I fail to comprehend why his wardrobe is important enough to lead this article. And I absolutely love the way you stray from Paul, who is presumably supposed to be the focus of the article, for an entire paragraph and then say "oh, right, and 5%." It would be nice to get a clear opinion, also. You mock and criticize him, and then seem to drift back to a positive note, only to end in uncertainty. Get your own views together before attempting to write a valid article about the man who may be America's last hope.









Discuss