I didn't see the point to mentioning abortion clinic arson twice in this article. It just shows that writers feel justified in inserting an unrelated bias into reporting on these terrible wildfires. If they wanted to talk about other forms of arson why mention abortion clinics (only 173 cases of arson in the last 30 years), when they could have talked about arson directed against Christian churches - about 20 to 30 cases A MONTH!









Discuss