smallvictoriesusa.com
Pro-life activist Angela Michael next to her RV outside of Hope Clinic in Granite City, Ill. She has spent more than a decade living next to the clinic and attempting to dissuade women from having abortions.

Crossing the Line

The ripple effect of Missouri's controversial new abortion law goes far beyond its borders.

 
Sponsored by
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

 

On a Saturday morning in October, Hope Clinic draws a crowd of 100 protesters, some with signs depicting fetuses, others with Catholic rosaries—and all shouting and chanting outside the purple-trimmed building where abortions are performed in Granite City, Ill.

The protests are jarring to incoming patients. But they do little, if anything, to affect Allison Hile, the clinic's director of information and education. "I am so proud of what we do," says Hile, who has been counseling patients for 28 years. Hile has, after all, seen much worse at her clinic. She remembers the wreckage the day after it was bombed in 1982—the blast destroyed a third of the facility's physical plant. And she remembers when a pro-life extremist kidnapped one of the clinic's doctors that same year, holding him and his wife blindfolded for eight days. For over a decade now Hile has endured the presence of pro-life activist Angela Michael, who lives in an RV parked outside the clinic. Under the guise of being a Hope Clinic employee, Michael leads women into her trailer (billed as offering "A Window to the Womb") for ultrasounds and a chance to talk them out having an abortion. (Hile says she can find no record of Michael being a registered nurse in Missouri or Illinois.) After all that, a group of noisy protesters seems relatively benign.

But soon Hile and the rest of the staff at Hope Clinic may have more than shouts and signs to contend with. The clinic sits on the state line between Illinois and Missouri. And while it's just a 10-minute drive over the Mississippi River from Granite City to St. Louis, the ideological distance between the cities is far greater when it comes to abortion law. On the Missouri side of the river, lawmakers take a dim view of abortion rights. The pro-choice group NARAL gives the state an F in its rankings, while Illinois gets a C+. "Illinois law is in every aspect and way better than Missouri," says Pamela Sumners, executive director of NARAL Pro-Choice Missouri. "That's a pretty big river separating us."

While Hope Clinic may be governed by Illinois's more lenient laws, a large percentage of its patients come from Missouri for family planning and abortion services. So this summer, when the Missouri state legislature passed House Bill 1055, a law that Gov. Matt Blunt has called "one of the strongest pieces of pro-life legislation in Missouri's history," Hope Clinic began preparing for the possible ripple effects. As Hile explains it, should the new law pass constitutional muster—a decision that could be made within the next two months—it would likely leave the entire state of Missouri with one abortion clinic, at least for a time. And that could create an unmanageable influx of patients for Hope. "We'd be overwhelmed if we had to see not only the women who come to us now but many others," says Hile.

The Missouri bill is not an outright ban on abortion but rather a regulation that financially squeezes practitioners who perform the procedure to the point where many will no longer be able to function. The bill reclassifies any facility that performs five or more abortions each month as a surgical outpatient center, meaning it must comply with a number of specifications for things like hallway widths and ceiling heights.

Pro-life groups hail the legislation as a way to protect women's health—by ensuring that facilities are prepared to handle abortions, which are, after all, surgical procedures. "Women who seek abortions deserve to have the same level of surgical care," says Pam Fichter, president of Missouri Right to Life. "To not give them that same basic level of care would be a great disservice to women who are seeking abortions." The bill's sponsor, state Rep. Therese Sander, describes the regulation as an attempt to provide "the best possible service to women in crisis pregnancy no matter which way they choose go, whether life or abortion."

 
Discuss
Member Comments
  • Posted By: ghostmasseur @ 10/06/2008 8:30:19 AM

    Comment: bojack,

    There are problems with your idea of you having a "right" to your child.
    Every time that you have sex with your wife, do you do so with the intent of getting her pregnant? Also what if you are NOT married and had no intention of getting married to the woman you had sex with. I understand that for YOU personally that might not be the case, but for other men it is. Although I agree that the woman should use birth control, the man also has EQUAL responsiblity to use it. IF te only reason that he is not using it is that he want to get the woman pregnanat and does not let her know that, then he has acted in bad faith and is not even close to being on even standing with the woman.

    Additionally, you would not have equal standfing anyway. It is HER body that is being required to carry the pregnanacy to term. That means that SHE is the only one assuming any possible medical risks. She is the one who is also assuming the risk that it might affect her employment (I know that is should to but eality is not always fair.) From that perspective HER decision far outways the man's. And like it or not, borth control DOES fail. So even if she DID intend not to get pregnant and something went wrong she has shown the responsibility that some people mention and still got pregnenet. HER right to chose what to do with her body takes precedent. That is my opinion of course.

  • Posted By: bojack27 @ 10/02/2008 6:11:15 PM

    Comment: So you just kill them and your sane? You don't make any sense!

  • Posted By: bojack27 @ 10/02/2008 6:06:50 PM

    Comment: I have rights to my child .... I married the woman who gave birth to her ..... so what are you talking about....

Sponsored by
 
 
 
The Peek
 
 
STRATEGIES

Isn't it ironic: Xerox is hoping it can profit by teaching companies how to reduce their printing.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
 
NATIONAL SECURITY
Sponsored by
 
 
 
loadingLoading Menu