Technology

Facebook-ing Philanthropy

A viral application on the popular social networking site hints at the future of giving.

Cause and Effective: Tapping into the latent viral power of social networks for good
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

Eric Ding had grown frustrated with the toll that stagnant federal grant money was taking on his department. So at the end of May, the 24-year-old doctoral candidate in public health did something unorthodox: hat in hand, he logged onto Facebook. Ding, who conducts research at Harvard's Brigham and Women's Hospital, used the popular networking site's "Causes" feature and created the  group Support the Campaign for Breast Cancer Research. At first, Ding's group was drawing several thousand of the site's estimated 50 million active users. "Then it was 50,000 a day," recalls Ding. Today he's got more than 2.2 million subscribers. "Within the span of six months, we've created a critical mass of supporters," says Ding. "It's just amazing."


Facebook may be awash in for-profit cash right now—after all, Microsoft just paid $240 million for less than 2 percent of the company last week. But it's also quietly at the fore of a revolution in charitable giving. On May 24, CEO Mark Zuckerberg began allowing third-party developers to build custom "applications" for the site. Since then, some 6,000 applications have been built to enhance the user experience on Facebook. Many of the most popular new apps help friends have fun: you can play Scrabulous with your buds, buy them a virtual beer, broadcast your local weather forecast. A few, like Change.org, ChipIn and Firstgiving, help you change the real world. But Causes provides the best example of the power, reach and potential of Facebook.

Launched by Sean Parker (founding Facebook president, a Zuckerberg pal, and partner in the Founders Fund, which owns a stake in Facebook) and Joe Green, the application allows Facebook users to tap into the latent viral power of their social networks for good causes. When a Facebook member joins the Save Darfur Coalition cause, for example, everyone in his network is alerted of his interest. Same for when he recruits another member to join or donates money to the cause. It's a kind of altruistic peer pressure. "We're putting tools into the hands of individuals to mobilize their friends and ultimately build social and political movements," says Parker, 27, who had a hand in launching Napster, the once-cool music-sharing site, and Plaxo, the viral address-book service.

Since the Causes application launched, 27,000 Facebook Causes have been created to benefit 12,000 pre-existing nonprofit organizations, charities, relief groups, churches and political parties. "The Facebook generation wears their causes like the way they wear their favorite fashion," says Tom Watson, publisher of onPhilanthropy.com. It's a statement of who they are, he says.

It's certainly not about raising huge amounts of money, at least not yet. The Support the Campaign for Breast Cancer Research cause has raised barely two cents from each of its 2 million subscribers; the Save Darfur Coalition cause, which has more than 600,000 members, has raised barely $45,000. But that may be beside the point, say those who have launched causes on Facebook. "We wouldn't necessarily gauge someone's value to the advocacy movement based on what they've given," says Save Darfur's Allyn Brooks-LaSure. "This is a powerful mechanism to engage this critical population. They inform their community, attend events, volunteer. It's not something you can measure by looking at a ledger." Even if you've given a pittance to Save Darfur on Facebook, your whole network gets pinged, perhaps making them aware of a cause that they may not have been exposed to otherwise.

Social networks like Facebook that closely resemble users' off-line social life could shake up philanthropy. Even if large organizations don't immediately launch a cause on their own, any Facebook member can start one on its behalf. There have so far been 77 causes launched for UNICEF alone, raising some $11,000 for the fund. "We think it's great that our friends and supporters have done this on their own on our behalf," says spokeswoman Kristi Burnham.

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Al Gore's Climate-Change Evolution
Al Gore's Climate-Change Evolution

Using emotion to convince people to change.

Heaven Can Wait
Heaven Can Wait

A new book promises proof of eternal life.

The World's Biggest Foods
The World's Biggest Foods

Monster edibles from around America.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: samieschotz @ 11/03/2008 1:27:58 PM

    Thank you for your excellent post on Facebook and its connection to philanthropy with the application added called, ???Causes???. I found it very helpful that you started off your post explaining how many different organizations have entered the virtual world of giving such as Breast Cancer and Darfur. As an avid user of Facebook it did shock me that he Breast Cancer Research ???cause??? has over 2.2 million subscribers. Also, not usually included in many posts about Facebook applications, is the business motivation and growth of the company. In this time of economic crisis, I find it ironic, that the Internet based social networks seem to be in the clear, and unlike most are making money in a time when the world market is in bad shape. I feel this shows the power that the Internet has created: a virtual world almost completely separate from the real world. By adding the Facebook ???Causes???, it appears to be a smart move by both Facebook and those organizations who have used this program to reach out to where to public is-- on their computers.
    As a member of Facbeook, I have seen the application in use by some of my friends and other subscribers of the network. Although I am someone who feels strongly about being active in the non-profit world, I was skeptical to use this application, not fully understanding its point. As a user, it seemed useless, because I felt this was just another way for these organizations to get my information and ask for money. I strongly believe that active rather then monetary help is the most effective way to change the world???s most pressing issues. After reading your post, I did realize that for these organizations, the motivation is not purely to get donations. Discussing the support and awareness was something I had not originally thought of. Looking at Facebook ???Causes??? after reading your post; I did realize how much press a single organization can get on the social network. As you had mentioned the donation???s coming from Facebook subscribers is small, the connection that this program fosters might make difference. I am interested to see where Facebook ???Causes??? goes in the future. I have more faith in this approach after reading what you wrote that it might get more people involved, and hopefully with the publicity some will start to move out the virtual world and into the one that needs help.

  • Posted By: frogloop @ 11/04/2007 10:04:30 PM

    While this article points out an important trend that enables nonprofits to leverage the long tail of the internet, there are some major barriers to replacing tried and true fundraising methods. As you can see from the analysis we ran a few months ago, very few groups will benefit in a major way from these tools: http://www.frogloop.com/facebook-causes-analysis . In a sense, a social networking platform is a microcosm of the internet, and the competition for attention and donor dollars (or supporters) is the same. The individual or organization with the largest network, the best-known brand, and the sexiest issue at the moment will win the most support. It's the same problem we face when launching a website -- we need to promote it. The social networking tools can accelerate this process, and a few groups will pick up a lucky few thousand dollars here and there. However, social networks alone are not likely to replace the volume of fundraising dollars needed by organizations any time soon.

  • Posted By: Simolecredits @ 11/04/2007 4:41:21 PM

    This is going to be a new, global, modern credit servis specialy directed to the young, well paid modern people who's starts to set up they home. They work on the notebokks and do the most important things on them including: Banking, shopping, talking by the phone, checking credits offers via internet. www.simplecredits.com, will include all important information about the credits, and the best credit offers frome many banks and checked credit firms, credits ranks. Getting credits is now more popular then ever, and everybody knows that internet is the future!

    Another big attitiude of this web service is a simple domain. Alone word "credit" souns hard, and plastic. "Simplecredit" sounds more softly, and not so frightfully as "credit" word. Also simplecredits is a name easy to remember and with the end with .com.

    "A Quality Domain must look good, and above all SOUND good. It is best to be very descriptive of your products and/or your services, combined perhaps with a unique quality about them. And it is always best to combine words that are easy to remember. In terms of value and recognition, DOT COM was, is and will be the number 1"
    - Dr. Lieven P. Van Neste, President - 24hourNAMES.com

    www.simplecredits.com have fulfill all of those criterias! B simple with www.simplecreit.com

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now
 
The Greediest People of All Time
From Bernard Madoff to AIG, Wall Street has reinvented excess. But the Masters of the Universe didn't invent greed. A look at the despots, robber barons and others who made our shortlist.


 
 
PHOTOS
Wall Street's problems have captured the attention of Congress, the White House and the media. But on the country's Main Streets ordinary folks are wondering if anyone is paying attention to them. A look at how Americans are coping with the economic crisis.