Gonzales Hires a Top Gun
The former official—who did not believe such action was warranted—said that Gonzales's camp is increasingly worried that Fine might feel compelled to make such a move to avoid any suggestion that he was protecting his former boss and to reassert his independence. That would subject Gonzales to the unusual situation of being subject to a formal criminal investigation by the very department he used to head. "That is certainly one possible outcome of this," said the former official.
Terwilliger, who recently began discussions with Fine's investigators, confirmed to NEWSWEEK that he is representing Gonzales. But in an e-mail exchange, he declined to discuss any of the particular allegations against his client.
"We have been engaged to assist Judge Gonzales in his continued effort to provide assistance to the Department of Justice as it examines the Department's role in various programs and operations to combat the terrorist threat," Terwilliger wrote. "An unbiased assessment of the facts will show that Judge Gonzales, while holding high public office during a time of great peril, worked to help maintain the safety and security of the American people and acted always with the intent and commitment to honor the rule of law."
The stakes for Gonzales were ratcheted up last week when Jack Goldsmith, the former assistant attorney general in charge of the Office of Legal Counsel, testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee about the dispute. Goldsmith, a key player who was present when Gonzales and Andy Card, White House chief of staff at the time, showed up at Ashcroft's bedside. Goldsmith made clear that he, like others in the room, believed that the hospital meeting was indeed about the Terrorist Surveillance Program (TSP).
Asked by Democratic Sen. Charles Schumer what he made of the statement by Gonzales "that there was no serious internal dissent about the TSP," Goldsmith replied: "I would just say there were … enormous disagreements about many aspects related to the TSP." Goldsmith added, however, that "there is a technical interpretation of what he [Gonzales] said that is true … but it's very difficult to talk about it" in an unclassified setting.
Goldsmith's testimony echoed that of former deputy attorney general Comey and FBI Director Mueller. Like Goldsmith, Mueller has testified that he considered the hospital dispute to be about the Terrorist Surveillance Program—and his own contemporaneous notes indicated as much. But Gonzales's defenders have repeatedly said he was being extremely careful in his testimony because the underlying issues involved in the dispute—the particulars of the program that Goldsmith and others at Justice thought were in violation of the law—remain so highly classified that it was impossible for him to speak candidly. They and others have also suggested that, in part because of the Justice rebellion, aspects of the program were modified before its existence was publicly acknowledged by the White House. Therefore, they say, Gonzales was telling the truth when he said that there were no disagreements about the TSP "that the president has confirmed."


Loading Menu
Member Comments
Posted By: mohsingondal @ 10/17/2007 8:00:50 AM
Comment: http://www.indymedia.org/en/2007/10/893910.shtml
Posted By: mohsingondal @ 10/16/2007 6:24:39 PM
Comment: http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/story.html?id=8bb9cb53-9fad-49ba-941d-0c9dff7d477e
http://www.indymedia.org/en/2007/10/893910.shtml
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2007/09/365622.shtml
http://quebec.indymedia.org/en/node/27967
http://indymedia.us/en/2007/08/27010.shtml
http://indymedia.us/en/2007/08/27011.shtml
http://www.charchaa.com/blogtag/khalid_awan
http://www.nysun.com/article/37251