Quantcast
 
 
 
Andy Nelson / Christian Science Monitor-Getty Images
Harold Ford Jr., the head of the DLC, says "I take vindication as much as comfort in the fact that if you look at recent polling, the majority are rejecting the extremes of both parties."
CAPITAL SOURCES

‘I Caution Some in Our Party’

Harold Ford Jr. on the struggle for the Democrats' soul

 
Sponsored by
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

 

Liberal activists tend to dominate the Democratic Party's nominating process, but it's the centrists who help the party win national elections. Harold Ford Jr., the former congressman from Tennessee, is a leading voice of the latter camp. He narrowly lost a race for a Senate seat in 2006. If he had won, Ford would have been the first African-American senator from the South since Reconstruction. After his loss, he signed on as chairman of the Democratic Leadership Council—the policy group that is closely associated with Bill Clinton's presidency and that has counted Sen. Hillary Clinton among its leaders. (She no longer has a formal role, the chairman says.) Ford argues that Democrats need to win swing voters and worries that combative "netroots" types could alienate independents and moderate Democrats in 2008. But the activists argue that the DLC has become irrelevant and that the days of compromise are over. NEWSWEEK's Jeffrey Bartholet spoke to Ford about the struggle for the soul of his party. Excerpts:

NEWSWEEK: You've warned your fellow Democrats that the '08 election will not be a cakewalk. Are you worried?
Harold Ford Jr.:
Unless your opponent's name is "unopposed," you should always be concerned. And I think in this next election there are three things the Democrats have to do in order to win. First is to demonstrate that we can be trusted to defend and protect the country, that we can be trusted to care and tend to the needs of our military, and that we can be trusted to engage in a powerful and robust diplomacy, unlike we've seen in the last six or seven years. Second, we've got to demonstrate that we can be trusted with people's tax dollars, that we won't overtax people, and that we will look for every way to cut taxes and be fiscally responsible at the same time. Finally, we've got to demonstrate that we're squarely in the mainstream in the country when it comes to people's values. I caution some in our party, particularly some of the organizations and constituency groups who make up the party—particularly to the left—that this campaign will not be about George Bush; it will not be about how poorly he managed the war. It will be about how we will do it differently.

When the DLC held its annual convention in August, none of the candidates showed up. Yet most of the Democratic candidates attended the Daily Kos convention of netroots activists a few days later. Why?
You'd have to ask the candidates. I can only surmise that if you look at how Democratic and Republican primaries happen, they are really efforts to appeal to the far-right and the far-left wings of the party. But I take vindication as much as comfort in the fact that if you look at recent polling, the majority are rejecting the extremes of both parties. I'll make you one promise: next year the Democratic nominee will be at our convention.

The war is an important issue, and the DLC was pro-war.
I wouldn't call it pro-war.

It was [pro-war] in 2003.
Well, pro-war doesn't mean that we support the way this president has gone about fighting. We were supportive of removing Saddam Hussein, instilling stability in the country, reducing the threat that America faced from Al Qaeda and, equally important, the threat we thought was posed by Saddam Hussein. If we knew then what we know now … I was in the Congress; I would not have voted for the resolution. But at the same time, we're in a different place now. I caution anybody who continues to talk about the past on this issue.

The name perhaps most associated with the DLC is Bill Clinton. I'm wondering, does that help or hurt [your organization] as you approach an election in which Hillary Clinton is a candidate?
I don't see how it hurts us. A lot of the things that people long for today [were priorities during the Clinton presidency]. One of the things government can do is lower our current-accounts deficit and be more fiscally responsible. We need to address the long-term challenges of the country, including how to fund Medicare and Social Security. Bill Clinton did that. When you're a small-businessperson, you have to appreciate the way he helped lower health costs on businesspeople in this country. If you're a worker, you have to appreciate the number of jobs he helped create. We don't run from that at all. Now, if your question is, [with] Mrs. Clinton in the race, does that complicate things? Well, by no means. Most of the people running either chaired the DLC or chaired specific efforts that we launched at the DLC.

 
Discuss
Member Comments
  • Posted By: tippology1 @ 06/30/2008 8:52:37 AM

    Comment: Mr Ford like his big brother Obama need to go somewhere and get an identity of their own. Here are two educated guys who think things should be handed to them because they can speak well, please. You have to earn the right to be a congressmen or president but these two guy don't seem to think so. I guess they are both from the same cloth and that cloth needs to be thrown away before someone gets hurt.

  • Posted By: jojoc10 @ 11/03/2007 1:32:53 PM

    Comment: I liked how Jeffrey Bartholet caught Mr Ford in an obvious cover up. While Mr Ford might read this and convince others of a misunderstanding, I think we can all read this in good conscience and decipher what Mrs Clinton really means to the DLC vice that of what Mr Ford claims. It was a nice piece of journalism to follow up like Mr Bartholet did and to keep it in the final edit of this interview.

    If anything, this interview sort of depicts Mr ford as the consummate moderate who neither leans left nor right. For that reason, he inevitably doesn't stand for anything. Perhaps if he did, he may have faired better in his campaign in Tennessee. I think the voters there saw that despite all of the sizzle in his campaigns, in the end when push came to shove he was indeed transparant.

  • Posted By: greenbug @ 11/03/2007 11:01:49 AM

    Comment: the DLC needs to be destroyed. the clintons and the DLC almost destroyed this party. They are republican lite. If Hillary is our nominee we get another DLC rule and Dr. Dean, who saved this party from oblivion and made us viable again, will be replaced and the progressives destroyed. that is what they are looking for. They are threatened by the progressives and want us to be republicans. Most democrats hate the DLC.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
The Peek
 
 
SPORTS

Speedo's new and controversial high-tech LZR suit is helping swimmers smash dozens of records. How the company plans to capitalize on Olympic gold.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
 
Sponsored by
 
 
 
loadingLoading Menu