I have to start with, there is no "right" age to marry. In an era of a divorce on every block, waiting for the right person is so important.
That said, I married at 22, am now still very happily married and at 26 have had two children and we are done. I am ecstatic that when I am 43 I will have an empty nest. I will, hopefully, be quite young when I have grandchildren, able to run around and play with them and watch them grow up into adulthood, perhaps see great-grandchildren. At 43 the people who by choice or by lot in life waited to start families, will be dealing with the terrible two's and babies waking them at all hours. That is if they can still have biological children. I conceived very easily to children not at increased risk of problems like down sydrome or schitzophrenia (which research has shown older fathers can contribute to, autism as well). I have had the energy to put up with the sleep deprivation and a toddler's very active lifestyle. I lived the single carefree life for 4 years prior to marriage. It had its perks, but I am much happier now and have never felt any longing for "freedom". I will enjoy freedom when I am older and actually have, hopefully, far more money in my pocket than when I was 20.
I'm sure many will get fired up over this. I truly hope not. This is my very personal story. I know many younger mothers who would have been better suited to have been a good decade older when having children. I know that many people in the late 30's and 40's have healthy happy children, or adopted, and wouldnt have it any other way. I know many people have great times being sinlge through their 20's, it just wasnt for me.
For my two daughters, I would encourage them to marry when they feel the time is right, for them, IF they would want to do that. I am young, and my views are different, I also see no problem with never marrying. My husband and I would be just as happy today if we hadnt, our main reason was in fact that I needed his better-than-mine insurance in order to have the children we wanted. We all have different paths in life and there is simply no right or wrong to this. Science is making leaps and bounds with fertility, even with egg freezing research. And as I said, adoption is a beautful thing, something I am considering, to get the boy God/Nature did not give us.
I wish everyone the best and all to do what makes them happy. Life can be amazing at any age, marriage or no, children or no, it is what you make of it. I am very pleased with mine so far.
Marriage by the Numbers
Twenty years since the infamous 'terrorist' line, states of unions aren't what we predicted they'd be.
Email To A Friend
Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.
When Laurie Aronson was 29, she had little patience for people who inquired why she still wasn't married. "I'm not a little spinster who sits home Friday night and cries," she'd say. As she passed 35, however, and one relationship after another failed to lead to the altar, she began to worry. "Things were looking pretty bleak," she says. But then a close friend's brother--a man she'd known for years--divorced. Slowly their friendship blossomed into romance. At 39, Aronson married him, becoming Laurie Aronson Starr and the stepmom to his three kids. Then, after five years of infertility treatment, she became pregnant with a son who'll be 4 in July. "My parents are thrilled--it's a relief for everyone," says Starr, now 49. "I wish I could have found the right person earlier and had more children. But I'm ecstatic."
As happy endings go, hers has a particularly delicious irony. Twenty years ago this week, Aronson was one of more than a dozen single women featured in a news-week cover story. In "The Marriage Crunch," the magazine reported on new demographic research predicting that white, college-educated women who failed to marry in their 20s faced abysmal odds of ever tying the knot. According to the research, a woman who remained single at 30 had only a 20 percent chance of ever marrying. By 35, the probability dropped to 5 percent. In the story's most infamous line, NEWSWEEK reported that a 40-year-old single woman was "more likely to be killed by a terrorist" than to ever marry. That comparison wasn't in the study, and even in those pre-9/11 days, it struck many people as an offensive analogy. Nonetheless, it quickly became entrenched in pop culture and is still routinely cited in TV shows and news stories.
Across the country, women reacted with fury, anxiety--and skepticism. "The popular media have invented a national marital crisis on the basis of a single academic experiment ... of dubious statistical merit," wrote Susan Faludi, then a 27-year-old reporter at the San Jose Mercury News, who saw the controversy as one example of a backlash against feminism. Boston Globe columnist Ellen Goodman wrote: "How gleefully they warn that an uppity woman may be overqualified for the marriage market. Reach too high, young lady, and you'll end up in the stratosphere of slim pickings."
Twenty years later, the situation looks far brighter. Those odds-she'll-marry statistics turned out to be too pessimistic: today it appears that about 90 percent of baby-boomer men and women either have married or will marry, a ratio that's well in line with historical averages. And the days when half of all women would marry by 20, as they did in 1960, only look more anachronistic. At least 14 percent of women born between 1955 and 1964 married after the age of 30. Today the median age for a first marriage--25 for women, 27 for men--is higher than ever before.
Not everyone wants to marry, of course. And we're long past those Jane Austen days when being "marriage-minded" was primarily a female trait; today many men openly hope for a wife just as much as women long for a husband. The good news is that older singles who desire a spouse appear to face far kinder odds nowadays. When the Census last crunched the numbers in 1996, a single woman at 40 had a 40.8 percent chance of eventually marrying. Today those odds are probably even higher--and may be only slightly worse than the probability of correctly choosing "heads" or "tails" in a coin toss.
To mark the anniversary of the "Marriage Crunch" cover, NEWSWEEK located 11 of the 14 single women in the story. Among them, eight are married and three remain single. Several have children or stepchildren. None divorced. Twenty years ago Andrea Quattrocchi was a career-focused Boston hotel executive and reluctant to settle for a spouse who didn't share her fondness for sailing and sushi. Six years later she met her husband at a beachfront bar; they married when she was 36. Today she's a stay-at-home mom with three kids--and yes, the couple regularly enjoys sushi and sailing. "You can have it all today if you wait--that's what I'd tell my daughter," she says. " 'Enjoy your life when you're single, then find someone in your 30s like Mommy did'."
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next Page »









Discuss