POLITICS

The Politics of Arrogance

Why candidates don't tout humility on the stump.

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: tomdavie @ 01/31/2008 1:56:10 PM

    Barrack Obama is one of the most aarogant candidates the republic has seen in its history. He has no experience but struts around like he has the market cornered on common sense.

  • Posted By: Azim @ 10/30/2007 2:10:27 PM

    This is where the leadership comes to play. We have seen Bush Administration's macho foreign policy did absolutely harmed the image of this country. Does this mean that we have to give up our values and ideals in order to further its own political agenda? We don't think so. The writer of this article may have missed the point that America always kept its stand in the world stage strong until the thigs that has been happening fr the last six years.

    No candidate should succum to use its political agenda by potraying themselves as a hawkish leader or for that matter be shown themselves as a weaker leader. We do not want that. What we want is that whoever has the conviction and moral authority to lead a nation such as ours will not need to be subjected as weak or arrogant. Ronald Reagan who brought the people of this country as a nation that united them in good times or hard times. We were all Americans in that regard and stood with his leadership and fought for the biggest enemy that of Communist Soviet Union and won.

    Bill Clinton through his intellectual leadership which brought this countri's stature as an economic giant around the world and yet envied by the world as a country of moral values and strength. I believe we could once again work for such leadership that will be envied by the world as it did in the past. Therefore, it does not matter if your leadeship is up to the per , no one leader will be subjected as an arrogant leader who will be vehemently attacked by. So, again leadership is the answer to all the assertion made in this article.

    • Posted By: Reibs @ 11/02/2007 6:33:58 PM

      I wonder what it is you are smoking or indulging in when you talk about Clinton and intellectual leadership? Absolutely no morals or values were ever demonstrated by that man or his spouse. I guess if you want someone who represents a party who believes they know how to spend your money and fix your life better than you yourself do he/she is the one for you. You can also say goodbye to individual freedoms if Hillary becomes the next president or for that matter anyone in the democratic party and I say nay to that any day. Elect someone who wants less government not more and you will solve the perception that so many worry about in the national arena about hating america. I for one could care less which country or countries hate us it is irrelevent to our day to day existence. Don't be a lemming be a leader that believes in personal freedoms and responsibility. Strength and virtue is an individual trait not a political one and no party has integrity. Vote Ron Paul and you will finally have a country to be proud of again.

      • Posted By: tdn0024 @ 01/30/2008 6:11:10 PM

        When Oklahoma City happened, there were very quick (undertandable) thoughts raised by the public and the media that it was overseas terror. Clinton, in a tense national moment, took the path of restraint. That helped his credibiity abroad.

        In the Balkans, he followed the US tradition of the WW! and WWII of letting the Europeans sort out their affairs, and stepping in later and decisively as a welcome party.

        A big contrast from George Bush's leadership.

  • Posted By: lfjrocks @ 11/19/2007 3:48:13 AM

    I think everyone should read pacgems comment on 11/03 at 500. Instead of talking like we know the facts, why dont we educate ourselves on the facts. Then we could make intelligent decisions.

  • Posted By: sutraupa @ 11/15/2007 8:45:19 AM

    Bush - why don't we say "King George". Thats what he's acting out. Or you could say he's a cry baby - You don't give me what I want - "ill just veto it." In other words, if you give me carrots, I just won't eat them.

  • Posted By: Unknownp @ 11/06/2007 9:15:07 PM

    First of all, no one can sway you one way o the other without you allowing it. Your decisions are just that and you decide how to feel think and whatever we as a country need to take responsibility for our own actions and stop placing blame. Because in the end we vote, what is strange to me is the first part Bush's time in the white house people were complaining then and they voted him back in for the rest of the term so if Bush was so bad why did he get voted back in. We don't know all they deal with there in the White House so you don't necssarily know what Bush is doing or not. A lot of things that happen are our own faults not Bush's like Obeseity, Drugs, pregnancy, murder, homosexuality. Remember Bush is only 1 person. The war would've happened anyways, because it's obvious that Muslims/ Arabics hate Americans and we need to defnd our country and that is a responsibility to do so.. I am not a fan of war by the way but it needs to be done pulling out is a huge mistake because that will bring them here to make things worse.

