www.papanews.it-AP
Stenico, in an undated picture

Vatican Sex Sting

An after-hours office meeting between a young man and a top Roman Catholic official has prompted a fresh inquiry into gay priests. What the investigation could mean for the Holy See.

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

It's another story the Vatican could have done without. A high-ranking church official in Rome is caught by a hidden camera making what appear to be advances to another man. The scenes, in which the priest questions the Roman Catholic church's teaching on homosexuality, are then broadcast on Italian television.

That's the position the Vatican, still trying to deal with the long-running fallout from pedophile priests, finds itself in after the official, Monsignor Tommaso Stenico—who has responsibility for matters relating to the clergy—was filmed during an encounter with a youth he was reported to have met on a gay Internet chat room.

The priest invited the young man to his office after work hours and, during the course of their conversation on homosexuality, started complimenting the youth on his appearance. The young man told the priest he was "about to commit something with me that is a sin in the eyes of God." Stenico, 60, replied: "No, I don't consider it a sin." When the youth questioned how the priest could ignore the church's teaching that homosexual acts are sinful, the priest cut short the meeting and showed him the door—but not before placing his hand on the back of his leg and saying, "You're so hot." The priest asked his guest not to talk with anyone on the way out.

Although the pictures and voices were heavily disguised by the program makers, who filmed it as part of an investigation into gay Catholic priests, Vatican officials recognised the office, confronted the priest, and promptly suspended him. Stenico has since denied he is gay and has claimed he was only pretending in order to gather information about people he believes are involved in a Satanic plot to discredit the church by seducing priests into homosexuality. "It was nothing more than an experiment," he said, "a study about the theme, and I have fallen in the trap, but I will explain it to my superiors."

Stenico will be given the chance to do that when he appears in front of a Vatican disciplinary tribunal, but his story is unlikely to convince a sceptical public. If he was indeed acting undercover, his superiors probably would have known about it. It's also unlikely he would have been authorised to act in such an underhanded way. "It's hugely embarrassing and outrageous," said one official, who cannot be named owing to the sensitivity of the issue.

The case has raised questions about the extent of homosexuality in the Vatican. Those who dismiss Stenico's explanation believe the priest may be part of a small "underground" gay community of Vatican officials. Some officials readily admit such a community exists, but according to one, "it's not a formal network through which they are able to protect themselves." Others have long regarded Rome as a haven for gay priests, sent to the Vatican because they would not survive in a parish. "Rome's famous for it," said one parish priest in Italy who asked not to be named. "They've got to go somewhere, and so are given something innocuous to do in Rome." For some, that perception was underscored last year, when a senior ranking monsignor was involved in a high-speed police chase after being pulled over in a Rome district known for male prostitution.

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
NEWSWEEK's 20/10
NEWSWEEK's 20/10

Our decade-in-review project recalls the highs and lows of the last 10 years.

Obama's Promises
Obama's Promises

Is the new president fulfilling his campaign pledges? Or falling short?

The Decade in 7 Minutes
The Decade in 7 Minutes

Video: A fast-paced review of the best and worst moments. Don't blink.

Accidental Celebrities
Accidental Celebrities

From Levi Johnston to Elian Gonzalez, these people never expected to be in the spotlight.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Shankardada2 @ 11/07/2007 10:31:30 PM

    Homosexuality should not to be condemned. But celibacy should be.

  • Posted By: Vegasman @ 11/05/2007 2:37:40 AM

    Glad to see you are so "well read" of the Bible. Can I safely assume that you haven't violated any of the teachings of the Bible? You don't eat any pork products (also forbidden in Leviticus)? Even something simpler, never violated any of the Ten Commandments? (Never used God's name in vein? Never disobeyed your parents? No work of any kind on the Sabbath? Never coveted anything of your neighbors? Wow!!! You are a saint!!! God bless you. Let he who is without sin cast the first stone! Please pick up your stone now and stone everyone else around you.

  • Posted By: TELLTHETRUTH @ 10/26/2007 8:45:32 PM

    thurnherr........ethnicity and religion are not synonymous with sexual orientation. they are apples and oranges. it baffles that homosexuals rank a sexual orientation with ethicity and/or religion. i am not homophobic. and i'll refrain from patronizing u by saying "some of my best friends are gay". (i hate that lame rhetoric). yeah im on the side that feels at birth a person may have a proclivity toward the same sex but i dont agree with such a lifestyle. anatomically its not natural. and for that i offer no excuse. so i do take sissue with the act. but value u as a person. when persons are allowed to comment on articles, etc, on a post board forum u cant wear your emotions on your sleeves. yes some may use the forum to spew venom but thats part of the "post forum" freedom. and that freedom is enjoyed by posters. certainly not by the editorial staff of newsweek or anyother media. appealing to newsweek is not the solution. (unless its one of their writers bashing gays in an article. and that would be unacceptable). lighten up. "john q public" will not be converted. the fight is not with newsweek but with people around u that may be homophobic and insensitive to your humanity. just remeber your sexual orientation is not and will not be akin to ethnicity and religion. and the country u choose to live in waxes puritanical when it comes to certain issues. it is what it is for now. u cant honour free speech then have doubts. what u really mean is u believe in censorship when it involves your own backyard. (no pun intended). bottom line? grow up and stop whining. or better yet call priest stenico here and seek refuge.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse