Inside Karen’s Crowded Mind

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: joanastrid @ 10/31/2007 10:24:49 AM

    Oh for pete's sake, this is getting ridiculous. People are citing Lenore Terr now? Anyone who wants you to read Terr as an example of scholarly research on DID is illustrating for you the depth of her ignorance about science and research. Lenore Terr is a clinician and not a researcher, and she embarrasses herself with the silly and pathetic arguments she makes, which have no grounding in science.. For god's sake, she is the woman who tries to cite experiments with SEA SLUGS as support for repression of traumatic experiences in human beings. She also was responsible for the imprisonment of George Franklin on murder charges based on the bogus repressed memories of his daughter, induced in therapy by a recovered memory quack. George Franklin was later released from prison after it was discovered that he had an iron-clad alibi for the day of the murder, and after it became clear that his daughter had lied about not being hypnotized by the charlatan who helped her recover her bogus "memories."

    The "research" supporting the concept of repression and dissociation of traumatic memories is a small, pitiful pile of stinking sewage. There have been several good reviews detailing the serious methodological problems of the studies, which render their conclusions useless. These range from drawing unwarranted conclusions from evidence that means nothing (such as inferring traumatic amnesia in a sea slug) to abominations in study design (e.g., assuming the existence of traumatic amnesia in a child who was too young at the time of the abuse to remember the incident anyway). Studies that claim to provide corroboration of recovered memories have been found to use highly questionable means of corroboration, such as using the testimony of a sister who is ALSO recovering repressed memories as evidence that the memories are true. In other ridiculous studies, the existence of some fragment of the memory apart from the abuse has been accepted as proof that the memory is real (e.g., The tree where the coven ate my baby is still there--therefore my memory is true!").

    It is long past time the mental health community purged itself of these charlatans and fools. I cannot believe we are still having these arguments in 2007.

  • Posted By: Rosie a whetstone @ 10/30/2007 2:30:49 PM

    Back again, i am in search of fellow Psychotherapists who are working with and have experience in working with clients with multiple personalities. linked to childhood sexual abuse. I have been struggling to find peers and supervisors who are experienced and can support me with this specific aspect of my work. I would be interested in any literature that could be reccomended, or specific courses that any of you know about specialising in in this subject. I have gained much from reading the comments on this site and feel that generaly they are beneficial. I was surprised at the naivety of some comments suggesting that it is easy to be happy and look to the future when some people are intrinsicly linked to the horrors of their past. My sense is that those with such naive views lack true understanding and empathy for individuals who are locked into a terrifying existence , and it is only throught the support of experienced genuine therapists that they can access the life they are entitled to.

    • Posted By: erlaia @ 10/31/2007 10:15:56 AM

      The ISSD is now known as the Internatonal Society for the Study of Trauma and Dissociation. Their website indicates that there are educational programs for clinicians interested in learning more, including two distance learning modules. This may be the resource that can prvoide you with peers steeped in pragmatic experience as well as educational components that can support your indivdual growth

    • Posted By: erlaia @ 10/30/2007 3:38:50 PM

      I am not a clinician, but I have,become a sophisticated user of therapeutic services. Look at the Internal family Systems model as a swift, easy to grasp way to help clients shape internal dialogue between previously dissociated parts. Information can be harvested via the website, selfleadership.org.

      In my own work, EMDR, helps enormously in processing repressed affect. It is not a magic shortcut, but it is a substantive working tool.

      In my own reading, I have dipped into Nathanson's work on affect, which translates Tompkins' understanding of innate affect into more accessible language . Author of some value are Kluft, Catherine Fine and Courteois. . And, I assume that you are familiar with the ISSD (international Society for the Study of Dissociation),.

      do be aware that dissociative competencies come in a wide array of intensities. Some folks, indeed, have non-coconscious parts, others maintain (relative) awareness as we shift personae. The latter frankly, are far more challenging to diagnose, as we present with less externalized life chaos, and our shifting personae is likely to be rather more subtle. it was for that reason that my dissociative competencies escaped notice by a skilled psychotherapist, only to be sorted out as I worked with a skilled EMDR practicing trauma therapist. Not all of us have lives that can be play-acted by Sally Field......The real challenge in accepting a diagnosis of DID is a recognition that the abuse happened, that it was severe, and that it mattered. For that reason, I/we resisted the diagnosis even as we recognized that it "explained so much".

      As I noted earlier, my therapeutic goal is not pure integration, as I am of the opinion that we all have a capacity for diverse personality, and seeking out a unitary personality strikes me as a bit of a chimera. What I have been able to do, with the help of a skilled therapist, is establish lines of commhncation based on internal self-respect, That allows me to be compassionate as we process profound memory and its associated affect, and then, quite critically for my adult life, look at the coping behaviors used in my youth, and replace them with behaviors that focus more on selfcare and self-respect.

      I hope this helps......

  • Posted By: induced1 @ 10/30/2007 5:58:03 PM

    I'm curious. Would you refer to Dr. Corey Hammond's (infamous) Greenbaum speech (easily found on any web search) and let us know if you find his published insights are 'balanced' or if they simply belong in Sterling's "Twilight Zone"?

    • Posted By: erlaia @ 10/31/2007 9:31:56 AM

      Again, I note that the field is filled with hysteria on both sides. I note that it is possible for a malignant therapist to reframe concepts for highly suggestible clients.

      As to the notion of governmental mind control experiments gone amok, I would note that there have been profound explorations of mental processes using the fundamental work of Sylvan Tompkins on innate affect, a set of research which led to the techniques that eventually allowed the entrapment of kim Philby, a noted Brit double agent. Does that mean that there is a secret cabal of folks creating Mancuhurian Candidates? I personally doubt it.

      Does the presence of a few malignant therapist engaged in 're-inactment" therapies cast doubt on the entire concept of dissocitaive identity disorder? I don't think so. You're reading a pop mag article with selective references to selected researchers and then assuming a blanket response based on that.

      I'm reminded of the anthropologist who came to the conclusion that "all Indians walk in single file" - at least the one he studied did..... the SA Mind article is partial, editorially limited and superficial.

      My trauma therapist has never used 'mind control" devices or tools, and a sufficient number of my memories have been validated by family members for me to know that I ain't mak'n up squat.

      The hysterical tone of your commentary suggests a defensiveness out of proportion to your knowledge base or the issue at hand. I suggest, if you want to engage in "plot theory", go march on the path you are on. If you want to be informed, read the authorities in the area.... established clinicians with substaqntive reputations. I've listed some of them in several postings on this site. When you've done that, then you can place that silly article in SA Mind into some perspective.

  • Posted By: trevorg @ 10/31/2007 2:48:08 AM

    Hey Choonzer: I think I'm getting it! You're trying to drum up business wherever you can get it! Hope I've thrown a wrinkle into your plans. I really don't give a damn about what you think, especially knowing you are less than a recognized (medical) professional. I find myself NOT to be rabid, nor do I feel I am spouting venom. On the contrary, I am trying to save vulnerable and troubled individuals from quacks like you!
    You see mister, I've got two dead girls and it's the fault of the brainwashing techniques of unlicensed/unregulated therapukes. There is no law against what they have done to my family and it's destructions, especially when they instructed my poor mentally ill daughter to divorce herself from her innocent family leaving my grandbaby in mortal danger! I have my daughter's medical charts and it states clearly that she had been suicidal 5 yrs BEFORE these crackpots kidnapped her away from us.
    I have a brother, the youngest of 11 children in my family who is psychizophenic and is perfectly fine as long as he's on his meds. Those meds have been a god send. I also have 5 cousins in another province of Canada that committed suicide.
    Now, here's the clincher mister, NONE of them were ever abused by their families and like my family, all their other children are perfectly healthy and happy and all were raised the same.
    Finally, isn't it strange that most of these individuals never (remember) sexual abuse by their families UNTIL it is PLANTED in their troubled minds.
    My son and daughter -in-law are very close to me and I truly look forward to maybe being blessed with another grandchild before I die. As a grandmother of a precious angel that has gone before me, and mother of a beautiful daughter my first born also gone, I pray that all troubled individuals get the true professional help they need with a competent (medical) no nonsense expert.
    One wouldn't dream of getting an unlicensed electrician and they are illigal, yet quacks have the right to mess with the delicate minds of often very troubled individuals and are never held accountable if they do harm! What a damn shame!
    Claudette

  • Posted By: choonzer @ 10/30/2007 8:01:33 PM

    My my, trevorg, you are indeed passionate about saving all the psychotherapy patients of the world from their treatment, which you have clearly indicated to be a fate worse than death itself. You question about why some people are able to cope with horrendous experiences while others stumble over relatively minor ones is exactly my point. People are vastly different in so many ways - genetics, nurturing, personality, intelligence, etc. etc. And thanks for your specific concern about my own patients - I'm concerned about them myself. In fact, I usually refer them for medication, and I always direct them forward in their thinking. There are a few folks who benefit from the "get over it" attitude you're touting, but here's a news flash for you - NOT EVERYONE RESPONDS TO THAT. In fact, people who are accustomed to being victimized and finally take the scary and proactive step of seeking therapy usually require a softer approach, one that goes at their own pace, at least initially. I know this seems to be an incredibly difficult concept for you to grasp, but here goes, once again. YOURS IS NOT THE ONLY VALID EXPERIENCE IN THE WORLD. I have seen hundreds of people benefit greatly from therapy, and all of your irrational spouting of venom to the contrary, there are millions of people besides the ones I've seen who will say the same. You just choose to believe otherwise. And unfortunately, you're so outspoken and rabid in your opinion that you may very well dissuade a few folks from getting the help they need.

  • Posted By: choonzer @ 10/30/2007 3:10:19 PM

    trevorg: Once again, you're suggesting that I and others on this site (the vast majority) who don't agree with you simply need to "do more research" until we arrive at your point of view. I'm sorry that you feel the many folks who have posted their own successes in DID treatment here are somehow "brainwashed", as you say. I can tell you definitively that the patients I've worked with to deal with their past abuse issues are not brainwashed at all, and many have graduated from therapy and would never describe the treatment they received as "useless." But again, their experiences were obviously different than yours. It's too bad you're so bitter you can't seem to allow for that. Incidentally, I'm a strong proponent of people using psychiatric medicine when appropriate (like for the diagnoses you named, among others), but I also feel like meds are becoming over-used because peope would rather pop a pill than do the work that effective psychotherapy requires.

    • Posted By: trevorg @ 10/30/2007 6:33:05 PM

      Hey Choonzer: Once again, you'd better do some more research before you go on blindly treating your clients in a negative or dangerous manner.
      Just as insulin can save the life of a diabetic, it is a proven fact that meds are extremely important for individuals suffering a huge array of (head) problems.
      Are you aware that it is now common practice that the brain of a suicide individual is sent to forensic study to see what their levels of certain brain chemicals or lack thereof is present?
      Chemistry, blood lines, brain injury and the least of which is invironmental causes brain disorders.
      You still haven't answered one of the most compelling questions that most up to date and logical (medical) experts question.
      How can someone suffer incredible and various kinds of abuse and suffering in a death camp and yet survive to live normal and fruitful lives (never) forgetting their abuses, but, in a positive manner putting such memories on the back burner and becoming (true) survivors? These incredible human beings simple know the answer "Life is a choice and anyone with a backbone and a half decent brain can choose not to wallow in mud."
      The "abuse excuse" is still alive and well, and there will always be those who feed on the feeble minded.
      When it comes to being a so called "Psychotherapist" my opinion is that anyone with very little education and not a schred of "medical" training can call themselves a Psychotherapist or a Counsellor and get way over their heads which could and has produced irreparable damage.
      I will be overjoyed when the last nail into the coffin of Psychotherapy has landed so people will choose to become stronger and get on with the business of living and living fruitfully! If they have serious mental problems, then let the really good mental health experts intervene with not only talk treatment, in a forward motion and the availability of the right meds they might desperately require.
      Has is ever occured to you that some who go for quack therapy, simply get bored, seem to be cured or better yet are just moving on?????????? Therapy was never meant to hurt or be long term!!!!!!!
      Respecfully: Claudette

  • Posted By: induced1 @ 10/30/2007 4:19:28 PM

    Iatrogenic (doctor or therapy-induced) DID and False Memories of SRA (or other horrific abreactions) is a clear and present danger - not to mention, high probability. Check all the facts. Ignorance is not bliss. Ignorance is lethal sometimes. Not studying both sides of this issue very carefully is beyond highly irresponsible and negligent. Refer to the the Oct. issue of Scientific American Mind - Brain Stains.

    • Posted By: erlaia @ 10/30/2007 5:20:37 PM

      The article in question, I note, rather studiously avoids a balanced exploration of the research that is out there on the complexities of displaced memories. Moreover, some of the clincial work referenced, such as that by Loftus, is questionable in its research protocols, the conflicting nature of her own findings, and thelimited size of her research pools. I note that Loftus, who seems now to make her living as an "expert witness' has had her "findings" successfully refuted in court, rather consistently in the most recent of "her" cases.

      While this is an admittedly challenging area to study, articles like that In SA Brain, confound the process of true dialogue by being utterly selective in their review of literature, frankly. I will concur that memory can be, in some suggestible folks, manipulated or created. However, the vast majority of skilled trauma therapists strive, rather for the opposite - to be meticulous in allowing the client to surface the material in a natural fashion. that eschews suggestion, hypnosis, "truth drugs' and all that crap. I woudl suggest that those forms of skewed intervention are far far less than such naieve articles proport. I would suggest that you do as you advocate, and conduct a serious review of the literature out there. Read Terr, explore the clinical findings of Kluft, of Fine, of Courtois, of Putnam... and then reread tacky articles published in a magazine that is the scientific equivalent of People mag.....

    • Posted By: erlaia @ 10/30/2007 5:09:11 PM

      There are, sadly, some therapists out there who focus on techniques that can alter internalized memories. However, I would note that the concept of "false memory syndrome" is the creation of, not clinicians, but folks who had a daughter who noted that she was sexually abused as a child....that daughter is now a well-known clinician, I note, while the parents, who flash their doctoral degrees as part of their foundation, are both educated in fields far, far from psychology . I would suggest that a foundation that had to invite one of its founding board members to leave following his rather public support of NAMBLA suggests where their real "heart" lives...... Their foundatiion is notable for the lack of functional research it sponsors, and has essentially become a promotional arm for a specific rather narrow concern. Furthermore, it has become a crying post for parents whose children no longer choose to associate with them.

      if you bother to explore the considered work of others, you might choose to explore Terr's substantive work on the subject, which notes that "created memory" tends to, in the reprocessing of the memory, lack profound affect, probably because the individual is recounting a story, not a memory. Displaced memory, when it emerges, characteristically flushses forward with profound affect.

      While incompetent therapists abound, I would suggest that creating true dissociative identity where none existed suggests a personality rife with other issues, including a high level of suggestibility and suggests a therapist that is not incompetent, but malignant, a far more difficult circumstance to locate.... Your presumption of the "high probability" of clinical creation of DID and of SRA memories is naieve at best and must, I suspect, reflect some compelling desire to avoid a topic of substantive pain.

      Trust me, I have far better things to do with my spare time than invent memories of childhood torture, and I have far better ways that I might like to spend discretionary income rather than on the kind of skilled therapy of a length and duration that insurers will simply not cover.

  • Posted By: induced1 @ 10/30/2007 4:17:09 PM

    Iatrogenic (doctor or therapy-induced) DID and False Memories of SRA (or other horrific abreactions) is a clear and present danger - not to mention, high probability. Check all the facts. Ignorance is not bliss. Ignorance is lethal sometimes. Not studying both sides of this issue very carefully is beyond highly irresponsible and negligent. Refer to the the Oct. issue of Scientific American Mind - Brain Stains.

  • Posted By: rainstormangel @ 10/30/2007 3:04:27 PM

    erlaia,
    Wishing you the best. I did not see that statement you referred to. It causes revulsion, and is a metaphor I wish would be done away with. Anyone who has been "washed in the blood" knows it does nothing to heighten one's spirituality. And all the songs that speak to this in the Christian church--wow. My pastor has been very sensitive to this and other allusions, considering even changing some of the "decoration" at the kneeling rail. Where I live is a hot spot for known abuses of the nature you and I survived.

    I agree wholeheartedly that one's spirituality is a process, a journey.

    I wish you well.

  • Posted By: Rosie a whetstone @ 10/30/2007 2:09:43 PM

    I have the utmost empathy and respect for both the therapist and Karen. A terrifying road to travel, in my work a a psychotherapist I am challenged by a client with MPD, and am commited to supporting her throught the journey that will hopefully end up with her becoming complete. Rosie Whetstone

    • Posted By: erlaia @ 10/30/2007 2:15:15 PM

      my therapist and I are "overlaying the "internal family systems" model on top of my "classic" presenting DID. that model normalizes dissociation, and establishes a basis for dialogue between the core self and the various parts in distress. It has been a profound model for me, I note. Schwart's model is getting some traction in clinical trauma circles as it provides an empowerment for the client to self-dialogue in ways that focus on conflict resolution. And, after all, it is the conflict that is the issue, not the number of parts that happen to be up.

      I am sure your sincerity and focus will be invaluable with your client.

  • Posted By: Rosie whetstone @ 10/30/2007 2:06:35 PM

    I have the utmost empathy and respect for both the therapist and Karen. A terrifying road to travel, in my work a a psychotherapist I am challenged by a client with MPD, and am commited to supporting her throught the journey that will hopefully end up with her becoming complete. Rosie Whetstone

  • Posted By: choonzer @ 10/30/2007 1:24:33 PM

    To trevorg: It's interesting to me that even when someone reaches out to you sympathetically, you bite back. I can only imagine what experiences have caused such bitterness in you, but you would do well to remember one thing: everyone's experiences are different. The fact that you found a certain treatment approach unfruitful or even damaging does not mean that it is "gargbage," or that all others who subscribe to it are "brainwashed." It simply, regrettably, wasn't a good fit in your case. The same can be said for many medicines, which some people swear by and others detest. It's human nature to generalize our own experiences to be like everyone else's, but the mature mind eventually recognizes that, as they say, one person's trash is another's treasure. I have seen some people who were not benefitted at all by delving into their abusive pasts, and also many for whom that process was vastly useful and therapeutic, even necessary to their survival. I'm glad a more forward-thinking, cognitive-behavioral approach has worked out better for you, but don't assume it's a one-size-fits-all world out there, particularly when it comes to the complexities of healing the human psyche.

  • Posted By: trevorg @ 10/29/2007 9:10:09 PM

    To ThomasH: No you really don't understand me and what I've suffered, therefore, I will take your well wishes with a grain of salt. A world renowned psychiatrist, who did the forensic study on my daughter's/grandaughter's death caused by malpractice and criminal negligance, still cannot understand just how sane and strong I have been and continue to be in my fight for proper care of the mentally ill. That is also the consensus of a wonderful psychologist who practices cognitive therapy instead of all this bogus and dangerous ( let's' treat your mind like a closed suitcase and open it up to my greedy/filthy /money making thoughts scenerios). Only monetary and wacked out charlitons would torture clients in this manner. There are so many on this chat that are so brainwashed and mentally ill that I've given up.
    So, don't get sanctimonious with me, whether it's what one of you or a multitude of (you) consider the least worthwhile.
    What garbage and dangerous at that!
    Claudette

    • Posted By: ThomasH @ 10/30/2007 12:57:52 PM

      Very true that I cannot know the depth of your pain. However, I wish for you that you could accept concern instead of having to challenge back. I don't think your strength is in your anger but in the wisdom and discovery of truth that few actually discover because they have not walked or been drug through the path you have had to endure. And I believe some of us would listen more closely to your perspective if you didn't have to attack. Even though every one of us is limited to our experience and current understanding, it seems to me that most on this site are eager to learn. Instead of just attacking our current efforts, what can you share that has been helpful?

  • Posted By: rainstormangel @ 10/29/2007 8:15:02 PM

    erlaia, I hope none of my replies increased your pain. I've had difficulties getting items to post, but I know I have spoken of personal salvation and such. I REALLY feel as if I'm stepping out here. erlaia, you're not alone in the experience you described. This part of the abuse I (?) endured, as well as other parts, unmentioned, have definitely made organized religion difficult, as well as many things people say who like to take the way of the "pat answer," or who like to spiritualize everything (DID is demonic, just forgive, or other things), including that which I need to do to become well. Just the same, I realize I am a physical, spiritual, and emotional being. I have likened some of the things said here to "spiritual abuse," and it is, but I spoke also of its adding to woundedness (hinting that I had suffered much "worse" spiritual abuses). erlaia, you deserve whatever you need to heal, expensive therapist(s) included. Sometimes you get what you pay for, and the therapist who helped me the most was NOT at the local mental health center and doesn't accept sliding fee scales. He knows what he is doing. He also is not in it for the money or to keep me in therapy.
    erlaia, it is possible to have been abused . . . brutalized . . . tortured . . . in such ways and have spirituality, even "salvation" be part of the healing, BUT, I DO "understand," only insofar as I know I can never fully understand what you have been through (what you've been through and that this may close to impossible). I believe that those who have truly been through ritualized, cultic, or cult-like abuse, or other horrific things come out of it with the knowledge of one thing: people may empathize, may try to understand, but EVERY person's experience is different. Our paths to healing may be very different, or very similar, the same as our actual experiences.
    erlaia, you are the only other person I've "met" that has admitted to that particular horror.
    The smell.
    The . . . trying to get it off.
    Take care of you. This may be a difficult week for you.
    I need to go take care of myself right now. I don't speak of this. People are slow enough to believe in non-iatrogenic DID. They are even slower to believe in RSA, RA, or CA.
    I SO hope I wasn't one that increased your pain.

    • Posted By: erlaia @ 10/30/2007 8:53:34 AM

      Exploring spirituality as part of one's life is one thing. I do react strongly to simplistic theologic solutions, frankly, and folks who reference being "washed in the blood of the lamb", as the one poster did, clearly have no understanding of the literal content of that language. That kind of theologic obtuseness annoys the heck out of me, as it betrays a signal lack of understanding of their own words! For me, finding a spiritual path is intensely personal and required great internal patience as I work with my inner community. I can, and do, accept the value of a spiritual journey. I don't accept pat answers of instantaenous "salvation" as being the ideal solution for processing deeply repressed affect related to diabolic abuse. So, no, your posts do not upset me, as they indicate an awareness of a personal journey, not a blanket assumption of effectiveness of a singular simplistic theologic solution.

  • Posted By: ThomasH @ 10/29/2007 7:08:39 PM

    To trevorg: I don't know if you are really gone, but thank you for finally sharing the source of some of your pain. I am sorry for your loss and I can only assume you had the direct experience that the "helping" profession fell way short of helping your daughter and her pain. I do wish you peace and hope you discover a path that has much more quiet and hope.

  • Posted By: phiomalibu @ 10/23/2007 3:47:16 AM

    Fantasitic News, I'm fascinated by this . Ireally wonder if hypnosis was used. What do you think?

    If you are looking for halloween costumes to suit your multiple personalities go to HALLOWEEN-COSTUMES.NET

    • Posted By: erlaia @ 10/29/2007 5:18:16 PM

      Enter Your Comment No. Hypnosis has value in selected components of therapy. Howwever, no self-respecting trauma therapist would rely on hypnosis to flush out memory content. And, as for haloween costumes, I suggest you go as yourself - a crashing boor

  • Posted By: Petr Pokorny @ 10/23/2007 4:57:36 AM

    i am writing you from the middle of Middle Europe, from the Czech Republic. We often come to deal with people with psychic disorders, DID included. I agree long term treatment is essential, seeing experts necessary. But first of all, I??d like to turn your attention to the ultimate source of mental health. It??s peace with God through Jesus Christ, the cleansing of all sins through the blood of the Lord. That??s where you first come to real peace, that??s where you come to be delivered from the curse of sin and healed from your disorders of mind and soul. You know how expensive it is to consult psychoterapists. The Lord is so gracious and loving that He saves you and heals you for free. Trust in Him for everything. Petr Pokorny

    • Posted By: erlaia @ 10/29/2007 5:16:41 PM

      Um, given the blood I was washed in in bizarre ritualized rites as part of my sexual abuse, I'll take the expensive therapists, thank you very much! In fact, much of the language you speak to in your posting speaks to the utterly pagan, ritualized nature of some aspects of the some organzed religions...... that can serve as a devolved base for cultish behaviors. For those who were abused in ritualized or cult like settings, yoru pat answer of personal salvation betrays an amaazing capacity for signal lack of understanding.

  • Posted By: norm14104 @ 10/23/2007 5:14:23 AM

    I have been diagnosed as D.I.D. ! What is the diference between that and M.P.D?

    • Posted By: erlaia @ 10/29/2007 5:11:39 PM

      Enter Your Comment The difference lies in the age of the semantics. Multiple Personality Disorder was the favored term until about ten or twelve years ago, when it was repaced with Dissociative identity Disorder as a slightly less charged, more cogent clinical definition.

    • Posted By: AD21 @ 10/25/2007 2:11:47 PM

      Best of luck on your journey. Things might get more intense for a while, but in the end, we think its's definitely worth it. Ours is!

      • Posted By: trevorg @ 10/26/2007 12:02:48 AM

        Good Luck all of you, however many there are! Guess you all could have a hell of a party without the cost eh? Wackos!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • Posted By: rainstormangel @ 10/23/2007 9:24:54 AM

      DID is essentially the disorder formerly known as MPD. The name of the diagnosis was changed to more accurately reflect the experience of the people who have said condition. Furthermore, there is some evidence to support that it was done in order to distance itself from the sensationalism of some of the most "severe" cases.
      DID, and dissociation, exist on a continuum from the not so uncommon experiences of road hypnosis, or getting lost in a book, movie, or tv show, so absorbed the person is that they fail to respond to their environment, say, having one's name called and just not hearing it to the less common experiences of losing time, being able to block out pain and other stimulus, and the development of one or more identities that have a stable set of characteristics and manner of interacting with the world, or certain situations, that indicates not just an absence or loss of time and/or sensation, but the replacement of that time and/or sensation with an "alternate," separately functioning identity.

      • Posted By: jasminerose @ 10/24/2007 9:12:20 PM

        rainstormangel, I agree that DID more accurately identifies the disorder as a dissociative disorder rather than a personality disorder. However, the description is pretty much the same in most cases. Furthermore, I don't think there is a simple answer so I always encourage someone asking a question to seek their own answers and do there own research because there is simply no simple response even in the DSM.

    • Posted By: jasminerose @ 10/23/2007 5:45:22 AM

      LOL, What, you want us to do your homework for you? Keep reading ....and grow into yourself ...

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse