Okay, just read several comments about having a child in this manner as being "selfish." Yet, the same could be said for having a child with daddy in the picture. Let's be honest. Couples have children for/because of several reasons and love is not always the motivator (or at least not the ONLY motivator). For example, a friend of mine did not feel "complete" until she had a child with her husband. Her husband on the other hand did not feel they were a ???real family??? until his son was born. The reasons behind their choice to procreate are not wrong- they are wonderful parents- but you???re a fool to believe that vanity is not part of the equation on some level. As far as I know, feelings of being ???incomplete??? or desire for a ???traditional family??? did not come from the unborn child (who is now the most adorable baby ever) but from its parents??? upbringing/insecurities/genuine emotional needs, etc. Which brings me to the question, what precisely is it about artificial insemination that causes such controversy? It can???t be just the child???s welfare? After all, there is plenty of proof that these women are financially and emotional capable of raising healthy children. Also, you would think someone who puts that much work into having a child, including potentially being ostracized by FAMILY members AND society at large, would love and care for the child. So what is it really? Religious beliefs (one person playing God etc.), our discomfort at possible changes in gender roles and thus the status quo, perceived superiority of couples who procreate under the sanctity of marriage, the economics behind artificial insemination, etc.? What is it? I think many people will find the answers in their hearts or hearts???and these won???t always be pretty.









Discuss