Not Really Feeling It

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: mari2JJ @ 10/15/2007 4:10:40 PM

    This is truly one of the most inane piece of tabloid journalism I have ever read. It just bugs all these right wing monsters that the Clinton's are still together and that they are doing so well now. The idea that some outsider can creep around to Clinton friends and reach fair and accurate conclusions is the height of stupidity. It is another hit job and really just shows how desperate so many are to try to derail Hillary Clinton.
    I have called several friends and all they say is that it makes her look far more grown up and ready for the presidency.

  • Posted By: It's Jo @ 10/15/2007 4:06:31 PM

    Hillary, like her fake marriage(only to further HER career, and hang onto Bill's coattails) is trying to be ALL things to All people-especially young female voters-NOW org.to which she is pandering for votes. I hope they
    like the Hollywood crowd, don't fall for her phony traits. She is goal oriented,conniving, and when she wants to destroy her enemies, she falls back on her Radical/Socialist Mentor, Saul Alinsky-who taught her HOW to destroy ANYONE, ANYTHING THAT STANDS IN HER PATH. True that she/Bill hated the Secret Service people assigned to protect them, the Military(which he dodged the draft) and many of the W.House Staff.
    If you want to further KNOW the REAL Hillary/Bill-suggest you go to: Google Video-The Obstruction of Justice:
    "THE MENA CONNECTION", where you can SEE/HEAR for yourselves what lengths the Clinton's would stoop to in achieving 'their lust for Power/Money. David Geffen, of the Hollywood crowd, 'outed the Clinton's for what they really are"-Liars to the best degree, as they both can do it with such ease". Too bad, that others
    there, and the young women of NOW, don't realize Hillary would 'step over dead bodies-to attain her goals', AND, she did. ALSO, Look in on: 1984ArkansasMotherOfTheYear.com It will also show you, what these
    Power/Money Mongers have/would do to attain another "reign". You ALL owe it to yourselves to KNOW truth,
    and NOT just the Clinton's distorted version of it. Many, have died as the result of trying to get the truth out to the public.

  • Posted By: tradanita @ 10/15/2007 10:32:54 AM

    Just keep telling people she is smart and accomplished and they will believe it. What a bunch of sheep the American people are. The Democrats don't run the country.....the media does. The masses hear just what the press wants us to hear. I can't even listen anymore.

    • Posted By: Stella1 @ 10/15/2007 3:59:53 PM

      Hmm, I`m guessing you believe everything the right wing propaganda machine tells you.

  • Posted By: Slide Rule @ 10/15/2007 3:42:41 PM

    It baffles me that millions of voters are willing to reinstate the Clintons to the White House who had their chance already, and literally imploded upon themselves exposing for the world to see how disfuntional their marriage was/is, and that it is their turn once again to be in charge. There is not another couple out of a populace of 300 million that can't do the job better? In the final analysis: A nation of sheep driven by the media pick. A country that no longer knows how to read or come to their own conclusion without being told what to do or how to elect.

    • Posted By: Jose.Miranda @ 10/15/2007 3:56:14 PM

      Please define dysfunctional marriage.
      Should I or do you want me to believe that none in your family is in a dysfunctional marriage?
      Slide your rule to the middle if not to the left please.

    • Posted By: Jose.Miranda @ 10/15/2007 3:50:13 PM

      Ask yourself anyone in your family who's marriage is not dysfunctional.
      Slide your rule to the left guy!

  • Posted By: Connie151 @ 10/15/2007 3:50:10 PM

    Forget the Clintons; I would instead love to see someone--anyone--dissect the Bush marriage. Why is it that the mainstream media doesn't address the rumors that they are pretty much living separate lives? How is that a wife (who used to be a Democrat) and her adult daughters stand by and watch him eviscerate women's health programs?

  • Posted By: mattjam2000 @ 10/15/2007 3:41:04 PM

    Enter Your Comment

  • Posted By: Slide Rule @ 10/15/2007 3:38:04 PM

    Enter Your Comment

  • Posted By: hoosiernick @ 10/15/2007 3:25:32 PM

    What a dichotomy! The candidates are supposed to have emotion on the issues, yet be cold-bloodeed enough to send our troops into harm's way. The story indicates Mrs. Clinton is no guarantee that the heart will be heard from while pondering potentially flawed intelligence that indicates Iran has acquired WMD's. If her potential for compassion is what is alarming the right, let me assure them they're not in any danger.

  • Posted By: maddlizz @ 10/15/2007 3:18:20 PM

    There will be hundreds of more books written about the couple after President Hillary completes her two terms in the White House.

  • Posted By: hf201 @ 10/15/2007 3:17:11 PM

    I disagree this is biased or a "love letter." As someone who has yet to pick a candidate for 2008, this makes me lean away from Sen. Clinton. I don't want someone in the White House who tries to make all decisions out of a "cool detachment" from emotion. Not every challenge can be answered with logic. Give me an intellectual with a good heart any day. I don't want someone who denies their feelings leading my country.

  • Posted By: dirkdiggler @ 10/15/2007 2:29:33 PM

    This is a loveletter from Newsweek, planted by The Clintons. The entire story is predicated on driving home "Hillary is not some emotional woman, Hillary is logical and controlled." Certainly a line of argument that Clinton campaigners would want addressed.

    "Jonathon Darman " is certainly not an investigative reporter. Cooperative is a better word.

  • Posted By: Reality Bytes @ 10/15/2007 11:22:03 AM

    Enter Your Comment

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse