Avoiding Another Katrina

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: iraqis911#2 @ 10/24/2007 4:02:34 PM

    the president cut and run from new orleans. he needs a trillion dollars to waste on this useless war

  • Posted By: diehljg @ 10/24/2007 2:10:28 PM

    Truly another tragedy of major proportions. In numerous and various places, our homes, loved ones, health, economy, livelihoods, education, identities, food supply, environment, constituitional freedoms, infrastructure, etc. are literally burning, drying up, flooding, being stolen, sacrificed, sold off, exported, compromised, poisoned, subcontractred, extorted, embezzled, melting, disintegrating, etc, and we have none to blame but ourselves and our gutless national leaders, who have this country hopelessly mired in an immoral and illegal war that has distracted our attention and resources away from matters of real importance, and severely compromised our ability to address more important, fundamental issues. I expect alot more from our government - don't you?

    • Posted By: kennethx @ 10/24/2007 3:35:50 PM

      I was born and raised in Escondido, Ca.. My former home and property was destroyed by the recent fires along with many of the homes of our neighbors and friends. The response by the local and state governments are what the people of San Diego expect from their leaders. More than enough help is available and would be available even if the Feds did nothing. You see, the majority of people in southern Cal take responsibility for themselves and do not wait for the Feds to take action. When the people were told to evacuate, all but a very few evacuated. When they showed up at evacuation spots, chuches, local businesses and private individuals were the primary source of help to those in need. Yes, the state helped, but the local citizens took on the responsibility to care for their own.

      Lets look at the differences between this disaster and Katrina. In So Cal the people did not wait to act. The people in NO waited too long to act despite the mulitiple warnings from the feds to evacuate. The Mayor of San Diego pressed for evacuation. Mayor Nagin did nothing but point the finger of blame at president Bush. The people in San Diego rallied together and helped each other. The people of NO rioted and looted their own neighborhoods. The Murph ( better known to those outside San Diego as Qualcom) was almost festive. The Superdome was a filthy mess.

      Why is it that California is doing it right and Louisiana did it so wrong? New Orleans was a corrupt city run by a bunch of Liberals--San Diego and San Diego County is very conservative with very little corruption in comparison. The state of Louisiana was governed by a Democrat and though you cannot realy call Arnold a true conservative, he is a Republican and holds some very conservative ideals. Enough said.

      The difference between me and you is that I see government as the problem not the solution. These fires may have been prevented, somewhat, if the tree huggers had not held up, through lawsuits, the clearing of fallen and dead brush from the uninhabited areas in southern Cal. This dead and dried up brush and dead wood is, or was because it is cleared now, a tinder box waiting to be lit. The list of problems you write about do have one thing in common--they can all be attributed to Big Government. I resist big government whenever possible. You seem to want more of it.

      • Posted By: socalrinkrat @ 10/24/2007 3:50:57 PM

        Ah, Louisiana is a red state, California is a blue state.

  • Posted By: MICHAELATX @ 10/24/2007 3:48:00 PM

    It takes a high level of ignorance to compare Katrina to these fires. The infrastructure of southern California, including power, water, and communications, is still very much intact. We'll see how well California fares when an 8.0 or higher comes along--not that I'd wish that on anyone.

  • Posted By: kennethx @ 10/24/2007 3:47:40 PM

    I was born and raised in San Diego County and my former home and property were destroyed by the fire as well as the neighbors and friends I have known my whole life. The main difference between this tragedy and Katrina is that conservative San Diegans and their leadership did not sit on their hands and wait for the Feds to act before doing something. Simply, they helped themselves and took care of each other. New Orleans leadership just pointed the finger of blame and made it political despite having ample warning to evacuate. Now the Liberals are trying to make this disaster political as well--it is how they maintain their power.

  • Posted By: MICHAELATX @ 10/24/2007 3:45:31 PM

    I'm really enjoying the new and ever elevated levels of ignorance of those who compare these fires to Katrina in any way. The infrastructure of southern California is still intact. We'll see how they do after an 8.5 earthquake comes along. Shame on all of you who've engaged in this non-issue.

