A Justice’s Candid Opinions
Clarence Thomas has been a polarizing figure for nearly two decades. He says he's just doing his job.
It's impossible to forget those hearings 16 years ago when Clarence Thomas was nominated by George H.W. Bush for the Supreme Court. Even now, many see Thomas as a polarizing figure, although he stresses that he sees himself as a federal judge—not the ideologue he has been pictured to be. He also claims that the court is much less ridden by acrimony than the rest of Washington. He spoke to NEWSWEEK's Lally Weymouth last week about the hearings, his time on the court and his compelling new memoir, "My Grandfather's Son." Excerpts:
Weymouth: Why did you write the book?
Thomas: It started when my brother died. I suddenly realized I'm the last person in the house. There's nobody left who is going to tell the story. We both revered our grandfather. We were his biggest cheerleaders.
Although he didn't sound so nice when he kicked you out of his house.
I think he did the right thing. I think it was a kick in the pants. He used to go off in the woods by himself—he always said he was hunting but he rarely came back with anything—and I think it was just to think and to, as he used to say, "mull things over." I often wonder now how many times he second-guessed himself for doing that.
So you wanted to tell your story.
I had to tell it. Because there are people who [had] told portions of it but some of it was wrong. They'd say that I went to college on a "Martin Luther King Scholarship." I didn't. I was a transfer student. People have their own template and they impose it. I just wanted to tell the story as best I could—checking back with my mother and some of my relatives to make sure I didn't overstate anything. I have this hope that maybe in telling it there will be something in there for somebody who is still trying to live their life—especially some kids.
The court today seems so divided. It seems like the votes are always 5 to 4.
Yes, but that doesn't mean that the court doesn't get along. [We get] along just fine as an institution, as friends, as colleagues—it's a wonderful place. The mere fact that people disagree doesn't carry over into how they treat each other. That is what I thought Washington was going to be when I came to town. I didn't think for a moment that because I didn't agree with somebody meant I was going to be hated. It wasn't until I went into the Reagan administration that I started feeling that lash.
Why do you never speak in oral arguments?
It's not a necessary part of the job. The court used to be very quiet. This [speaking] is all new. Justice [Harry] Blackmun asked no questions, and nobody beat on him about it. I ask more than he did. Justice [William] Brennan rarely asked questions, Justice [Thurgood] Marshall told stories, but he rarely asked questions.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next Page »


Loading Menu
Member Comments
Posted By: adamholden @ 10/18/2007 3:22:17 PM
Comment: Hey Uncle Clarence - way to hold a grudge!
Posted By: adamholden @ 10/18/2007 3:21:51 PM
Comment: Enter Your Comment
Posted By: brooklyn11234 @ 10/18/2007 11:37:38 AM
Comment: Clarence Thomas is a credit to the court and all this nation aspires to be -- thank God he doesn't just follow the "political/racial thought dictatorship", as sojournor so aptly describes it. It is time for African Americans to accept the fact that many of the so-called leaders of the left, whether in politics or academia or even from the pulpit, have not always led individuals to a position of strength other than, too often, themselves. It is in the spirit of sojournor's comment that I hope all people, regardless of the color of their skin, will be given the opportunity to have independent thought and respected for their intellect and not demonized for having "incorrect thoughts", as Mr. Thomas has been by so many on the left, particularly racist liberals.