Not Really Feeling It
A new book tries to make sense of the gripping, grating psychodrama that is the Clintons' marriage.
Never mind the man she's married to, Hillary Clinton isn't big on feelings. "Unthinking emotion," she wrote a friend in college, "has always been pitiful to me." In "For Love of Politics," Sally Bedell Smith's new book on Bill and Hillary Clinton's marriage during their White House years, the First Lady is a woman determined not to surrender to emotion, even when her husband and the nation have. While President Clinton idles away an hour hugging his way through a rope line at a Democratic Leadership Council fund-raiser, his wife, backstage, waits patiently to depart. As the president admits on TV to an affair with Monica Lewinsky, the First Lady waits in the White House solarium and greets staffers with a smile. Chelsea, the dutiful daughter, tries hard to mimic mom: "Emotions aren't rational," she tells friends.
Now Senator Clinton is moving toward the Democratic presidential nomination, and emotions have little place in her campaign. Even discussions about her marriage, that gripping, grating psychodrama, come off as cerebral and qualified—when the candidate and her staff choose to have them at all. The Clintons' marriage is important, they say, because it gave her the unparalleled experience of seeing a presidency up close. Except not "up close" in the dynastic sense; Clinton, they say, is an accomplished senator and an independent woman. Except not "independent" in the separate-lives/marriage-of-convenience sense; theirs, they say, is in every way a real marriage. Either way, the Clintonites contend, all that is irrelevant now.
Smith does not agree. A biographer who's written on Pamela Harriman, Princess Diana and Jackie and Jack Kennedy, she has a keen instinct for history made inside of marriages. She knows the irrational is often most important. Her book is narrower than other recent Clinton biographies, which deal with the nuts and bolts of her career, but is perhaps more relevant. Certainly, it is more subversive. Homing in on "the push and pull" between them and their love of politics, Smith presents a story Clinton isn't eager to remember: how her marriage made and then nearly wrecked her career.
Smith's Hillary Clinton wants only to be a public woman, a wonk and a warrior for the Clintons' noble causes. Arriving in the White House, she and her husband make her status clear; staffers call her "the Supreme Court," mindful that the First Lady had the final say. She strives for cool detachment, but her husband's coterie sees the cracks. They are "wimps," she tells them in tirades, men who "don't have balls" and "don't know how to fight." (Neither Clinton talked to Smith.) Quickly, her real target emerges, the president himself. "She knew how to push his buttons," a senior official tells Smith.
The president seeks comfort, often in the wrong places. Smith dispenses with the global do-gooder Bill Clinton of recent years in favor of the old rake known so well in the '90s. He is dazzled by Harriman, his septuagenarian ambassador to France—"seventy-five years old, and she has really nice legs"—and he fiddles with the seating chart at a New York City fund-raiser to sit next to the fawning actress Sharon Stone. Hillary hears talk about alleged infidelities, but takes "refuge in denial," even in the storm of Lewinsky. "She knew intellectually there was a problem, an addiction," a close friend tells Smith, "but she still believed he could never be that insane."
Some of Smith's juiciest material concerns the supporting cast trying to make sense of Hillary and Bill's dynamic. Most intriguing is the portrait of Chelsea, informed by rare reporting inside her circle of friends. Smith's Chelsea is a serious, self-conscious girl who worries over her diet and appearance and struggles in school during the dark days of impeachment. She adopts her parents' worst coping mechanisms, feeling the pressure to be "always grown up." During Monica, "she couldn't say, 'This is awful and I hate you'," one friend tells Smith. "She had her image to preserve."
- 1
- 2
- Next Page »



Loading Menu
Member Comments
Posted By: Bruch @ 05/24/2008 10:24:59 AM
Comment: I have always thought of Hillary as an egomaniac of the highest degree...power-hungry, greedy,do-anything, say-anything to achieve her desired results. She is a proven liar and rather pathetic in her attempts to promote herself as a champion of the middle class, white older women,under-educated population. What does she really know about being "middle class", she who has millions ijh her own right, and continues to benefit from taxes paid by citizens with Secret Service protection, paid staffm etc?
I watched her down a shot of Crown Royal and wondered how effective she would be in the Muslim countries as the commander-in-chief of our nation. How could they possibly have any respect for her?
Then she switches to beer and is proud of the fact that un-educated voters want her. Can that mean that because they ARE un-educated, they can't understand the power of politics and therefore can be swayed by her type of rhetoric? I saw a picture of some of her supporters with one holding a "coirrected" sign..having misspelled her name!
I dread the day should she actually become our president.
Posted By: wendy-franklin @ 01/22/2008 3:54:32 PM
Comment: Are the Clintons an actual married couple or a strategic political alliance with a white-knuckled grip on power? The American public certainly views them as the latter. Nobody thinks it is a coincidence that their staying together increased Hillary's viability in her White House bid. It is laughable that Hillary Clinton proudly trumpets family values. Didn't the Clintons forfeit those political points in the 90s amidst the soap opera of their own completely dysfunctional family's soap opera?
Posted By: mari2JJ @ 11/14/2007 11:45:06 PM
Comment: In fact I am cutting and pasting this tripe to send to the CIA.