    S

  • Posted By: strokz @ 10/24/2007 3:44:42 PM

    Yes, even a child can understand that a flood is different than a fire. The issue is the level of assistance provided. There a people all over CA, like the world is about to end. The people in NO had to beg then and are still begging for assistance today. Did you read my point about the insurance?

  • Posted By: jtphillips @ 10/24/2007 3:35:34 PM

    TO dgu56: "Oh, come on. Flood or fire, the way to handle it is to get people out. New Orleans failed in this, San Diego didn't." Really? Be serious. Granted, different communities, different behaviours, different results. But still you have to acknowledge that standing on solid ground vs. standing in a quagmire is TOTALLY different. It's so "human nature" and predictable to immediately start ranting about how we are better than them. Yes, the government failed in many, many ways in NO. The Mayor was acting like a child. However, we would be seeing many more government failures in SD if the ground was saturated with floating debris and dead bodies. They're both horrific incidents, but I still say it's ridiculous to draw comparisons.

  • Posted By: strokz @ 10/24/2007 3:33:40 PM

    I think it's interesting that people in NO whose insurance companies won't honor flood damage have no recourse but Bush himself is providing help to those in CA with no policy at all.
    Get ready people... we don't know our history. This revolution will be televised. Get the blades and the baskets ready Marie!

  • Posted By: Westerly Northerner @ 10/24/2007 3:33:39 PM

    comment: as i read through your coments--you are very angry with New Orleans..or at least have nothing nice to say about them-a bad experience there?(no not asked as sarcastic---just inquiring) I was fortunate enough to get to know in both states, good hard-working folks who are living life. In both states I dealt with working class peoples---and in both states, it was these people who wanted better lives, and I didnt hear complaining from any of the people I was with. I am just glad that in Socal that people are getting out--theyre safe...I dont think either of us can imagine it unless we have been in it. And as an after thought here, maybe you are right about some of your points, but in the end, does it matter? What matters is help happens...in a timely way....so that everyone can begin to move forward to living their lives. We cannot prevent every disaster, but lessons can be learnt from past ones.

  • Posted By: TehKitty @ 10/24/2007 3:31:15 PM

    ...and yes, there is a certain amount of looting going on right here in southern Cali, at the burn sites. Humans are humans, no matter where the disaster occurs.

  • Posted By: TehKitty @ 10/24/2007 3:25:02 PM

    ssbn777 - what a specious, Troll's "argument." Interesting that in actuality, the poorer the person, the more likely they are to fight to preserve the few possessions they have. You can fight a fire - you can't fight a hurricane, nor a flood. A little thought prior to yammering would have saved you from appearing a doltish idiot...especially mentioning supposed incidents during Katrina's aftermath which turned out to be false. Tool.

  • Posted By: ssbn777 @ 10/24/2007 2:45:51 PM

    The government responses to these disasters have little or nothing to do with the outcomes. The difference lies in the people affected. In California, you have mostly working and educated people taking responsibility for themselves and helping each other and first responders as best as they can. In New Orleans, you had mostly lifetime and/or multi-generational welfare recipients, lazily waiting around for yet another bailout, quick to blame somebody else, raping and pillaging at first opportunity, and actually shooting at first responders sent to help them.

    • Posted By: Phenom08 @ 10/24/2007 3:18:12 PM

      You can't be serious. In this day and time you are not making sweeping judgements about people like that. Most of the people LEFT in NO were usually poor and undereducated or uneducated, this is true. Those that had the means, got out. Those who remained did not do so"lazily". They simply had no means. Yes, they were waiting for their governemnt to do as it should... help those who, for lack of education and money, cannot help themselves. And yes there was a criminal element there, but they were a small minority. It is sad that we live in a country where everything seems to always come down to a debate on race, but it is ignorant sweeping statements like yours that perpetuate this kind of discussion.

