The Search for Common Ground
Can evangelicals and liberals come together over abortion, gay rights, and the role of religion in public life?
A group of evangelical and progressive leaders, led by the left-leaning think tank Third Way, are meeting this week in Washington to launch "Come Let Us Reason Together: A Fresh Look at Shared Cultural Values Between Progressives and Evangelicals," a new paper that calls for common ground on the toughest cultural issues of our day: abortion, gay and lesbian rights, treatment of the human embryo and the role of religion in the public square. The paper finds that among evangelicals in the U.S., one-fifth can be described as progressive and one-third as moderate, results similar to those of a 2006 survey by the PEW foundation that reported that while 46 percent of evangelicals are highly socially conservative, 36 percent are moderate and 18 percent are significantly less conservative on social issues. The full Third Way report can be found at www.third-way.com.
Third Way, a nonprofit group founded in 2005, does not have a high profile with the public, but it targets policy-makers—and in that arena it is beginning to make some waves. And there's reason to believe the group may be on to something. In a national survey conducted earlier this month, Third Way found that three-quarters of those surveyed said they wish elected leaders would look for a middle ground on abortion.
The authors of the 40-page report—a cross-section of evangelical leaders and Third Way staffers and consultants—acknowledge the difficulties involved in bridging the considerable political and cultural divide on such thorny issues. (Indeed, a leader of the National Right to Life Committee has called the Third Way approach "a political ploy to silence the debate.") But consensus is possible, the authors argue—through better communication and a greater willingness to focus on common goals. Those goals include reducing the need for abortions through better access to birth control, and also by providing more financial support for would-be mothers who might otherwise abort due to financial concerns. One of the evangelical leaders who has endorsed the idea of working together is the Rev. Joel C. Hunter, pastor of the Orlando-based Northland Church, who also serves on the board of directors of the National Association of Evangelicals. The former president of the Christian Coalition, who now preaches to a congregation of 12,000, talked with NEWSWEEK's Eve Conant on the prospects of bridging the cultural divide as the 2008 election looms. Excerpts:
NEWSWEEK: You are endorsing a paper that talks about bridging a gap between evangelicals and progressives. Does that mean that you are a progressive evangelical yourself?
Rev. Joel C. Hunter: It depends on the issue. I'm pro-life, I'm against the redefinition of marriage, and I'm against pornography and gambling. On issues related to compassion I'm more progressive—such as doing all we can for the environment, fighting poverty and the AIDS epidemic.
Do you typically vote for pro-life, Republican candidates?
Yes.
Why are you endorsing the efforts of progressive groups, like Third Way, which are pro-choice, if you are a conservative on the pro-life question?
Because there is emerging, out of the evangelical movement, a desire to make progress, even if we don't get it 100 percent our way. I think you are seeing that there is now more of an openness to work toward real, practical solutions that will at least reduce the number of abortions in the country. Bills like [the Reducing the Need for Abortions and Supporting Parents Act, introduced by a pro-life congressman and pro-choice congresswoman, with input from Third Way] support women who decide to carry their baby to term. For a pro-life person like myself that means one more baby gets to live. For the pro-choice movement that means one more woman gets supported in her decision. We're both reaching our goals without compromising our ideals. What the Third Way does, and what attracts me as an evangelical, is that they are the kind of think tank that can do the research and work on legislative goals to offer solutions evangelicals can get on board with. In recent years all you've been hearing from both sides is "This is where we stand." And so nothing gets done.
- 1
- 2
- Next Page »


Loading Menu
Member Comments
Posted By: uklviv1 @ 11/21/2007 11:12:04 AM
Comment: The idea of finding a common ground for discussing crucial issues is a very good one.
Posted By: uklviv @ 11/21/2007 12:08:59 AM
Comment: People want separation of church and state and that is a very good thing. They want to be free from the government's influence in their churches, yet they complain when the government makes decisions that are contrary to their moral or religious belief system. In some cases they take no action to go against the evil propositions and bills that are being passed in the senate and the courts of each state. As to the issue of evangeevaevange ssteatestaesstatesfsja;dsssssssssssssssssssssssss
Posted By: hillaryisahorse @ 11/19/2007 3:31:55 PM
Comment: william belive it or not the bible is not responsable for those acts people are.