Photo (right): law.wayne.edu
Controversial: The book against coed combat, author Browne

The Case Against Women in Combat

The author of a new book contends that women shouldn't be in the front lines.

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

Kingsley Browne, law professor at Wayne State University in Michigan, is used to being called a male chauvinist. In a previous book he argued that biological differences between the sexes—rather than injustice—explain the existence of the glass ceiling. His new book, "Co-Ed Combat: The New Evidence That Women Shouldn't Fight the Nation's Wars," due out Nov. 8, argues that women are not physically and psychologically suited for combat. His contention: their presence on the front lines even endangers the military itself. Browne explained his views to NEWSWEEK's Martha Brant. Excerpts:

NEWSWEEK: Women fly missions and serve on warships, but they aren't yet in the infantry. Is there really any possibility that women will fight alongside ground troops?
Kingsley Browne: It's an issue that could be substantially affected by the 2008 presidential election. It has come up in the Democratic debates, and the candidates expressed doubts about excluding women from any military positions.

If you talk to the military brass, they are always very supportive of women in their ranks.
For the last couple of decades one doesn't advance very far up the ladder without demonstrating a clear commitment to the advancement of women. There are a lot of military people who think women in combat is a horrible idea, but it's career suicide to say it. Many think they shouldn't be on warships or flying combat missions.

You go one step further and argue that women shouldn't be part of forward-deployed support units.
Today the Department of Defense policy excludes women from being embedded within the infantry, but that policy is being routinely violated. There are many tasks that women perform in Iraq and Afghanistan where the enemy is trying to attack them. When the shooting starts, you can't count on just being able to do your assigned task. If your supply unit gets hit, you have to engage the enemy. Your job might be a cook, but suddenly someone's life depends on your being able to drag them out of the line of fire.

But today's military is just as much about brains as brawn.
Brawn clearly still matters. Soldiers today are often carrying at least 60 pounds of gear. That doesn't even include food, water, batteries. That's huge. Remember the EP3 spy plane that got shot down over China? The pilot weighed 220 pounds. He said it took every ounce of his strength just to keep the plane steady.

Women aren't generally as physically strong as men. What about psychologically?
Women are suffering post-traumatic stress disorder at higher rates than men. We know that women in general feel more negative emotional consequences from physical aggression. Surveys show that women in the military, especially enlisted women, don't want to go into combat. The percentage of women enlistees is going down, and that seems to be tied to their exposure to combat.

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Al Gore's Climate-Change Evolution
Al Gore's Climate-Change Evolution

Using emotion to convince people to change.

Heaven Can Wait
Heaven Can Wait

A new book promises proof of eternal life.

The World's Biggest Foods
The World's Biggest Foods

Monster edibles from around America.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: masanf @ 10/09/2009 2:04:36 AM

    Yeah, woman can be in combat as soon as they can score the same as the men during basic training. And since that is never going to happen. Everyone who has ever been in the miltary, and even those who haven't, know that every single test of physical prowess employed by the military is graded differntly for men than it is women Why? Because they quite simply can't do what the men do. It is that simple The notion that women should by placed in combat where people could be killed when they can't even pull their own weight during basic traiining is a pathetic joke. THere are bioligical differences between men and women that simply preclude their participation in combat. Pointing that out is not chauvinistic, it is merely stating a FACT that cannot be argued away by feminists. I was in the military for several years, and based uipon my experiences, I sure as heck wouldn't want my life to depend on a woman if we are both on the front lines.

    And the comment by the woman above makes my point and the point of the subject of this piece. "Yes, physically we may not be as strong as men true..." Exactly. Being strong in the "I am woman, hear me roar" sense is absolutely meaningless in a combat situation.

  • Posted By: BD11won @ 03/19/2009 10:18:13 PM

    I think women definitely can be in the army. I mean, the infantry division might not be the best...although i do know some girls who can beat up most dudes...

  • Posted By: blob @ 03/04/2009 7:40:55 PM

    As a woman I have to say I find this comment very offending. Yes, physically we may not be as strong as men true, but we can be just as strong if not stronger. And, we can be just as fierce as any man. I also want to point out that scientist have proven that the female body needs fat to have a period. It has also been shown that high stress jobs can also stop a women's period. Plus have you ever heard of testosterone? Women are not the only people who deal with hormones. Men and women both talk about their problems none stop, so you can't say that women complain more then men. Why can't women fight for a country that they love? We are in the 21st century but men still act like they did in the 19th. Stop acting like women are fragile porcelain dolls that are going to break if you touch them. Come on people, do you really want to see your sons on the front line fighting with women from other countries will rape, sodomize, and torture them? Should men be able to serve in support roles? Of course. Do they belong on the front lines with us animals? NO!!!!

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now