  • Posted By: CME63 @ 11/03/2007 7:40:27 PM

    It is not a regime, it is comprised of ELECTED Represenatives, If you want to fear somthing fear that we have reliquished our Reposibility to oversee these bodys inleu of satilite tv , and fast easy maels that ultimately make you sick. if you want to feel Terror, be terrorized by the fact that we have given the bulk of this resposiblity to indutsry and radical fringes,with morals and justifactions on a par with any jihadist .we seem to have raplaced WE THE PEOPLE, with me the person. when you belive that your rights outweigh your resposibilitys, you have failed your Country. P.S.you cannot be a Patriot who " Loved Their Country" the two statements condadict eachother

  • Posted By: skd500 @ 11/03/2007 12:58:33 PM

    President Bush always has a way of saying the right thing, but his actions behind everyone's back never live up to his words, we should include some of our candidates in the Hollywood awards shows, for the actors they are, trying to sway people to their side and then failing to live up to their own expectations........I, for one, have lost my faith in our leaders right now, I feel tortured and terrorized by them.....and they say torture doesn't exist and is not used by our present regime, but I as an American citizen feel tortured by them, I can't help but feel it, and I don't see or feel anything different, I hope they prove me wrong, and reinstill my faith in my country I so very much loved and believed in.....I feel like the last true patriot who really loved what my country once stood for, but isn't now.......thank you for my opinion......Stephanie-skd500

  • Posted By: bedanged @ 11/03/2007 1:37:18 AM

    Forget humility. Bush the elder loved the pomp and circumstance of being president. He didn't care for the hard decisions and problems he faced while in office. Compared to Ronald Reagan, Bush WAS wimpy. He was like a big ship without a rudder. When it came time face Bill Clinton in the debates, he seemed disconnected and disinterested. His son is arrogant, lacks intelligence and comes off as goofy as his dad. And Hillary?? Let's not waste our time wondering whether Hillary is humble. The word that scares me is paranoi. Don't forget that when her husband was in the White House, it was Hillary who proffered that "...a vast, right-wing conspiracy" was out to get them. Do we want another paronoid president like Richard Nixon.

    • Posted By: pacgems @ 11/03/2007 5:01:36 AM

      Well Nixon was reelected AFTER it was revealed he was a paranoid drunk, so who do you blame Nixon or the voters who reelected him.
      As for the ???vast right wing conspiracy??? It is well documented. The republicans have a very efficient media disinformation system that includes the likes of Rush Limbaugh the Limbaugh wanna bee???s, Faux News, the religious right who campaigned in Their churches for G.W. You know those folks who deny the very existence of science calling it a theory.

      We can easily see the effects of this even today in the 40% of Americans who still believe Iraq had something to do with 9/11.
      The fact is anyone who read any major newspaper in the months leading up to the invasion of Iraq knew before that invasion this was not true, they had to know WMD???s were at least unlikely if not none existent, they had to know Al Qaida was not in Iraq.
      They had to wonder who gassed the Kurdish village, there was considerable evidence it was Iran at least the weaponry used was Iranian, They had to know the administration would go to lengths to hide the truth, Ambassador Wilson???s only ???crime??? was to tell the truth and his family was attacked as a result to discredit him and the truth.

      I could go on but the fact is far too many ???voters??? do not read the newspapers beyond the comics and then rant about the news media being in someone???s pocket. Of course we have to make a distinction between news media and opinion media.

      And by the way I am not defending Hillary Clinton, she after all voted to allow the invasion of Iraq; apparently she doesn???t get past the comics either but that doesn???t make her paranoid.
      It???s time for the voters to get humble and admit they have no clue what they are doing maybe then they will seek the truth before they vote instead of arrogantly heaping a lot of unfounded criticism on people in an effort to make it appear they are informed.

      And I'm not directing this at you I'm simply adding a thought

  • Posted By: tcbrewer @ 11/03/2007 2:06:11 AM

    I really do not know how to say what it is that I want to say. So, maybe I should also be a political candidate for president. I hate the war. When I was in basic training the Faulklands occured. By the time I got out of the military the 1st Bush regime was hitting the Middle East. Now I have a son almost old enough to be drafted should we keep getting our children killed, in the second Bush fiasco. I do not care about what other Nations policies are, so long as they do not hurt the United States. I am not talking about out producing us in cars or toys but actually causing dire harm. We need to clean our own laundry before we try to tell nearly 4 Billion other people how to live. With the insurance, homeownership, homeless, drug traffic, pedofileodicy nation that we must all contend with how the hell do we have gull to think we can guide others lives. You say the candidates are soft or do not want to appear that way. I say we have lost sight of what this Country was based on. I am so very angry at this moment that I want to make terrible threats and say the worst kind of things about my Government and Country. Though, I will not, because that will get US; see that word U.S. , you know "us": U.S. , us, together we stand, divided we fall. I do not care if my neighbor is a Jew, Italian, Mexican, German or Hillbilly from WV. If we cannot find a way to Unite and stand together and quit being guided by Greed and Fear, we are going to fall at least, and parish at worst. You want to really be a patriot? Then let the Moral Majority, and the DemaGods, and Republirants know that we are way passed on what guild holds the house. That how we as Free Americans can hold our heads high in a world that is willing to fly a plan into the Office Building YOU work in. Don't you get it. Our Government has made too many mistakes and cannot risk any admission of Guilty. We have Built Wars, Famine, Hatred, Paranioa and down right Deception and called them the Righteous way to Live. Though that one truth alone may cost us the most valuable prize of all, Our Freedom. Afraid, please continue to be as you vote in November for people who rely on Money, the devils hand to get elected. He who pays the most has my vote. Just be sure that the next time you Vote it is not with your Life.

  • Posted By: Unknownp @ 11/03/2007 12:56:21 AM

    I do believe humility is something that should be strongly stressed, I can clearly see that all the Democratic candidates are full of crap and are only in in for themselves and not our country. I would dissagree on the fact that people think Bush is arrogant and he's not trying to be he's standing up for what he believes in and I think America is afraid of that because of the simple fact that if their belief system is different than yours the you are basing your decision on the fact that you don't like them becausethey dissagree with you that's what's going on and that's a major issue. First decide if self is right and take a good look at self before you jump in and say someone is arrogant because it could be a false judgement which American citizens are good for. There are many candadites that are in it for the glory and nothing else. Not being president but jst to have the name.

  • Posted By: home160 @ 11/02/2007 11:22:52 PM

    First and foremost, I am tired of ignorance and arrogant. Truth of the matter is is that if the war was fought on the battlefield and not from behind a desk, we would have the bastards who did this to us in the first place. No one would say we're doing the wrong thing at home, our candidates wouldn't have a case against one another except for what we have to take care of here at home. I say bring every one of our troops home, tell every other country that you are on your own, but don't mess with us. Or, get this war away from a desk and let them do what they were trained to do, DEFEND OUR FREEDOM!!!

  • Posted By: amaterasu2004 @ 11/02/2007 11:13:51 PM

    Fighting the wimp factor was only a factor as a result of H.W.'s own insecurity as a man, who was in a position of power, perhaps the most powerful in the world. Perhaps because he knew the true power came from his wife, the woman who owns the fact of being a woman is the powerful and has much humility because of the fact she does not lose her feminity of being woman. When man is able to be as a woman he can become a man, and not before. Power comes from within and outside of oneself, man has the most difficulty with this as a result of being powerless over woman, hence the extremists views on the female form and the need to cover it up in some religious dogma, which has always come from man. Fear is the factor in all of this, fear of woman and fear of fear itself, which is most likely where Rosevelt got it, especially knowing what we know of his wife...

    Hillary Clinton is a great example, along with the speaker of the house, of what happens when woman gives up her natural power of woman, which happens when woman tries to be a man, whom they think has the power, it is like the catch 22 in a way, feminity comes with being a powerful woman, hence the fear some men have of a feminine woman. Bill Clinton is powerless over Hillary because he thinks she has power, which is where all the errors have come about, and why she stays with an idiot...

    Arrogance comes only from ignorance, period.

  • Posted By: Coals @ 11/02/2007 11:09:27 PM

    Perhaps a job advertisement for President of the United States might read; "Wanted, Captain for leaky raft stranded unknown distance up *** Creek without paddle or GPS." Humility, yes. But perhaps even more we need leaders who do not mind wading in a lot of ***.

  • Posted By: veevee @ 11/02/2007 11:01:02 PM

    15% prefers humble as proper ethical modern democratique and diplomatic policies to 85 % to thinks arrogance is a sign or sexyness. let them market their target ..

  • Posted By: lfjrocks @ 11/02/2007 8:35:27 PM

    I would like to say here that when it comes to running a country, its easy to be a hackler in the back of the crowd and try to tear down those that are in office. If Everyone has such a problem with where our country is at, Instead of doing the easy thing- complaining about it, why not try to DO something about it. America was made Great, and yes Im going to use the word great despite all the anti-american culture and anti-flag theory out there, not just because of its leaders- although that plays a huge part- but also because of its people. I dont think that anybody here in this discussion, republican or democrat, or the people that scream and criticize the loudest, could do a better job than any of our presidents...past and current. To Ipanema- while it is very true that our media can be pretty messed up sometimes its dangerous to believe that everyone is on an ??agenda of evil.???? You cant believe that everything is a conspiracy. To nrussell- I appreciate your comment on keeping America a Free nation, and that our canidates are to serve the american people and not their own self interest. America is Free, and I know that every single american that complains against our government, would like to keep it that way. To all - There is talk about America just looking out for itself, number 1. While that is valid and mandatory- we need to protect and perserve our country. Also consider history. Remember WWII when Hitler almost took over all of Europe and possibly much more, because of a bunch of passive men not acting on principle. Remember Pearl Harbor. No man is an island. And no Country is either.

    • Posted By: veevee @ 11/02/2007 10:46:13 PM

      what is wrong with u people? america is still great. and im not even american.. lighten up

  • Posted By: veevee @ 11/02/2007 10:43:56 PM

    in theory the stock boy doesnt get promoted to manager, but reality shows they do. the sales person that can t sale, is often sales manager. al gore lost because he was cheated and bought out! and what with arrogance? i like arrogant. i dont know why americans fl;atter themselves in thinking they are arrogant.

  • Posted By: DANIEL642001 @ 11/02/2007 8:03:23 PM

    YEP BUSH LIES THATS WHAT HE IS GOOD AT BUT THERE IS MORE HE IS ALSO GOOD AT SPENDING ALOT OF MONEY OVER SEAS. GREAT JOB BUSH GREAT JOB YOUR KILLING OUR COUNTRY HAVE FUN ON VACATION........ PS YOUR A IDIOT

    • Posted By: bindybow @ 11/02/2007 10:39:50 PM

      You are an idiot smart guy, not a idiot.

  • Posted By: skeeballguy @ 11/02/2007 9:43:20 PM

    Personally, I don't mind if a politician is arrogant as long as he or she brings the goods to the table. I'm tired of Americans voting for candidates based off of what they hear them say all along their campaign trail. If people want some insight as to what a candidate might do if elected, all they need to do is review what they have accomplished in the past. If America would have done that in the first place, we would have President Gore and more than likely things would be a little better. Also, the idea that if a candidate uses big words and talks about things that some people don't understand is labled as elitist or a *** is completey backwards. There are lots of good ol' boys in this country that have no idea what a leader is saying unless he speaks like the current president....those people need to grow up and read a book. I suppose this whole current fiasco can be written off as an experiment: What if we elect someone who's track record shows that they would be a pretty bad leader. Should the dumb stockboy who always messes up and takes too many breaks be promoted to manager? I don't think so.

  • Posted By: lfjrocks @ 11/02/2007 9:00:31 PM

    newsweek5000- you had some very good points. Why dont more Nations step up and take responsibility. I would be interested in continuing this discussion as a later date.

  • Posted By: lfjrocks @ 11/02/2007 8:52:57 PM

    I Guess everyone is gone, or have run out of things to say

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse