The Hillary Paper Chase: 3,022,030 Documents To Go
During last week's Democratic presidential debate, Hillary Clinton faced tough questions about why so many of her papers at her husband's presidential library in Little Rock, Ark., are still secret—and her answers have only invited more questions. Clinton said during the debate that one chunk of records, from her days heading up her husband's health-care task force, had been released. "Now, all of the records, as far as I know, about what we did with health care, those are already available," she said. But National Archives documents obtained by NEWSWEEK and interviews with Archives officials indicate that the vast majority of the Clintons' health-care task-force records are still under lock and key in Little Rock—and might stay that way for some time.
In a letter last year responding to a Freedom of Information Act request by the conservative group Judicial Watch, Melissa Walker, supervisory archivist of the Clinton Presidential Library, wrote that archivists had identified 3,022,030 still-unreleased health-care documents, along with 2,884 e-mails and 1,021 photos covered by the group's request. Archives officials at the Clinton library have yet to process the Judicial Watch request or release the several million pages of task-force documents, including many key internal memos written by Mrs. Clinton and her advisers about how to restructure the health-care industry. This prompted the group to file a new lawsuit last week demanding their immediate disclosure. "This doesn't pass the giggle test," said Christopher Farrell, the group's research director, about Clinton's statement that "all" of her health-care records had been released.
The Clinton White House publicly released 13,400 pages of documents regarding Hillary's related health-care "working group" to resolve a 1994 lawsuit. And Clinton campaign spokes-man Jay Carson says that as many as half a million health-care papers have now been disclosed, but he acknowledges that many others have yet to be cleared. "There are undoubtedly other documents related to health care in the hundred million pages" of unreleased records at the library, Carson said, but he added that Clinton's hands were tied because understaffed Archives officials had to review each and every FOIA request—and handle all of them in order. "We don't control their process," he said. "We're not holding anything up."
At the debate, Mrs. Clinton rejected the idea that she could accelerate the process by encouraging her husband to lift restrictions he has placed on confidential communications with his wife on policy matters. "Well, that's not my decision to make," she said. In 1994, according to another National Archives document obtained by NEWSWEEK, President Clinton formally designated both his wife and his close adviser Bruce Lindsey as co-representatives for control of his papers in the event of his death or disability. Lindsey now reviews all White House papers at the library before they are cleared for release; Hillary, Carson says, "has never been involved in the clearing process. Bruce is the designee." But that has not stopped Clinton's principal rival, Sen. Barack Obama, from hitting the issue hard. In an interview with NEWSWEEK, he called Clinton's responses on the records issue "disingenuous." "She can release these papers," Obama said. "She can get them released soon." Carson shot back that Obama "has formally abandoned the politics of hope and is running a negative campaign."
© 2007


Loading Menu
Member Comments
Posted By: ginamlaster @ 03/24/2008 6:16:10 PM
Comment: What on Earth does Obama have to do with Hillary's White House papers? This has nothing to do with him. This has everything to do with the conflict between her claims to years of experience but her unwillingness to release the very documents that could prove her claims. You're seeing what you want to see, but the truth is that Hillary is getting desperate and seeing her stalled campaign go down the drain. don't believe me. Calculate the numbers for yourself. Numbers don't lie, but apparently Hillary does.
Posted By: ginamlaster @ 03/24/2008 6:07:41 PM
Comment: I don't understand. If she has this so-called "wealth" of foreign policy experience gained from the time in her husband's White House, why wouldn't she rush to get that information to the public? How she spent her time in the White House has been well documented. With her campaign in this much trouble, does it make sense that we should have to wait this long for the documents that could prove her time was spent managing affairs of state? She is clearly stonewalling, and her supporters should really be asking themselves why. It doesn't make any sense that she would, since that information would be exactly what she needs to rub Obama's nose in her achievements. They would make it possible to convince her critics once and for all that her 35 years of experience is documented and a matter of public record. This is not a woman who allows people to keep her waiting, especially when she is waging the political fight of her life. The ONLY reason this is taking so long is because those papers will show that she embellished her resume quite a bit, and that will kill her "experience" argument for good.
Posted By: Medge @ 03/05/2008 12:04:12 PM
Comment: This article, "Hillary's Paper Chase...", eloquently explains the real Hillary. This is the same Hillary that attacks and distorts, with fearmongering the real issues--Health care, Iraq, the environmnet, national security, to name but four. The truth is that Hillary is just 'more of the same."
Hillary's so called "comeback" is only the last fluttreings of a fish out of water. Barack is still ahead delegate-wise.
There is a California Court Case, against the Clintons that is not completely out in the open. When this trials, which have been kept hushed by the general Mass Media, are finally in the open, the real Hillary and her machinations, will surface, and the American voters wkill know whom to vote for in the rest of the primaries.
See the follwong websites for more details about the California court case agianst the Clintos and be enlightened.:
l. Gateway Pundit <em> Paul Case againsts Bil Clinton Will...
2. Superior Court for the State of California County of Los Angeles.
These websigtes are real eye-openers about the real Hillarhy.
Wake-up voters!! Hillary Clinton is just MORE OF THE SAME.
Vote for REAL CHANGE. VOTE FOR BARACK OBAMA111