‘What She Can’t Do Is Have It Both Ways’

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: kalla56 @ 11/05/2007 4:44:00 PM

    I am a 60 yr.old woman, wildly liberal, am a feminist, etc. No way will I support Hillary! She is totally disingenuous. I don't know any woman with my views who supports Hillary. We need someone who is honest and answers questions in a straightforward manner. I love Bill, but we need a new, non-dynastic face in the White House. Either Obama or Edwards would be a great candidate.

    • Posted By: mellieblu @ 11/06/2007 10:12:33 AM

      New and non-dynastic does not necessarily equal competent. Look at Jimmy Carter. He was an abysmal president. His heart was, no doubt, in the right place; look at all he's done post-presidency! But given that recent historical lesson, how could we say for sure Edwards or Obama will be any more effective?

      I am a liberal and a feminist. I support Hillary. Edwards, as far as I've been able to tell has no policy direction of his own, except to try to punch holes in those of his opponents'. Obama has been standing on his "track record" of voting against the war in Iraq. If I'm not mistaken, he was not Senator Obama at that time. How could he dance that dance if he wasn't even invited to the party?? I know he has held strongly to the opinion that he wouldn't have voted for the war. He was not privy to the information those who were senators at the time were privy to, nor to the pressures of that time. Given he was not there, he has no leg to stand on with this argument. It's a moot point.

      Another of Obama's key points is "NOT politics as usual". His plan was to go out and sell himself, and not just criticize the other candidates. I loved that about his candidacy. HMMM, but now, time is getting shorter and shorter and seems as though he's going on the attack!! Shock beyond SHOCK. He is a politician after all. How disappointing.

  • Posted By: fordgwf @ 11/06/2007 12:20:26 AM

    Dems aren't interested in truth I guess ..

  • Posted By: fordgwf @ 11/06/2007 12:19:51 AM

    Dems aren't interested in truth I guess ..

  • Posted By: RetCombatVet @ 11/05/2007 10:18:44 PM

    " So is she being honest?
    I think she was being disingenuous.

    What's the difference between disingenuous and dishonest?
    You'll have to ask her."

    This is precisely what gets him in trouble. You brought it up so carry through.

  • Posted By: RetCombatVet @ 11/05/2007 10:17:08 PM

    "I think she was being disingenuous."

    Why ask her wjen you brought the subject up?

  • Posted By: Jon_Sparks @ 11/05/2007 9:16:48 PM

    Most of you complaining about Obama "mudslinging" have no idea what mudslinging is. Comparing Max Cleland to Osama bin Laden, THAT'S mudslinging. Accusing Kerry of self-inflicting his wounds in Vietnam, THAT'S mudslinging. Accusing McCain of fathering a black love child, THAT'S mudslinging. Accusing Hillary Clinton of being a closet ***, THAT'S mudslinging. Accusing Obama of practically being a sleeper agent, THAT???S mudslinging. John Edward???s ???Barber-gate???, and being accused of pimping out his cancer-inflicted wife, THAT???S mudslinging. Criticizing your opponent , whether those criticisms are valid or not, is NOT mudslinging. If Clinton is as thin-skinned as most of the posters here, then God help her in the general election.

  • Posted By: Jon_Sparks @ 11/05/2007 9:15:02 PM

    Most of you complaining about Obama "mudslinging" have no idea what mudslinging is. Comparing Max Cleland to Osama bin Laden, THAT'S mudslinging. Accusing Kerry of self-inflicting his wounds in Vietnam, THAT'S mudslinging. Accusing McCain of fathering a black love child, THAT'S mudslinging. Accusing Hillary Clinton of being a closet ***, THAT'S mudslinging. Accusing Obama of practically being a sleeper agent, THAT???S mudslinging. John Edward???s ???Barber-gate???, and being accused of pimping out his cancer-inflicted wife, THAT???S mudslinging. Criticizing your opponent , whether those criticisms are valid or not, is NOT mudslinging. If Clinton is as thin-skinned as most of the posters here, then God help her in the general election.

  • Posted By: sarainitaly @ 11/05/2007 5:34:24 AM

    You have got to be kidding me?!

    "She said that she was for the [New York Gov. Eliot] Spitzer plan and in the span of two minutes said she wasn't for the Spitzer plan."

    She said the SAME thing as Obama. She understands the need for it, understands why he wants to implement the plan, knows there are bigger issues, but doesn't agree with the whole plan. She said the same friggin thing as Obama.

    "Do you think the majority of the American public is in favor of giving driver's licenses to illegal immigrants?
    Absolutely not. I'm sure they aren't.

    But you are in favor.
    What I have said is that it is better off that we know that people who are driving know the rules of the road, are subject to insurance, are making sure that we know we can track them if they get in an accident. A lot of security experts agree with me on this issue. It's not optimal. What we need to do is make sure that we don't have undocumented workers coming into the country in the first place. But here's the more important point: people know where I stand on this and we can have a serious conversation and debate about it."

    Talk about disingenuous. They both agree.

    And I am sorry, but THIS is the major failure of the Clinton White House? A failed healthcare proposal. Gee, perhaps we should burn her at the stake. What a failure! Ugh

    It is driving me crazy how people keep referring to the Clinton dynasty, the Clinton failures, the Clinton lies. What failures? What dynasty? And the lies, ok, a husband lied about cheating on his wife. At least it was with a woman. (not because I am anti-gay, but because of all the hypocrisy by the *family values* republicans caught in gay scandals)

    I don't know about the rest of you, but I remember the Clinton presidency as a good one. Times were good, We had great international relations. Economy was great. The only thing that marred it was the insistence of the hypocritical republicans who tried to bring down a guy for getting a bj.

    Seriously, what were the major failures of the Clinton White House?

    And as far as the candidates ganging up on Hillary, they did. You can't watch the debate and not think that. Should they have? Yes, I believe they were right to do so. It is good practice for her when she faces off against the Republican candidate and when she gets in meetings with world leaders. I think she did good under fire and for people to try and twist that one answer regarding the drivers license is total crap. Again, she said the same thing Obama did.

    • Posted By: don_llll @ 11/05/2007 9:47:49 AM

      What failures? Are you kidding me? Look the Clinton's will say anything and do anything to get elected. Bill Clinton sold Presidential pardons for campaign and library donations - look at the Marc Rich and 139 others who received a pardon on President Clinton's last day of office. Hmm.... well we also have Clinton campaign contributor (serious cash) Bernard Scwartz, who single-handedly is determined to provide China with missile technology. IN the span of a couple years China has gone from bad missiles to rockets to the moon. Oh I guess the fact the Chinese military keeps trying to put illegal campaign contributions into the democratic coffers (Hillary got busted as well) I guess the fact Bill had a chance to Osama Bin Laden but was too busy getting a bj... On the marriage thing, ok who will honestly say they would not be upset with their daughter if the person she married never intended to be faithful - I do not support the hypocrisy of the Republicans, but I feel a President should be some kind of role model and letting your husband routinely find company outside of the marriage is disgusting.
      Hillary spouts her years as First Lady as qualifications, but refuses to let her papers be released. She wants socialized medicine but refuses to discuss how it will work in America. She takes money illegally from Chinese corporations owned by the Chinese Army - she has no morals. Period.

      • Posted By: sarainitaly @ 11/05/2007 5:12:22 PM

        I messed up and replied to you both at the top of the thread. This site is not working well for me, and I didn't realize I could post directly here. Sorry.

    • Posted By: Hitch @ 11/05/2007 10:04:29 AM

      Seriously? You thought the Clinton years were good? Obviously you have a short memory. Remember events like Somalia (what a waste of U.S. Service mens lives), intervention in Kosovo and totally ignored the genocide of thousands in Rwanda. Regarding Clinton's ethics he was disbarred "in Arkansas" his home state at the time for perjury and even though he wasn't convicted in Whaitewater this was teh result of the "deal" he cut to save himself. Lets not even get into his misuse of power and influence - Monice Lewinsky et al.

      On his last day in office (January 20, 2001), Clinton issued 141 pardons and 36 commutations.[21][125] Most of the controversy surrounded Marc Rich and allegations that Hillary Clinton's brother, Hugh Rodham, accepted payments in return for influencing the president's decision-making regarding the pardons. The 1996 United States campaign finance controversy was an alleged effort by the People's Republic of China (PRC) to influence the domestic policies of the United States, prior to and during the Clinton administration and also involved the fundraising practices of the administration itself.

      Additionally, his indecision to enact action direct against Osama Bin Laden after he was linked to the terrorist bombing of the Cole enboldened and contributed to Al Queda's growth. Finally, The first was Operation Desert Fox, a bombing campaign designed to weaken Saddam Hussein's grip on power over Iraq. The four-day campaign lasted from December 16 to December 19, 1998. It began after Clinton signed H.R. 4655 into law on October 31, 1998, which instituted a policy of "regime change" against Iraq, though it explicitly stated that it did not speak to the use of American military forces. The law was signed months after his State of the Union Address to Congress where Clinton warned Congress of Saddam Hussein's pursuit of nuclear weapons: "Together we must also confront the new hazards of chemical and biological weapons, and the outlaw states, terrorists and organized criminals seeking to acquire them. Saddam Hussein has spent the better part of this decade, and much of his nation's wealth, not on providing for the Iraqi people, but on developing nuclear, chemical and biological weapons and the missiles to deliver them. The United Nations weapons inspectors have done a truly remarkable job, finding and destroying more of Iraq's arsenal than was destroyed during the entire gulf war. Now, Saddam Hussein wants to stop them from completing their mission. I know I speak for everyone in this chamber, Republicans and Democrats, when I say to Saddam Hussein, "You cannot defy the will of the world," and when I say to him, "You have used weapons of mass destruction before; we are determined to deny you the capacity to use them again. Who really led us into Iraq???


  • Posted By: sarainitaly @ 11/05/2007 5:07:43 PM

    PART THREE
    "The tape proves the Clinton administration was aggressively tracking al-Qaida a year before 9/11. But that also raises one enormous question: If the U.S. government had bin Laden and the camps in its sights in real time, why was no action taken against them?
    Bob Kerry, a former senator and current 9/11 commission member, said, ???The most important thing the Clinton administration could have done would have been for the president, either himself or by going to Congress, asking for a congressional declaration to declare war on al-Qaida, a military-political organization that had declared war on us.???
    In reality, getting bin Laden would have been extraordinarily difficult. He was a moving target deep inside Afghanistan. Most military operations would have been high-risk. What???s more, Clinton was weakened by scandal, and there was no political consensus for bold action, especially with an election weeks away."
    The Republicans launched a massive attack on Bill Clinton, dragging him through all the crap regarding Monica Lewinsky, as a distraction, so Bin Laden could get away! So, once Bush stole the election, they could launch their plan of a war with the middle east. All they needed was their event like *pearl harbor* with our *#1 enemy Osama*, and they were in business. They got what they needed, Osama is still free, and Bush and his cronies are rich, rich, rich!
    Bush and Bush 42 led us into Iraq. Nice try though.

  • Posted By: sarainitaly @ 11/05/2007 5:06:20 PM

    PART TWO
    Rwanda - Rwanda was a tragedy, one that Clinton personally apologized for. "With the failure in Somalia still very much in the minds of American policymakers, neither the United States nor the United Nations moved aggressively to stop the slaughter."

    Kosovo - In 1999, Clinton moved with NATO to begin a massive bombing campaign against the Serbian government to end its "ethnic cleansing" of Albanians in the Kosovo region. Specially trained forces from the Serb Interior Ministry, along with paramilitary forces that had been active in Bosnia years before, had created hundreds of thousands of refugees through the application of this policy; Serb forces also murdered thousands of ethnic Albanians. But the bombing worked and, with the help of Russian diplomacy, forced the Serbian government to withdraw from the region. With no American battle casualties during the fighting, U.S. troops joined British, French, and other NATO forces to occupy Kosovo as peacekeepers under an agreement worked out with Yugoslavia. The province remained nominally part of Yugoslavia, but the Kosovars had gained autonomy, and the possibility of eventual independence. Clinton's forceful stand in Bosnia and Kosovo enhanced his foreign policy resume.

    Disbarred - For 5 years. Clinton agreed to the Arkansas fine and suspension Jan. 19, the day before he left office, as part of an understanding with Independent Counsel Robert Ray to end the Monica Lewinsky investigation. The agreement also satisfied the legal effort by the Arkansas Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct to disbar Clinton for giving misleading testimony in the Paula Jones sexual harassment case. Who wouldn't cop a plea to avoid a sex scandal? Ask any republican, and they will agree.

    Clinton pardoned 3 more during his presidency then Reagan. He received 2000 petitions. Mark Rich's pardon was supported by Scooter Libby, so there probably was something fishy about it. HAHA Clinton was never convicted of wrong doing. The presidential pardon is the right of the president. He did what he did. As for Hill's brother, who wouldn't pardon their family? He served his full term in jail, and it was for a cocaine charge. As for him taking money to get his friends pardons, maybe he needed the money for drugs? haha anyway he gave the money back, and they are not responsible if he was lying to them. Every family has their black sheep, no?

    Failure to capture Bin Laden - Oh my god! You just made me realize what happened!?! Clinton's failure to capture Bin Laden was because he was mired in scandal! (Am I a little slow on this one?)

    Clinton had been on the hunt for Bin Laden, they were tracking him, and had satellite images of him. So, if the Clinton administration was so close to finding Osama, and were actively seeking him, why did Rice and the Bush administration treat Osama like a non-threat, before 9/11, and in their comments after 9/11??

  • Posted By: kgmasta @ 11/05/2007 10:31:11 AM

    Who is Barack Obama? Who is being disingenuous?????
    Probable U. S. presidential candidate, Barack Hussein Obama was born in Honolulu, Hawaii, to Barack Hussein Obama, Sr., a Black Muslim from Nyangoma-Kogel, Kenya and Ann Dunham, a white ATHIEST from Wichita, Kansas. Obama's parents met at the University of Hawaii. When Obama was two years old, his parents divorced. His father returned to Kenya. His mother then married Lolo Soetoro, a RADICAL Muslim from Indonesia. When Obama was 6 years old, the family relocated to Indonesia. Obama attended a MUSLIM school in Jakarta. He also spent two years in a Catholic school. Obama takes great care to conceal the fact that he is a Muslim. He is quick to point out that, "He was once a Muslim, but that he also attended Catholic school." Obama's political handlers are attempting to make it appear that Obama's introduction to Islam came via his father, and that this influence was temporary at best. In reality, the senior Obama returned to Kenya soon after the divorce, and never again had any direct influence over his son's education. Lolo Soetoro, the second husband of Obama's mother, Ann Dunham, introduced his stepson to Islam. Obama was enrolled in a Wahabi school in Jakarta. Wahabism is the RADICAL teaching that is followed by the Muslim terrorists who're now waging Jihad against the western world. Since it is politically expedient to be a CHRISTIAN when seeking Major public office in the United States, Barack Hussein Obama has joined the United Church of Christ in an attempt to downplay his Muslim background. Let us all remain alert concerning Obama's expected presidential candidacy. The Muslims have said they plan on destroying the US from the inside out, what better way to start than at the highest level - through the President of the United States, one of their own!!!! ALSO , keep in mind that when he was sworn into office - he DID NOT use
    the Holy Bible, but instead the Koran (Their equivalency to our Bible, but very different beliefs) .
    Would you want this man leading our country?......NOT ME!!! IF you are going to be in our great country, live by OUR rules. Why even let him be sworn in WITHOUT the Holy Bible?? That should tell us ALL something right there!!!!!!

    • Posted By: RICKYR @ 11/05/2007 5:04:03 PM

      AMEN BROTHER,YOU HIT IT RIGHT ON THE HEAD,COULDNT HAVE SAID IT BETTER

  • Posted By: sarainitaly @ 11/05/2007 5:00:12 PM

    Reply to Hitch and Don_1111 - It is long, so I have to break it up in three parts.

    PART ONE:
    Somalia - you mean when the troops were sent in by Bush 42? That Somalia disaster? The failure of American troops to be properly equipped for the mission, which led to the resignation of Secretary of Defense Les Aspin, was in part responsible for the failure there. An operation that was being managed not only by UN headquarters in New York but also by dozens of contributing governments.

    Bush 42 was warned:
    "There is little reason to believe that the bitter and long-standing clan rivalries that have turned Somalia into a particularly murderous African Lebanon will yield to outside intervention???. Tragic as the situation is in Somalia ??? the dissolution of the Somali nation-state does not affect vital USG security interests. Accordingly, USG should think???and think again???before allowing itself to become bogged down in a quagmire without the promise of offsetting concomitant benefits."

    In December 1992, in one of his last acts as President, George Bush proposed to the U.N. that United States combat troops lead the intervention force. The U.N. accepted this offer and 25,000 U.S. troops were deployed to Somalia. President Bush stated that this would not be an ???open-ended commitment.??? The objective of Operation Restore Hope was to rapidly secure the trade routes in Somalia so that food could get to the people. President Bush stated that U.S. troops would be home in time for Bill Clinton???s inauguration in January.

    Once President Clinton was inaugurated he stated his desire to scale down the U.S. presence in Somalia, and to let the U.N. forces take over. In March 1993 the U.N. officially took over the operation, naming this mission UNOSOM ??? II. The objective of this mission was to promote ???nation building??? within Somalia. One main target was to disarm the Somali people. UNOSOM ??? II stressed restoring law and order, improving the infrastructure, and assisting the people with setting up a representative government.

    President Clinton supported the U.N. mandate and ordered the number of U.S. troops in Somalia reduced, to be replaced by U.N. troops. By June 1993, only 1200 U.S. troops remained in Somalia. However, tragically, 18 soldiers died in Somalia the Battle of Mogadishu.

    Perhaps committing troops to a country in the middle of clan warfare, when advisors reported that it was too risky, in the final month of office was not the smartest move by Bush 42. Blame all you want, but this was not a Clinton failure.

  • Posted By: Yeah_Right @ 11/05/2007 4:44:32 PM

    Hillary can have it both ways Barack! You're losing and so is Edwards. How's that for an honest approach.

  • Posted By: arizona49 @ 11/05/2007 4:24:31 PM

    I will be very happy when people begin to realize that this campaign should not be about what Bill Clinton did while he was in office. If so, then maybe Bill should run. Is he the one truly running? I find it quite ironic that Bill and Hillary have dismissed the contributions of his cabinet members and the brillance, talent and intellect he surrounded himself with during his administration, including but not limited to one of the best sec of state, Ron Brown and Al Gore, his vice president. These folks didn't ride in on the Clinton Arkansas wagon. Furthermore, have you obama bashers thought to look at the economic climate in Arkansas during Clinton's administration as governor. Compare that to the decline in our climate during his administration and his failure to take the threats of the taliban serious. Some of the major problems we are having today are a result of Bill and I presume Hillary's pillow talking.

  • Posted By: montecucco @ 11/05/2007 3:55:56 PM

    Perhaps once in a lifetime (and perhaps not that often) the American public has the opportunity to elect a president as brilliant, honest, and genuine as Barack Obama. Someone with the natural abilities and knowledge to succeed on a grand scale, who cares more about the country and its people than the power, influence and money that comes with the job (or in Hilary???s case, a designation in the history books as the first U.S. woman president). We Americans continually do things that are shockingly stupid - like reelecting George Bush even though he had proven his incompetence over the prior 3 years. For the future of the nation and the world, can't afford to get it wrong this time.

  • Posted By: montecucco @ 11/05/2007 3:52:17 PM

    Perhaps once in a lifetime (and perhaps not that often) the American public has the opportunity to elect a president as brilliant, honest, and genuine as Barack Obama. Someone with the natural abilities and knowledge to succeed on a grand scale, who cares more about the country and its people than the power, influence and money that comes with the job (or in Hilary???s case, a designation in the history books as the first U.S. woman president). We Americans continually do things that are shockingly stupid - like reelecting George Bush even though he had proven his incompetence over the prior 3 years. For the future of the nation and the world, can't afford to get it wrong this time.

  • Posted By: OldPhatPhart @ 11/05/2007 3:45:53 PM

    Everyone seems to think the a presidential candidate is supposed to be omniscient and omnipresent. They don't need to know everything; that is why they have advisors and Secretaries of Defense, et cetera. They only have to make a final decision based on what advise they have received. A candidate only needs a path and a plan. How they achieve success is through their advisors, et al.

    As for those who believe Barack Obama is where he is at today is because of the Clintons, someone really needs to go back a little further in history. Clintons had nothing to do with putting Barack or anyone else where he is today. I think Robert Kennedy had a lot more to do with helping minorities achieve positions they are able to attain today.

    No matter who you like. VOTE. If you don't, nothing you say here means anything.

  • Posted By: SuzPas76 @ 11/05/2007 3:29:40 PM

    Let's clear something up. Hillary is riding on the coat tails of her husband and skirting the issues. The US isn't that stupid and we are ready for a real change. Obama is the next president.

  • Posted By: pab0228 @ 11/05/2007 2:19:36 PM

    In response to "the country is not ready for a woman to be president" - I have to totally disagree. I'm part of this country and I'm ready for a woman president.

    • Posted By: Rauol Duke @ 11/05/2007 3:27:32 PM

      Woman, man or some cross dressing conservative, that is not the issue. The issue is who is right for America at this time. It is definitely not Hillary. She is hostile and controling. I say this from dealing with her. It is her way or no way. We could have had some form of Unversal Health Care in 94 if she could back down. She will not end this war in Iraq and she will expand it to provide for her corporate donors. Really look at her record not what she say it is and you will be running from her faster then a gun man in the mall.

      Look at the Clintons did with their other phony war on drugs. They expanded and funneled more money to corporate donors. Expand private armies. Expand law enforcement. Expanded jails. When they should of expand drug treatment. The average addict get 6 six weeks in patient when the industry says the need a minium of six months. I could go on and on but I have a real job, I am not working for one of the campaigns.

  • Posted By: Rdfr @ 11/05/2007 3:22:18 PM

    Obana has no clue which direction to go. Hillary and Bill made Obama he should never forget that Clinton made him!!! Had it not been for Clinton Obama would just be an unknown now he has the nerve to attack the Clinton's the way he does. If Obama was smart he would have pushed his stupid ego aside ran vice to Hillary and after the next 8 years he would have gotten the experience to be President. If Obama gets to be President of USA he would be the most smart ass, spoiled leader we have had. As a Black American Male i would never vote for him-not now!

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse