been over 5000 deaths a year just on the race track, not to mention during training. Stop the suffering. Legislators - it up to you!!!!!!!!!!! These horses that are being shipped to slaughter are not the old and dying, they came in 5th or 6th a few times. The wild horses that are slaughtered are perfectly healthy. There's just too many. They cost a lot of money to take care of. Stop the breeding!!!!!!!

  • Posted By: denowlin @ 07/02/2008 7:19:57 PM

    What is absolutely ridiculous about this article is the fact that our government passed a law which halted horse slaughter in the U.S. based on emotion and to simply to appease extremists and animal rights activists. Processing horses for slaughter was a viable business in our country that provided jobs to hundreds of employees and served a purpose to salvage un-usable animals into a product that feeds people (primarily in other countries). When we have starving people in our nation and in our world, why on earth would we waste food just to appease people who can???t stomach the idea of the food chain? Why also would be shut down a legitimate business in our country that provided employment to our people just to make certain extremists feel all warm and fuzzy inside? What is our government going to try to regulate next, cattle, pig, goat, sheep or chicken slaughter just to appease animal rights activists. I love horses, I raise horses and I have owned and ridden horses all my life. No I would not chose to eat horse, unless I was starving, but I don???t have an issue with being able to humanely salvage an animal that may not be suited for any other use in this world. Most all of the horses that are sent to slaughter are sent for one of the following reasons: 1 ??? their owners can no longer take care of them, 2 ??? they are crippled or injured and can no longer be used to job that they were intended for, 3 ??? they unbreakable, have injured their owned and should not be sold to another individual who may also get harmed. Bottom line is that the horses that were being sent to slaughter were unwanted horses. Why do you think there are so many wild horses on public lands right now? There is not a demand by people to want to adopt these horses because they aren???t high quality horses, may people do not know how to handle these unbroken horses, and most of the general population cannot care of a horse, nor do they have the funds to do so in the current economic environment (when hay costs $50 per horse per week, not to mention boarding, vet care, farrier, etc., etc.). So if are faced with choices of either letting the mustang heard continue to populate and overrun our public lands and thus starve out themselves and other wild animals (deer, elk, mountain goats, mountain sheep, etc.) or to periodically thin the herd by humanely processing these animals for slaughter so that other living individuals may benefit, what is the more rational, educated, and humane decision?

  • Posted By: HOKAHAYHOHAY @ 07/02/2008 2:22:36 PM

    It seems our government's answer to everything is to kill it. They did it with the Canandian geese by gassing thousands because of people compalaining of the goose poop at the parks, they did it with the white mountain goats that became to over populated for their taste on an island that they put them on in the first place to eat the weeds up and now they want to do it with the wild horses. Nature works just fine without our meddling and playing God.
    They should turn loose the ones held capture like a prison to respectable places where they can thrive on their own. The answer is not killing then but then again we do have an idiot at the helm. Look how missmanaged Yellowston National Park is. Too much is put into the cattle culture who are not native to this country/ The destruction of what they have done in regards to pollution is deplorable. Read the Rise and FAll of the Cattle Culture. It will open your eyes to many things this country has done to drive it into the ground. We only have one small Earth, some just will never understand what that means.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now