What Happens When They Grow Up

Teenagers and young adults are the emerging face of autism as the disorder continues to challenge science and unite determined families.

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

Chicken and potatoes. Chicken and potatoes. Danny Boronat wants chicken and potatoes. He asks for it once, twice ... 10 times. In the kitchen of the family's suburban New Jersey home, Danny's mother, Loretta, chops garlic for spaghetti sauce. No chicken and potatoes, she tells Danny. We're having spaghetti. But Danny wants chicken and potatoes. Chicken and potatoes. His 12-year-old sister, Rosalinda, wanders in to remind her mother about upcoming basketball tryouts. His brother Alex, 22, grabs some tortilla chips and then leaves to check scores on ESPN. His other brother Matthew, 17, talks about an upcoming gig with his band. Danny seems not to notice any of this. "Mom," he asks in a monotone, "why can't we have chicken and potatoes?" If Danny were a toddler, his behavior would be nothing unusual. But Danny Boronat is 20 years old. "That's really what life with autism is like," says Loretta. "I have to keep laughing. Otherwise, I would cry."

Autism strikes in childhood, but as thousands of families like the Boronats have learned--and thousands more are destined to learn--autism is not simply a childhood disorder. Two decades into the surge of diagnoses that has made autism a major public health issue, a generation of teenagers and young adults is facing a new crisis: what happens next?

As daunting as that question may be, it's just the latest in the endless chain of challenges that is life for the dedicated parents of children with autism. Twenty years ago, they banded together--largely out of desperation--to raise awareness of a once rarely diagnosed, often overlooked disease. They are united by the frustration of dealing with a condition that has no known cause and no cure. They have lobbied passionately to get better education for their kids and more money for research into autism, a neurological disorder characterized by language problems, repetitive behaviors and difficulty with social interaction. At the same time, more sophisticated epidemiology has revealed the true magnitude of the problem. Autism is now estimated to affect from one in 500 to one in 166 children--or as many as 500,000 Americans under 21, most male. That includes individuals with a wide range of abilities--from socially awkward math whizzes to teens who aren't toilet trained--but who all fit on what scientists now consider a spectrum of autism disorders.

The culmination of much of this parental activism is the Combating Autism Act, which was pushed by a collection of advocacy groups like Cure Autism Now, led by Hollywood producer Jon Shestack and his wife, Portia Iverson; Autism Speaks, started by Bob Wright, CEO and chairman of NBC Universal, and the Deirdre Imus Environmental Center for Pediatric Oncology. The bill unanimously passed the U.S. Senate in August but was blocked in the House by Texas Republican Joe Barton, chair of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce. In a September meeting, Barton told autism activists that he would continue to oppose their legislation, which earmarks $945 million for research over the next five years, because it conflicted with his own proposal to reform the National Institutes of Health. As a result, autism advocates began inundating him with faxes and phone calls and lambasting him in the press. To advance the cause of research, radio host Don Imus joined in and pressured Barton on the air, calling the congressman, among other things, "a lying, fat little skunk from Texas."

Now that the Democrats have won the House, Barton will lose his chairmanship in January and NEWSWEEK has learned that he is attempting to pass a compromise version of the bill before then. If passed, the House bill would fund a new push for early diagnosis, which is critical to starting therapy as soon as possible. In a particular victory for parents, the legislation specifies that the research oversight committee should include at least one person with autism and a parent of a child with autism.

The House bill authorizes money for research into many questions, including whether environmental factors may trigger autism. One point of contention: the Senate bill mandated a specific amount of money for the NIH to research the role environmental factors might play in causing autism. But Barton resisted, and now the specificity about how much should be spent and where has been lost in the compromise version. Still, a Barton bill could come up for a vote as early as the first week in December and the legislation, says Alison Singer, the mother of a daughter with autism and an executive at the advocacy group Autism Speaks, "is probably the single most important thing that could happen besides the cure."

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Al Gore's Climate-Change Evolution
Al Gore's Climate-Change Evolution

Using emotion to convince people to change.

Heaven Can Wait
Heaven Can Wait

A new book promises proof of eternal life.

The World's Biggest Foods
The World's Biggest Foods

Monster edibles from around America.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: momtotwo @ 02/28/2009 9:05:20 AM

    Seriously, I get so tired of the subtle lies laced throughout articles like this one. Overall this article was good, and brought up quite a few interesting points, but makes an attempt to propagate the myth that the rise in autism is solely due to broader diagnosis and awareness. If that were so, why wasn't there an equally dramatic drop in those diagnosed as "mentally retarded" or "emotionally disturbed"? I think most of us can SEE the difference, even without "scientific studies" (of dubious motivation). When I was growing up there was that one strange kid in my class, the one totally obsessed with Ninja Turtles, who probably would now be diagnosed with Asperger's. That was it. I can't think of a single other child I was in contact with who would fit today's diagnosis. Now I can't even walk into WalMart without seeing multiple children clearly and obviously on the spectrum. Time to wake up guys. There's more going on here than a change in diagnosis.

  • Posted By: hexxa @ 02/27/2009 2:39:31 PM

    What makes you think reproductive choices have anything to do with it? If it became more and more prominent around 1943, there are a million other changes it could be. There have been enough other changes in food preparation and additives, in manufacturing, in prenatal medicine, and after all in DIAGNOSIS that ithere seems no reason to blame birth control unless you have an ulterior motive.

  • Posted By: parent of lisa @ 11/17/2008 8:09:59 AM

    I never used birth control, fertility drugs, and delivered by 27 years of age. The term used by you "these people" is a bit disturbing for parents of a beautiful 13 years girl that happens to have Autism.

    Before you make your observations and sit in judgement of Mrs. Bowers walk one day in her shoes. It seemed to me that she and her psychologist friend were just allowing her son to experience a "normal" activity such as dating; however, with the realization that her son has a disability she wanted to make sure it went smoothly and safely.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now