'This Is Not a Bluff'

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: janorman @ 10/23/2007 5:40:57 PM

    A comment on mormonism. Actually the majority of the Christian religions (Catholic, Baptist, Lutheran, Methodist, Episcopalian, etc.) no long recognize the Mormon church as a Christian organization but as a cult.

    • Posted By: bjperry @ 10/23/2007 5:47:20 PM

      I think you're right

      The reason many protestants do not believe LDS are Christian is because LDS do not believe in the same Christ protestants believe in. LDS believe that Christ and Satan are brothers. Since Protestants believe that Christ is part of the Godhead, Satan too would have to be part of the Godhead if he were Christ's brother. Additionally LDS do not believe in the same God protestants believe in. LDS believe God was once a man as we are, who was selected to become a god by the council of gods. This stands in stark contradiction to what protestants believe about the nature of God; He has always been God and always will be God. Additionally, LDS believe we can become gods someday just as their god, who was once a man, became God long ago. This too stands in stark contrast to what protestants believe and sounds vaguely like what Satan promised Adam and Eve in the garden, "Eat the fruit and you shall become as gods".

      There are many reasons for protestants to claim that LDS are not Christian in the sense that protestants are Christian; these are a just a few. That they call themselves The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints makes no difference just as me calling myself a doctor wouldn't make it so.

      • Posted By: pinkpanther87413 @ 10/23/2007 5:52:54 PM

        so your saying Christians do not believe in Satan, where there is light there is dark where there is white there is black where there is cols there is warmth so if there is a Gad then there is a Devil simple facts of life!

        • Posted By: bjperry @ 10/23/2007 5:58:24 PM

          Protestants believe in Satan. The distinction I make is that protestants don't believe Satan and Christ are brothers as the LDS doctrine teaches. Protestants believe God, Christ and Holy Spirit are a trinity and have always existed. Whereas Satan, who was once an angel, was created by God. LDS believe that both Christ and Satan were created by God and in fact are brothers. In fact they believe that both Christ and Satan volunteered to go to earth to be the redeemer for sinful man. That God sent Christ they believe angered Satan and caused him to rebel.

          Like I said, there are many difference between the two beliefs which explains why many protestants don't considerer LDS Christians.

  • Posted By: sick and tired @ 10/23/2007 5:58:05 PM

    All this right-wing religious fanaticsm is enough to make Christ want to become an Atheist let alone myself! These nuts are neither Christian or right! All they do is spew hate, intolerance, and exclusion and I certainly don't recall Christ condoning any of those actions. Jesus taught us to love, respect and embrace all fellow human beings even if their beliefs and lifestyles differed from our own. The right-wing so-called "Christiian" radicals are nothing more than a bunch of over zealous hypocrites who think Jesus walked around with an NRA membership card in his pocket, an American flag in one hand and a rifle in the other. GET YOUR HEADS OUT OF THE SAND AMONG OTHER PLACES PEOPLE!!!!! Pick up your BIBLES and read the facts and stop twisting and perverting Christianity to serve your own sick, twisted, and MIS-GUIDED views!!!!!

  • Posted By: awrsmith @ 10/23/2007 5:58:03 PM

    is socialized medicine an evil listed in the bible? I can imagine the context it would be in. 'Thou are not equal, and thou shall not put tax dollars towards a better health care system for all'....wow that's some foresight a few thousand years in the predicting.

  • Posted By: jthurm @ 10/23/2007 2:39:03 PM

    freethinker101: I hope to stand next to you on Judgement Day. You have no idea what you are talking about, you just spout hateful speach from your own ignorance. Take the time to learn something about the people you are referring to before you post such ignorant blather. The founding fathers were Christian and this country was founded on Christian principles while allowing others to practice what they believe. If you cannot accept that I would personally like to encourage you to abandon the USA. The country will be stronger without your ignorance polluting it.

    • Posted By: Auslander @ 10/23/2007 2:53:26 PM

      Washington, Franklin, Madison, Monroe, and Ethan Allen were not Christian. Thomas Paine was certainly not Christian, and neither was Jefferson --he even wrote his own version of the Bible!

      This would be a great triva question: Which one of the Founding Fathers was a Christian?!

      • Posted By: atruemoderate @ 10/23/2007 5:57:57 PM

        I know! I know! John Adams. Yep, folks, he was a Christian and even tried to make Christianity the official religion of the US. When he saw how much everyone else did not want that, he went along with it. I'm so very glad he relented.

    • Posted By: Frost845 @ 10/23/2007 4:17:25 PM

      The founding fathers were freemasons. Not bible-thumping do gooder, were right your wrong, evangelical doomsday, apocalypse now christian ***!

  • Posted By: Saltydog_0 @ 10/23/2007 3:47:55 PM

    As a liberal democrat I am very much in favor of a conservative christian third party. There could be no greater boon to my party's prospects. It's about time the religious right picked up their toys and went home. It is obvious that they are not willing to be part of a community that allows intellectual discourse, compromise or tolerance of differing viewpoints whatsoever. I hope their "my way or the highway" rigidity may finally be addressed. The American people as a whole will choose "the highway"; pack your bags and go. If you won't associate with people who don't follow your every directive, perhaps you should stay inside the confines of your exclusive clubhouse. It's high time our politicians quit pandering to the immature and ignorant minority simply because they scream the loudest. When a child screams "I want!! I want!!" and you give it what it desires in order to just make it shut up, you are encouraging more of the same in the future. Time for us to say NO.

    • Posted By: dumbledorepillowbiter @ 10/23/2007 3:53:34 PM

      POT! POT! You actually think liberals with their own live by our "non standard" or get the heck out is any less judgemental than your average right winger? You guys are just as biggoted, intolerant, and judgemental as the rest of society. You guys think you have the corner market on values and tolerance? I have seen very little tolerance or values from people who claim to respect the views and ideals of ALL people.
      Practice what you preach you far left kook.

      • Posted By: BooRadley @ 10/23/2007 5:55:37 PM

        Dumbledore was gay...(The author herself has said so) How does that sit with your Christian concepts?

      • Posted By: atruemoderate @ 10/23/2007 4:06:53 PM

        Oops, I forgot. Don't tell us that we say that you have to leave if you don't agree with us, just that you can not insist that we leave if we don't agree with you. Liberals don't care if you think or believe differently, just that you don't insist we all think like you or enact laws based on your religious beliefs that go counter to our beliefs. Don't misrepresent what a liberal is and then rail against it, it's nly railing against yourself while we watch in wonder at this clueless person.

      • Posted By: atruemoderate @ 10/23/2007 3:59:51 PM

        You're right, we are trying to force something on you. What is it? well, it's what you want to choose. We won't tell you what to choose . . . oh wait, that would require thinking for yourself. That MUST be a scary concept.

    • Posted By: atruemoderate @ 10/23/2007 3:54:59 PM

      Nicely put Saltydog_o. Couldn't agree more even though I'm not a liberal democrat. Not a republican, either. I prefer to think for myself.

  • Posted By: ASAID @ 10/23/2007 5:53:36 PM

    THE PROPLEM FOR GOP WILL FACE MANY VOTERS WILL BE LEAVING FOR THE GOP BECOUSE OF THESE EXTREME CHRISTIANS THAT WANT TO CHANGE THE GOP TO CHRISTIAN PARTY AND THEY ARE NO DIFFERENT THAN HAMAS OR MUSLIM EXTREME THAT BELEIVES SAME IDEA FOR EVANGELICAL LEADERS

  • Posted By: truthseeker1 @ 10/23/2007 2:50:13 PM

    Christianity is not evil. Don't view christianity based on misguided people who have killed abortionists. Look at Jesus Christ, who was nothing but love. How in your right mind, might I ask, can you say that "Religious people have got us into a war,"? If the Clinton administration had did something about terrorism in the first place, ie. the first attack on the WTC or did something other than slap Hussein on the wrist when he violated the agreement of the treaty and no longer allowed our weapon's inspectors in his country. And even if you are going to try and have the argument that Bush and his cronies joined the war for their personal gain, the fact remains that we needed to get in that country and make sure that there were no weopons of mass destruction. WAKE UP! These are the times we live in. We can not control terrorists. They are not going to stop no matter what and that has nothing to do with christianity. We are not trying to infringe on all of you. We have rights also though. God gave you free will, and we don't want to take that away from you. But it is our belief deep within our souls that there is a heaven and a hell and that each person will one day have to answer to God for their actions. So therefore we cannot go against our beliefs and compromise our faith and not try to reach out to the world with the truth. I am sorry that you see us as evil. We are human and make mistakes, we are nothing but sinners saved by grace.

    • Posted By: Just my 2 cents @ 10/23/2007 3:19:37 PM

      DING DING DING DING. Another one here who still believes that 911 was caused by IRAQ. Still drinking the Kool-Aid are you? It's time you got a latte and think for yourslef.

      • Posted By: atruemoderate @ 10/23/2007 5:52:44 PM

        And what has our contestant won? A years subscription to REALITY!!! A new concept magazine that introduces people to the fact that 9/11 was NOT caused by Saddam Hussein, the weapons of mass destruction were already gone as, as reported byt the inspectors themselves BEFORE the war and many other bits of real facts. Also, they win a trip back to our lovely studios in one year to see just what they have learned.

        (Wild applause)

  • Posted By: BrotherJames @ 10/23/2007 5:51:17 PM

    Enter Your Comment

  • Posted By: sexypoet @ 10/23/2007 4:30:31 PM

    I consider myself to be a Christian, and I applaud anyone who lives, and acts upon their beliefs. BUT, I cannot support ANY candidate who would try to FORCE THEIR RELIGIOUS BELIEFS upon others. Any candidate who would seek to establish laws, or bend current laws in a way which would force others to abide by their own religious beliefs has no business in our government. If one were to take a step back from the question at hand, and look around the world at other governments which take an active role in promoting one certain religious belief, one can see numerous examples of why this type of government has no place in our country. We are involved in a religious civil war in Iraq, in which several different factions of the Muslim religion believe that 'THEIR' particular beliefs should be followed by everyone in the country, and they strive to enact, and enforce laws that would punish anyone who does not believe as they do. More people have been killed throughout history over religious beliefs, and reasons than any other reason. In Iraq, their religious beliefs are more dear to them, than anything that freedom, or democracy has to offer. In fact, the freedoms that we enjoy in this country, are in direct opposition to what their religious beliefs tell them about how they should live their lives. Religious beliefs, and democratic government, HAVE to be found, discovered, or taken into one's heart by choice, and not be force. Only by seeking it themselves, can it mean enough, and impassion them enough to fight for it, themselves. Our govenrment has taken us into this war under false pretenses, and accusations, and we now find ourselves at a loss on how to get out of it, without leaving it worse than it is now. In my opinion, Iran is being pushed into developing nuclear weapons out of the fear that this country may choose to invade, or attack it without provocation, as we did in Iraq, and they know that our military power can easily defeat them, using conventional means. To them, the only thing that they feel can protect them from this happening, is to threaten the use of nuclear weapons should that happen. And why should they feel otherwise about being attacked? We have already shown them that we will do it, even if OUR intelligence is flawed, or wrong. Freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom to turn their backs upon centuries old rellgious beliefs is not something that they want their country to embrace. And neither do the people of this country. I don't mind a president that prays to God, asking for direction, but I DO NOT want a president trying to force his particular beliefs upon me, and my family, all in God's Name. And that includes appointing strict constructionist judges to enforce their beliefs upon us all.

    • Posted By: bluestar1 @ 10/23/2007 4:41:02 PM

      Then you really aren't a Christian. Otherwise you would only accept what the one, true God says. Our country has watered down the definition of "Christian." Scripture is very clear, and you must accept it to be in God's kingdom. You do, however, have a right to your opinion, which is everyone's right. Free will is an awesome benefit to being an American, praise God.

      • Posted By: atruemoderate @ 10/23/2007 4:57:11 PM

        Are you judging this person? Isn't there something in the Bible about God reserving judgement unto Him/Her/Itself? There you go with that 'one true God' thing. How do you know? Because the Bible says so. Well, who says the Bible is true? It says it's true right there in the Bible so it must be true since everything in the Bible is true . . . yada, yada, yada. This circular logic makes me dizzy! See my earlier post.

        • Posted By: bluestar1 @ 10/23/2007 5:49:52 PM

          You interpret ascertaining one's beliefs with "judging." Her words speak for themselves. The difference between those who believe in the inerrent Word of God and those who don't is faith. Yes, I have faith that all 66 books, written over 1500 years by 40 different authors, otherwise know as The Bible, are true. And for the faithless, there is yet more and more scientific proof that all the prophecies, geography and archeology in this compilation of books are totally true. When you understand that The Bible is not just one book, but 66, maybe then you'll understand that you can go to no library in the world and find 10 books, let alone 66, that write about the same subject but agree entirely. The faith required to NOT believe in The Bible is far greater than the faith to believe. God bless you and your family.

    • Posted By: bjperry @ 10/23/2007 5:23:17 PM

      Allow me to make a few counterpoints:
      1) You don???t want strict constructionist judges because they'll impose their beliefs on all of us. What exactly did the Blackmun court do exactly if it didn't impose its belief on all of us when it decided Roe v. Wade? These were liberal judges incidentally, not strict constructionists. Strict constructionists don't impose their beliefs on you, they impose the beliefs of the founders, as memorialized in the Constitution. This is as it should be under a constitutional democracy. If you're upset that a right is absent from the text of the Constitution you have a Constitutional solution; amend the Constitution. A judge???s role is to say what the law is, not what it should be. When judges begin interpreting the Constitution to fit their desired outcome in a particular case, then the rights the Constitution guarantees become subject to the vagaries and proclivities of those members of the court who compose the current majority. You should fear the liberal judge more because just as a liberal judge may find rights that you think are there, they may just as easily find enumerated rights absent. When this occurs no one has any security in their rights because just as rights can be given, they can be taken away.
      2) You claim that you don't want anyone forcing their religious beliefs upon you. I don't know exactly what this refers to but suspect it's s thinly veiled reference to abortion. If your claim is true than presumably you???re equally opposed to law that restricts you from stealing, raping, and murdering because these are arguably based on the Judeo-Christian philosophy as enumerated in the 10 Commandments, and thus, someone is forcing their religious beliefs upon you.
      3) You claim that religion has been responsible for more deaths throughout history than any other factor, yet you provide no source to backup your claim. Consider the millions of people killed at the hands of Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, and Kim. These weren't killed as a result of religion but instead by the anti-democratic, atheistic regimes over which each of these individuals presided. While many make the same claim as you concerning this point, unfortunately historic facts are not on your side.
      4) You claim Iran is justified in fearing an attack. On it's face I think that's correct, but it misses the point as to why they should fear. It's not as you say, because we've given them reason to by attacking Iraq without provocation, but because they seem to be developing nuclear weapons. I take issue with your premise that we attacked Iraq unprovoked. Even if it were true that our intelligence was wrong about weapons of mass destruction (a fact many including myself will not concede) your claim would require us to believe that the government knew its intelligence was wrong. The fact that virtually every other country reached the same conclusion as the US tends to undercut your argument on both fronts.

      Please reconsider.

      .

  • Posted By: pinkpanther87413 @ 10/23/2007 5:47:41 PM

    I prefere Edwards to Paul he has a good heart and great iseas for AMERICA, not for ruling the world on the backs of the poor.

