Jon Meacham
The Editor’s Desk
We have two pieces of news close to home: a redesign of the magazine and of NEWSWEEK.com. Our renovations come at an interesting time for journalism. As the number of news outlets expands, it is said, attention spans shrink; only the fast and the pithy will survive. Some people in our business believe print should emulate the Internet, filling pages with short, Weblike bites of information.
We disagree. There is a simple idea behind the changes in the issue of NEWSWEEK you are holding: we are betting that you want to read more, not less. Other media outlets believe you just want things quick and easy. We think you will make the time to read pieces that repay the effort.
Led by Amid Capeci (the legendary Roger Black consulted with us, and Dan Revitte and Bonnie Scranton were instrumental), the redesign is more about refinement than revolution; many changes are subtle. The most important shift is a cleaner visual presentation that gives our writers more words and creates a better showcase for photography. We have also added pages to Periscope, expanded the Conventional Wisdom Watch and given voices like Jonathan Alter, Sharon Begley, Ellis Cose, Howard Fineman, Daniel Gross, Steven Levy, Lisa Miller, Anna Quindlen, Robert Samuelson, George Will and Fareed Zakaria a bit more space in which to make their points.
You will notice other things, too. At the end of Tip Sheet we now have a weekly column alternating among Kathleen Deveny on "Modern Family," Julia Reed on "Food & Drink," N'Gai Croal on geek culture, and Jane Bryant Quinn on personal finance.
For editors talking about redesigns or changings of the guard, it is very tempting to make grand declarations, but I am going to try to resist. Hyperbole does not get us very far, and you would hardly expect someone in my job to say anything other than greatness is either at, or already in, hand. What matters is what you think of the magazine week in and week out. We do not do focus groups or market research; we simply report, write and edit using our best judgment and our sense of what will challenge, engage and (pleasantly) surprise you. How do we arrive at this "sense"? This way: guided by our constant, organic conversation with readers through e-mails, letters and online comments, we publish the magazine we would want to get every week on the ground that if we find something interesting, you probably will, too.
For much of our history—we turn 75 in January, and Newsweek.com celebrates its 10th anniversary next year—we were consumed, naturally, with the content of the pages of the magazine. For the last decade and for the foreseeable decades to come, however, we have not one but two jobs: to produce a print magazine you are eager to read, and a Web site with daily original content that you find compelling. What links them is our commitment to bringing you reporting, voices and analyses you cannot get elsewhere.
- 1
- 2
- Next Page »


Loading Menu
Member Comments
Posted By: NHNative @ 11/06/2007 9:42:55 AM
Comment: Your print redesign is terrible. Seriously. The font is hard to read, the articles seem jumbled and bunched together on some pages. Despite being a longtime subscriber, my wife and I dislike it so much that we have decided to switch to another newsmagazine. Your editor stated in his opening piece that no focus groups were used for the redesign, which we believe was a huge mistake as you would have found (we suspect) many other readers who feel the way we do and will not re-subscribe and instead try Time, US News, etc.
In addition, the Belief Watch section never should have been added as a weekly piece (maybe monthly if anything) and the Interview section at the end of the magazine (Nikki?) is beyond shameful for a magazine like Newsweek. Go back and read the past year and you'll see how ridiculous the questions are. Even the people being interviewed have replied and inquired 'What kind of interview is this!?" If I wanted an article like this then I'd subscribe to People or one of those magazines. Many quality people are interviewed so why not make it count! Sorry to see you change.
Posted By: NHNative @ 11/06/2007 9:41:12 AM
Comment: Your print redesign is terrible. Seriously. The font is hard to read, the articles seem jumbled and bunched together on some pages. Despite being a longtime subscriber, my wife and I dislike it so much that we have decided to switch to another newsmagazine. Your editor stated in his opening piece that no focus groups were used for the redesign, which we believe was a huge mistake as you would have found (we suspect) many other readers who feel the way we do and will not re-subscribe and instead try Time, US News, etc.
In addition, the Belief Watch section never should have been added as a weekly piece (maybe monthly if anything) and the Interview section at the end of the magazine (Nikki?) is beyond shameful for a magazine like Newsweek. Go back and read the past year and you'll see how ridiculous the questions are. Even the people being interviewed have replied and inquired 'What kind of interview is this!?" If I wanted an article like this then I'd subscribe to People or one of those magazines. Many quality people are interviewed so why not make it count! Sorry to see you change.
Posted By: spartan1961 @ 10/18/2007 4:26:19 PM
Comment: Another huge supporter of Fareed Zakaria here. His articles are among the best, most thought provoking, and content filled published anywhere. If anything should be dropped, it is the "conventional wisdom" wise guy. That is so "grade school."