Not Really Feeling It

After reading this article, I can better understand why President Clinton had so many affaris. Hillary is a heartless, unemotional, hard-ass ***. What man in there right mind would want a wife like that, let alone their President.

EMOTIONAL OR NOT, AMERICA HAS NO NEED OF A SOCIALIST SUCH AS HILLARY CLINTON, HER IDEAS FOR GOVERNING ARE OLD, AND HAVE FAILED TIME AND AGAIN. SHE CAN DRESS THEM UP AND TRY TO MAKE THEM SOUND FRESH AND SOMETHING THE AMERICAN PEOPLE NEED. NOT SO, SOCIALISM IS SOCIALISM, IT DEPRESSES THE INDIVIDUAL SPIRIT AND REMOVES MOTIVATION TO EXCEL. TAKE A HISTORY LESSON AMERICA, HILLARY DID AND THOUGHT THAT THE SOVIET UNION HAD A GOOD IDEA, AND SHE THINKS SHE CAN DO IT BETTER.? PLEASE!!!

We have sunk to new lows as the press is unable to tag anything on Hillary in her record or actions they choose to attack her marriage. This is the act of a coward (both the author and any that put it in print). If Hillary defends her marriage she is seen as hurt or even weak if she ignores it they will say that she has not denied the report. This from a bandwagon riding press that did no investigation before the Iraq war and a press that has done little lately to deserve the spilled blood that has defended its freedom of the press for more than two hundred years. Ben Franklin is rolling over in his grave. We the people have grown tired of the little boys and girls that call them selves??? reporters. I think entertainers are more befitting or perhaps minstrels but not reporters. The term reporters should be reserved for those that understand the freedom they are guaranteed is for the benefit of the nation and that with out a free and investigating press the people can stay informed and therefore make rational choices as to whom they will vote for to lead this nation. If I knew of a reporter to use as an example I would name one but sadly I believe they must all be dead.

Enter Your Comment

Hey, It's their life, Clinton's marriage is their business. Who cares if they are both cold fish to each other.

Hillary is a very troubled, nasty, smart woman. She will do anything or say anything to get her way, regardless who or what is in the way. I don't like these qualifications in a man or woman. I would really like to see a woman president but not this one. She is nuts.

Enter Your Comment

Enter Your Comment

The spelling and grammar in the post by "God Bless America" says enough.

Hillary is all about denial. She is extremely good at ignoring anything that could derail her path to the Presidency - even though she should be facing it with eyes wide open. Just because she can handle the mechanics of politics does not mean she can be an effective leader.

"Simth's book about the Clinton's marriage reminds me of a story I once heard where the woman goes to the meat market and picks up a chicken and begins to smell it from top to bottom. She told the butcher that the chicken smelled. The butcher said, "Madam, could you pass a test like that?" I wonder if Smith's marriage could pass the "smell" test. I doubt it.
s pass the

Most serious adult women I interact with think Hilllary Clinton, "Are you kidding??"

God forgive her for being her own person, people think more about what they'd, and half the time haven't dealt with anything of the sort and on top of that everybody talk about what they'd do as president, I say what are you doing at your job, that you have that much time to waste worrying about things your say doesn't even matter in

Enter Your Comment

I read the article about Hillary and found it interesting, but it is still hard for me to believe that she is that two dimensional. Also, I don't think some statement she made in a letter to a friend in college would define her now, unless she outright adopted it in the present day. I mean, really, decades have passed and, among other things, she has a daughter now. Even if she resists giving into her emotions about Bill, you just can't do that with a child. That kind of love is completely real and relatively unexplainable, in my book.

I also find it interesting that, if Hillary still believes that stuff, that she clings to what I consider a completely false dichotomy --- between reason and emotion. I think both exist along a continuum and each affects the other, but the idea that they are two separate realms of human experience was invented by the dominant culture (read that: men) because they are afraid of powerful emotions, especially those evoked by the women in their lives.

About time they start focusing on her marriage. It is not the marriage of love, but convienance. It is not a marriage based on truth and credibility. It certainly is not a marriage where the husband trully wants the wife. The wife wants a philanderer? Only to get elected. This is a shame and a joke. I'd much rather take a man who is honest and has never cheated than one who apolized for it. Self respect above all else.