MODERN FAMILY

Kathleen Deveny

Illustration by Chris Gash for Newsweek

Your Child Was Out Of Line

When I was waiting to buy ice cream at a beach community near New York two months ago, I overheard something I haven't been able to forget. A 10- or 11-year-old boy standing in front of me made a smirky comment to his friends about how there were "too many Chinese people around." He was most likely referring to my 7-year-old daughter, who is adopted from China. Luckily she didn't hear what he said. But I did—and I didn't say anything. I didn't know the kid, and his parents weren't around. I told myself that it wouldn't accomplish anything and that it was none of my business. And I wasn't sure what to say in any event. My first impulse—"Do your parents know what a racist little monster you are?"—seemed a bit harsh. So I kept my mouth shut—and I still regret it.

I had bought into one of the many parenting taboos that have sprung up since I was a kid: no correcting other people's children. Maybe if it's your best friend's kid, or a child who is at a playdate at your house, you can politely suggest that throwing sand is a bad idea. But when I asked if it's ever appropriate to discipline other people's kids on a message board at UrbanBaby.com, posters recoiled. "Big No," was one typical response. Others said not unless a child is in physical danger.

The idea that we should reserve any editorial comments for our own little darlings has become so widely held that "Mad Men," the wonderful and creepy AMC series about a New York advertising agency in 1960, was able to play it for shock value. At a child's suburban birthday party, one of the dads slaps a neighbor's boy across the face for knocking over a drink. The kid's father rushes over—and takes the grown-up's side.

The moment made me gasp. And it drove home the point that our ideas about community parenting shift dramatically over time. In Colonial America, children expected to be disciplined by any adult. "Kids were not raised to internalize their own family's particular values, they were expected to share the community's values," says Stephanie Coontz, a professor of history and family studies at Evergreen State College. That began to change in the 1830s as class distinctions grew sharper. "Often it wasn't so much 'our family has different rules' as 'our type has different rules'," Coontz says.

In mid-20th-century suburbs, there was enough homogeneity that many parents welcomed a resurgence of community and of common discipline. I feel as though I spent much of my '60s childhood in Minneapolis being scolded by neighbors for cutting through their yards or throwing snowballs.

During the past 15 or 20 years, however, we have become less likely to discipline even our own children, and bristle when others try. "If someone criticizes your child, it's like they've criticized your whole family, your whole life," says Dr. Wendy Mogel, author of "The Blessing of a Skinned Knee."

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: William.Demuth @ 11/05/2007 3:30:57 PM

    Let me make one position quite clear. Be the person liberal or conservative, Christian or Jew, ANY individual who raises a hand to my child will be beaten within an inch of their lives. No one EVER has the right to use force against another for speaking their mind, especially against a child.

  • Posted By: vf98 @ 10/31/2007 1:36:12 AM

    You are sadly mistaken if you think that being a stay-at-home parent is the quick fix answer to what ails our children. I am a mother of two elementary schoolers, and both my husband and I work full time, but both of our children have been raised to know the correct way to act. They are aware that courtesy and respect for others is expected, and that being attuned to the feelings of those around them is essential to being happy themselves. And yet, they spend every afternoon, Monday to Friday, at after school care! How is that possible? We teach by example, and make sure that we are as quick to praise as we are to scold. We are involved with their activities, and at the same time we involve them in discussions about serious topics such as homelessness, poverty, and race/gender issues. The result is two kids who are enthusiastic in their pursuits and genuinely care about their peers and those less fortunate than they are. At the same time, many of their peers have moms who do not work and stay home full time, but are the brattiest, most self-centered monsters you can imagine. I argue that it is quality, not quantity, that makes the difference.

  • Posted By: damon_sandiego @ 10/30/2007 12:19:09 AM

    Very good comments, PsiCop, and so very much too the point. I opt for getting back to parenting the way I was raised: less government interference, and more parental influence! From the local police, the school board, the county office of child protection, to the Supreme Court, enough is enough.

    Parental abuse does exist, and it should be quelled in the strongest way possible. But to blanket a whole society and/or a whole culture based on those bad examples has left our parental fabric badly worn, torn, and forlorn

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

 

Up and Coming Newsweek Stories on Digg

Discover more Newsweek content on Digg