  • Posted By: mikesmithcomic @ 10/23/2007 2:54:24 PM

    I wonder how many 'pro-life' evangelicals who voted for Bush on the abortion non-issue realize how many innocent people died as a result of their actions? Tens of thousands of Iraqi civilians, thousands of Americans. Maybe someday these voters will realize that they have been swallowing a baited hook every presidential election by people who cast out the abortion issue and then do absolutely nothing about it after they get into office.

    • Posted By: tcolman @ 10/23/2007 3:30:37 PM

      Hey, Mikesmithcomic
      Guess how many lives have been taken because of abortion?
      MILLIONS! Don't compare thousands to millions it makes you look bad.

      • Posted By: atruemoderate @ 10/23/2007 5:46:47 PM

        Umm, just where did you get that figure 'millions' from? Your a**? Better be able to back that one up if you're going to spout it.

      • Posted By: Hodgiemoto @ 10/23/2007 3:45:46 PM

        Great to be American and have that choice.

    • Posted By: tcolman @ 10/23/2007 3:36:58 PM

      Hey MIKESMITHCOMIC,
      Do you know how many innocent victims there have been because of Abortion?
      MILLIONS! Don't compare thousands to millions...it makes you look bad.

  • Posted By: jrhodes77 @ 10/23/2007 4:41:27 PM

    It's amazing all the posts saying Christians should stay out of politics, and that this isn't a Christian nation. It is obvious that these posters have never read the original 13 colonies state constitution's. All but a couple of states made it clear, that if you weren't Christian, you had no right serving in the government. This mindset helped form our Constitution. A Constitution designed and built, using Christian principles. We as a nation need to learn how to read, and think, without whole heartily swallowing the garbage that both liberals and conservatives try to feed us. This country was founded on Christian principles. Why is it so important to rewrite history? Thomas Jefferson is credited with the term "separation of church and state", yet this man allowed, and participated in church services in the Capitol Building the entire eight years of his presidency. Why don't we read about this? Because we are too busy rewritting history, to meet our current desires and fulfil our current lusts. We shall be accountable to no one, for we are the masters of our destiny.

    • Posted By: atruemoderate @ 10/23/2007 5:19:34 PM

      I find myself agreeing with most of your conclusions but flabbergasted at how you got there. I actualy decided to stop relying on what other people were telling me about our founding fathers and went out and researched them for myself. They most decidedly did not base the Constitution on just Christian principles. With the exception of John Adams, they were passionate about separating church and state. Remember, Jefferson came from a state that required a person in public office and abhorred it so uch that he worked tirelessly to expunge it from the state constitution. He was vilified so much by the Christian extremeists back then that his quote on his gravestone does not refer to the King of England, rather to the Christian religious leaders who hounded him for keeping religion out of government. Allowing/sponsoring or participating in religious activities does not prove that he was in faveor of religion being a part of government, just a part of a person's life. To say this was a country founded on Christian principles is a lie of omission. The founding fathers also used many philosophies throughout history that respected the individual over government, human rights and tolerance of those that think, look , act and believe differently than you. Stop spreading the lie that this is a Christian country founed solely on Christian ideals. It's one thing for people to think you're uninformed, but quite another to open your mouth and prove it.

      • Posted By: jrhodes77 @ 10/23/2007 5:45:06 PM

        Ouch. I don't deny that several philosophys were used in developing our form of government. Why is it necessary to minimize the Christian influence? When jefferson was over the senate as vp, the first business brought before him was the use of the Capitol Building for church services. He could have nixed it, he didn't. If he was so against church and state, why have services in a federal building. Maybe, because he saw nothing wrong with it. He signed his documents as president, In the year of our Lord. Why? Jefferson was far from being being an evangelical Christian, yet he didn't hinder people expressing their religious views in government. He didn't want the government run by a church, but he understood that people of faith have a place in determining the affairs of state. I for one just want a voice. You give your views, with your reasoning, and I'll give mine, and let the chips fall where the may. Everyone operates by a belief system, and it can't be ignored when making decisions. (in gov. or out) If you don't like my views, then vote against me, but don't tell me I can't have a voice.

    • Posted By: pinkpanther87413 @ 10/23/2007 5:06:10 PM

      History is always written by the victor and written or aproved by the dictator in charge!!!

  • Posted By: mbleedom @ 10/23/2007 4:57:45 PM

    ...the Party of the Lunatic Fringe...you go, guys!

    • Posted By: jreb @ 10/23/2007 5:44:16 PM

      The lunatic fringe is the Democratic Party. You support abortion(baby murder, sodomites, radicat leftists, socialized medicine, complete control of my thought processes ,if I don't agree with you. The liberal bloggers spew out their HATE on almost every blog. Just notice their HATE, in almost any blog on the net. Feel the superiority, they think they have in any blog. .

  • Posted By: jmreyesiii @ 10/23/2007 5:43:34 PM

    Those who seem to have such hatred for religion seem to be the ones that preach "tolerance." Let's take a look at today's definition of "tolerance" - the notion that you HAVE TO BELIEVE everyone is right or you're called names including, but not limited to, bigot, homophobe, wacko, dictator, Taliban, or extremist. Now, does that really make sense? Therefore if a Christian is accused of FORCING his or her beliefs on others that person is branded intolerant. In order not to be branded intolerant, he or she MUST believe that everyone HAS TO BELIEVE everyone is right. Christians are accused by tolerant-supporters of being intolerant, yet they are being intolerant of Christians. What a mixed up world we live in.

  • Posted By: noland59 @ 10/23/2007 5:38:46 PM

    I'm a conservative Democrat-pro life against Gay marriage I like many Democrats are having a hard time with
    another Clinton and for sure no more bush.
    From the heartland pettis county Missouri
    bill noland

  • Posted By: erchess @ 10/23/2007 5:36:55 PM

    There are many Americans who view abortion the way virtually all of us view slavery today. We understand why many voters in the 1800s could not vote for candidates who waffled on slavery. We understand why slaves and their suppporters sometimes killed in an attempt to end slavery and even more frequently broke the law by trying to escape or by aiding slaves in escapes. Similarly, many among us believe that abortion is homicide and as such should only be legal when several doctors agree that without the abortion either another baby in the womb or the the mother herself will die. Certainly no such person would vote for any Democrat but if the Republicans should nominate someone who does not pass the litmust test a true believer might well take actions that would result in the election of the Democrat. Then again the true believer might figure that on abortion half a loaf is better than none or he might be swayed by other issues to vote for the Rebpublican whose view of abortion is less than pleasing. I personally will not vote for Guliani for President.

  • Posted By: viji @ 10/23/2007 4:13:13 PM

    "I cannot vote for someone who believes that it's all right to stop a beating heart."

    Interesting quote given that these people support the war and the death penalty.

    • Posted By: hair @ 10/23/2007 4:23:55 PM

      May I ask, who then did you vote for in 2004? Bush? Even by that time a mass murder!!!

      • Posted By: viji @ 10/23/2007 5:34:46 PM

        I think you misunderstood me. I was pulling a quote from the article and commenting on the irony (hypocrisy).

  • Posted By: fish @ 10/23/2007 5:29:57 PM

    The problem for Christians is wasted votes. If Jesus ran for president, he would lose the election in a landslide if it were based on issues and values. He was too extreme 2000 years ago, and far too extreme today. For a Christian, voting for Jesus would be a wasted vote in US politics -- unless it caused one party to move toward biblical values. That's why they'll abstain if they can't find a candidate they can stand behind. Democrats will win this one as a result.

  • Posted By: powmadeak47 @ 10/23/2007 5:29:51 PM

    So what does this 'pro-lifer' think of the death of thousands of Iraq civilians in a bogus war that is supported by all GOP candidates?

  • Posted By: signedbyjustme @ 10/23/2007 5:29:15 PM

    Sorry about the second post..

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse