She watched Bill pardon seriously questionable charcaters in his last day , while she made sure to steal anything not nailed down including the china. Is it any wonder she overlooks the moral flaws in her husband?
She watched Bill pardon seriously questionable charcaters in his last day , while she made sure to steal anything not nailed down including the china. Is it any wonder she overlooks the moral flaws in her husband?
i support hilary all the way
Enter Your Comment
OH, Lord help us all if that happens. It's bad enough that we had to endure either of them during their previous presidential hoopla. But to have them return with HER is positively frightening.
No, what is frightening is that we have George W. Bush for another f***ing year....
Last time I checked, becoming a President has a lot to do with power. Hillary Clinton's desire for power is not abnormal in any circumstances. I think that since she is a woman, this power should be especially granted to her.
Way off she doesnt deserve and sure hasnt earned it yet not by a long shot so get real
Her unwillingness to deal with infidelity in it's proper form shows just how much of a pigeon she really is, and will be if in the white house.
If she can not do right by her husband, are we to believe she will do right by the United States? That was an unforgivable action on her husband's part, and she chose to ignore it for political gain. Whats next to ignore?
Her unwillingness to deal with infidelity in it's proper form shows just how much of a pigeon she really is, and will be if in the white house.
If she can not do right by her husband, are we to believe she will do right by the United States? That was an unforgivable action on her husband's part, and she chose to ignore it for political gain. Whats next to ignore?
So, we can't talk about the color of the person, we can't talk about the raceof the person, but it is okay to talk about somebody being a male or a female (man or a woman). Come on, first of all, if each of us individually not let the thoughts of a person being a man or woman to make a judgment on their title and positin, then we have the right to talk about the qualifications. Most supporters of H. Clinton only mentions that she is a woman? Why is that? Do woman feel inferior? [Please don't say that is the world perceives, yada, yada. Each one of us constitute the world, and if we part of the world, no point in blaming others!]
Also, leadership is about managing emotions, but definitely "Not Having emotions". If we want us to led by a person who has no emotions, why don't we all vote for an Android? It will be a better President, isn't it?
Not having emotions, or too much of emotions, in English we refer to them as "Callous", and not kind [Yes, I know callous means "no feelings", but feelings come out of emotions. No emotions => No feelings!]
At least my position is: I want to be led by a caring, intelligent, person with feelings and the person who depicts right level of emotions, not by a machine, or a faceless, feelingless, tyrannical ruler!
We americans, care, care for our family and friends, care for our relationships, care for the world, and it has to be shown from the top of our leadership!
What about the person who would drive his own vehicle all across the country on his dime and no fund raisers and spend his time to try and get a country to back an unknown against the money and power of the 2 biggest parties. Isnt that why we fought for freedom to get away from tyranny that also comes with money and power. To give the power to the biggest bidder i think we have lost the idea of free elections and follow the biggest spender and who ever advertises and gets in front of the most people. Give me someone who really cares and who isnt in it for the motive of power or what they get from their certain interest groups.
I personally believe that experiences such as the one Hillary and Bill Clinton had only open the eyes to the world that even the most powerful people in the country have the same problems as everyone else. I think that since this is one of the first instances that the public saw of this, it can be hard to accept. Sometimes we think that famous people have a perfect life, not realizing that although they are famous, they still face everyday situations similar to ours. I give more power to Hillary Clinton to work through that during the situation she was facing at the time. I also give her even more credit to forgive--because although forgivness is not an easy thing, it is not a bad thing either. I commend her strength--no matter how she got through it, she did.
I think , Hillary Clinton can be a Great President of the United States of America, and she will make history, i'm very sure of that, and all people have problems in their marriage, She is like me, like you, Humans and she forgive Bill.
Balderdash!!!!! Are you stuck back in the Middle Age???? This is a thinking, strong woman whose direction this Country sorely needs. The men haven't done such a great job in the last 8 years.
So if I understand your comment correctly, we should elect Hillary simply because she is a woman? We should pretend that her political track record is non-existant? We should look the other way when she votes for or against something and then denies doing so? I personally could not care less what gender our next president is, I simply hope that man or woman, they do a good job. Hillary's political track record does not suggest that she a person we can trust to run this country. It is too early yet for me to have decided as yet who I will cast my vote for, but it wil not be Hillary Clinton.
Not when she is thinking of her own self purpose to be in office to get her own agenda done with out working it out in the senate.
Hiliary Clinton? Most serious adult women voters I speak with clearly say, "Are you kidding?"
Well, I'm an intelligent adult woman and I say bring her on.... only someone who has lived under a rock for the past (almost) 8 years would say that.....
Okay, I think I have now heard it all, someone else wrote since when did emotionalism become a political issue? I couldn't agree more. This is CRAZY, I can't believe how many of you have said she needs to go home and fix her marriage before she tries to take on the country... hmmmm okay well since over 50% over marriages fail these, I THINK SHE'S DOING PRETTY DAMN WELL!
Women can shout "women's lib" and "we're equal to men and can do the same job BETTER" all they want. It doesn't matter! The fact of the matter is, we ARE DIFFERENT! Why does any woman want to be like a man? We're beautiful, curvatious, glowing, we carry babies and bring them into this world...we soothe them when they cry...we lift our husbands up when they get passed over for the long-awaited promotion. I LOVE my role as a woman, and to deny who I AM inside my body, heart and mind...well, that would make me pretty crabby too. Be proud to be a woman, for you were also "fearfully and wonderfully made" to be the heart and sould that drives our society to be better. You don't have to lack emotions to make wise decisions. You simply need wisdom and good judgment. These things come with time, experience and a watchful eye. Supression of our emotions is never a wise decision. Emotions are real, and must be experienced. Otherwise, we become robots...non-human. Is that the kind of person we need running the best country in the world? The country that everyone claims to despise, yet they keep flocking to in droves?
FearfullyAndWonderfullyMade, you have said it all. I agree with you 100%. Its really pathetic to see so many women competing with men to be more 'manly' than men, all in the name of this women's lib nonsense. Fact is, though WOMEN ARE NOT INFERIOR TO MEN, WOMEN ARE DIFFERENT FROM MEN. We are created to be softer, more beautiful, more gentle, meeker, more sensitive, more delicate, The roles are different: WE ARE TO COMPLEMENT MEN, NOT TO REPLACE THEM. And it is
utter madness for some women to think it's the 'modern'thing to do to challenge men in masculinity. A cold, unfeeling,calculating woman without maternal instincts is definitely NOT feminine, just as a lily-livered, effeminate man is not masculine. If she wins, Hillary will NOT be the first woman President. She will be just another man in drag.
I could care less what Hillary does with her marriage. I felt sad for her and what she undoubtedly went through with Bill Clinton's adultery. However, if she wants to stay married, that's HER PROBLEM. But to PRETEND SHE IS HAPPY, IS PATHETIC and she isn't fooling anybody. Sadly, I don't believe a word she says. She is cold and shallow and has NO CREDIBILITY in my book. It will be a TRAGEDY for our country if she is our next president. I wouldn't vote for her if she were the ONLY ONE RUNNING. However, I will vote AGAINST HER - that's for sure!!!
What this country needs is a candidate that is a nobody from nowhere that looks at the country for what it is. For the people by the people not the rich or the middle class. But for all even the poor. Another president like lincoln or just some home grown country boy from nowhere who would look at all the aspects of what this country needs and get us back to the grass roots of freedom and democracy not who has the biggest war chest to win the vote. Give me a out of the way home town boy who just wants to see this country care for itself first then the rest of the world.
It is funny to read the negative connotations associated with Hillary's emotional strength. Isn't the historical view of emotional women the very reason why we've never had a woman candidate for president? This article does nothing but solidify my vote for Hillary. I want a president who can look at a situation and make a decision based on valid information. Wouldn't it be wonderful to have a "cerebral and qualified" president in the White House again?
wendiz.......Please explain.. Emotional strength is exactly what this country needs. NOT A COLD, CALCULATING PYTHON out for her personal gain. No, I do not think that "the historical view of emotional women" is the reason we haven't had a woman President. If you are talking about making a decision based on "valid information", then why wouldn't you consider the information and cover-up of Hillary Clinton. You want a President with her darkened background. God Help Us!!!!
In complete agreement wendiz.................
I am amazed at how people believe that a person can be one way in some parts of thier lives and another way in other areas. If Mrs. Clinton does not believe that emotions are important I would not trust her in the White House because if she has not emotions she will think twice to push things through that will hurt the majority of people in the United States. I feel sorry for someone that can so compartamentalize their lives that they can not be touched by emotions. I would not vote for this woman, she cannot be trusted.
It would be an unimaginable tragedy for the United States for Hillary Clinton to be our next president.
It would lead to unbearable tax increases, an unmanageable health care system and probable unconditional surrender to the terrorists in the middle east.
Amen Godhelpus - I can hardly believe she is a front running candidate. When did our voters lose their senses? She is power-mad (why she stays with Bill). Not only that, but a liar, and a thief......remember the robbing of the Whitehouse and the trashing of the "W" computer keys? Read Bay Buchannan's book and learn the TRUTH about her. Who wants MUCH higher taxes and government heathcare? I, for one do not want a "nanny state" where they take much of our earnings and do what they please. Do not we love our freedom? She is a wretched woman and a DISASTER FOR OUR BELOVED COUNTRY!!!
Enter comments if any for reporting abuse
Discuss