    • Posted By: warrior rabbit @ 10/24/2007 2:58:52 PM

      ssbn777, it's really not as clear cut as all that. In reality, aside from what I already posted below, it's an issue of metropolitan vs. rural. In California, public transportation is pretty much nonexistent, and restricted to the major metropolitan areas. I know many affluent, educated people who live downtown w/o transportation (because of the trolley and buses and shortage /cost of parking). Downtown (Gaslamp, up through Little Italy, pushing out toward East Village) is a thriving, highly populous, upscale area. Nonetheless, if downtown San Diego were a raging inferno, we would see another Katrina-like response.

      Instead, the backcountry is on fire. In the suburban/rural areas, you don't live there w/o transportation because there's no public transportation. People are self-reliant out there because they have to be. They can flee, and they have somewhere to go (downtown).

  • Posted By: cruzinKali @ 10/24/2007 3:17:08 PM

    This isn't California's first major disaster and Californians always pull together in time of need, helping each other out no matter what your "background/race" is. I remember the 1989 Lome Prieta earthquake, no looting occurred, neighbors poured out to help save others out of the rubble. California has many different disasters that occur and so the state is always going through training to be ready as it may hit at any moment.

  • Posted By: gdirtsa @ 10/24/2007 3:12:00 PM

    TO ssbn777: That is a low-blow and ill spoken for you to say. The truth is the local and national governments have learned from Katrina and Rita and had disaster plans restructured to avoid similar results. Would you happen to know that majority of New Orleanians are blue-collar workers? Have you even been to New Orleans and met the people? They are no different in helping out their neighbors and each other as Californians are. Oh and guess what?? Most New Orleanians had emergency food and water during huricane season. It was that there was NO response from the local and national govenerments after 3 days, whereas I see that the California fire victims received asisstance (shelter, FEMA money, etc) within 3 days. And you telling us the government response didn't make a difference?

  • Posted By: dgu56 @ 10/24/2007 3:10:05 PM

    No, SoCal does NOT have a fatalistic attitude towards earthquakes. Building codes are updated all the time to increase protection gainst them, engineers here at UCSD have an earthquake testing lab that is huge so that they can better attack the problem, and in the last few years CA spent billions retrofitting bridges and highways to increase earthquake resistance. The attitude out here is to try and make things better. When I lived in New Orleans the people there always complained about not getting enough "help."

  • Posted By: San Diegan @ 10/24/2007 3:07:09 PM

    I live in San Diego. Luckily my home is not in any danger but I have family and friends who have been evacuated and do not yet know the fate of their homes. I also flew to New Orleans a few days after Katrina to deliver supplies and to transport hurrican victims to Texas and California. I would not wish either of these disasters on anyone. People rose to the challenge to meet the immediate threat during Katrina and people are rising to the challenge here. Sure, things go wrong and fingers can be pointed, but in times such as these it is amazing to watch the determination, brotherhood and humanity we Americans have to offer.

  • Posted By: Westerly Northerner @ 10/24/2007 3:04:29 PM

    Comment:"When I lived in New Orleans, I noted people there have a fatalistic attitude about hurricanes. It is what it is. Out here there's a fighting attitude. More of a get'er done attitude." Doesnt not Socal have same with earthquakes? I too have had opportunity to live in both places---yes two very different worlds....in the same country. Does that mean one is less than another? Or should it be---we help all our brothers and sisters, friends and neighbors---because we are all Americans...together?

  • Posted By: dgu56 @ 10/24/2007 3:02:28 PM

    MillerM84, please stop excusing bad behaviour on poverty. Listening to you make apologies about the looting and stealing and leaving old people to die in New Orleans because these "poor" people were losing everything is sickening. Character is not based on money. Never was, never has been. Like I've pointed out several times, the New Orleans cops, a third of them anyway, deserted their jobs and some even joined the looting.

  • Posted By: dgu56 @ 10/24/2007 2:57:21 PM

    Oh, come on. Flood or fire, the way to handle it is to get people out. New Orleans failed in this, San Diego didn't. If San Diego left the people in harm's way you'd have every bit the loss of life that New Orleans had. And as far as the number of hurricanes coming through New Orleans, they have a hurricane SEASON there. Every single year they are at risk of a hurricane. There was NO excuse not to be prepared.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse